Policies addressing suspension and expulsion in state early care and education subsystems: A national census of policy alignment and integration

IF 3.2 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Martha Buell , Stephanie Kuntz , Anamarie Whitaker , Jason T. Hustedt , Gerilyn Slicker , William Woelki
{"title":"Policies addressing suspension and expulsion in state early care and education subsystems: A national census of policy alignment and integration","authors":"Martha Buell ,&nbsp;Stephanie Kuntz ,&nbsp;Anamarie Whitaker ,&nbsp;Jason T. Hustedt ,&nbsp;Gerilyn Slicker ,&nbsp;William Woelki","doi":"10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.12.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Exclusion from early care and education (ECE) programs creates employment challenges for families and disrupts learning for children, often differentially impacting children placed at-risk due to income, race, and disability. Federal policy guidance and changes in the Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) Block Grant requirements are meant to influence states to create policies that will both regulate and prevent disciplinary exclusions, especially suspension and expulsion. We present a national census of states’ CCDF plans, center-based child care licensing regulations, and state pre-K policies addressing suspension and expulsion. Using content analysis methodology, we evaluate the presence of key policy components of suspension and expulsion prevention including data collection, parent/family involvement in the process of exclusions, accessing community resources, and the use of developmental information to inform the use of exclusionary discipline. Our results indicate that expulsion and suspension policies vary widely both across states, and within the same state's subsystems. The component found most frequently across all subsystems is an expulsion policy, with noticeable variation in specifying and defining suspension. Our findings also point to a great deal of variance in policy alignment, with pre-K including the most information on expulsion and suspension policies and prevention. As state-level policymakers seek to adopt policies that reduce exclusion in ECE, our findings point to a need to consider the importance of creating policies that protect children, especially those over exposed to exclusionary discipline, and then aligning those components within and across ECE subsystems to promote equitable access to ECE. This is particularly important for low-income families, Black children, children with disabilities, and boys.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48348,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","volume":"67 ","pages":"Pages 191-207"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200623001722","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exclusion from early care and education (ECE) programs creates employment challenges for families and disrupts learning for children, often differentially impacting children placed at-risk due to income, race, and disability. Federal policy guidance and changes in the Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) Block Grant requirements are meant to influence states to create policies that will both regulate and prevent disciplinary exclusions, especially suspension and expulsion. We present a national census of states’ CCDF plans, center-based child care licensing regulations, and state pre-K policies addressing suspension and expulsion. Using content analysis methodology, we evaluate the presence of key policy components of suspension and expulsion prevention including data collection, parent/family involvement in the process of exclusions, accessing community resources, and the use of developmental information to inform the use of exclusionary discipline. Our results indicate that expulsion and suspension policies vary widely both across states, and within the same state's subsystems. The component found most frequently across all subsystems is an expulsion policy, with noticeable variation in specifying and defining suspension. Our findings also point to a great deal of variance in policy alignment, with pre-K including the most information on expulsion and suspension policies and prevention. As state-level policymakers seek to adopt policies that reduce exclusion in ECE, our findings point to a need to consider the importance of creating policies that protect children, especially those over exposed to exclusionary discipline, and then aligning those components within and across ECE subsystems to promote equitable access to ECE. This is particularly important for low-income families, Black children, children with disabilities, and boys.

各州早期保育和教育子系统解决停学和开除问题的政策:全国政策协调与整合普查
被排斥在早期保育和教育(ECE)项目之外,会给家庭带来就业方面的挑战,并干扰儿童的学习,通常会对因收入、种族和残疾而被置于危险境地的儿童造成不同程度的影响。联邦政策指导和儿童保育与发展基金(CCDF)整笔拨款要求的变化,旨在影响各州制定既能规范又能预防纪律排斥(尤其是停学和开除)的政策。我们对各州的 CCDF 计划、中心托儿所许可法规以及各州学前教育政策中涉及停学和开除的内容进行了全国性普查。通过内容分析法,我们评估了预防停学和开除的主要政策内容,包括数据收集、家长/家庭参与开除过程、获取社区资源以及使用发展信息来指导开除纪律的使用。我们的研究结果表明,无论是在各州之间,还是在同一州的子系统内,开除和停学政策都存在很大差异。在所有子系统中,最常见的是开除政策,而对停学的具体规定和定义则存在明显差异。我们的研究结果还表明,在政策协调方面也存在很大差异,学前教育包含了最多的开除和停学政策及预防信息。在州一级的政策制定者寻求采取减少幼儿教育中排斥现象的政策时,我们的研究结果表明,有必要考虑制定保护儿童的政策,特别是那些过度暴露于排斥性纪律的儿童,然后在幼儿教育子系统内和子系统间调整这些内容,以促进公平地接受幼儿教育。这对低收入家庭、黑人儿童、残疾儿童和男孩尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.10%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: For over twenty years, Early Childhood Research Quarterly (ECRQ) has influenced the field of early childhood education and development through the publication of empirical research that meets the highest standards of scholarly and practical significance. ECRQ publishes predominantly empirical research (quantitative or qualitative methods) on issues of interest to early childhood development, theory, and educational practice (Birth through 8 years of age). The journal also occasionally publishes practitioner and/or policy perspectives, book reviews, and significant reviews of research. As an applied journal, we are interested in work that has social, policy, and educational relevance and implications and work that strengthens links between research and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信