Can peers help sustain the positive effects of an early childhood mathematics intervention?

IF 3.2 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Caroline M. Botvin , Jade M. Jenkins , Robert C. Carr , Kenneth A. Dodge , Douglas H. Clements , Julie Sarama , Tyler W. Watts
{"title":"Can peers help sustain the positive effects of an early childhood mathematics intervention?","authors":"Caroline M. Botvin ,&nbsp;Jade M. Jenkins ,&nbsp;Robert C. Carr ,&nbsp;Kenneth A. Dodge ,&nbsp;Douglas H. Clements ,&nbsp;Julie Sarama ,&nbsp;Tyler W. Watts","doi":"10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Our study assessed whether the peer environment in kindergarten and first grade affected student learning following an early mathematics intervention. We leveraged longitudinal data from a cluster-RCT to examine whether math achievement in kindergarten (<em>n</em> = 1,218) and first grade (<em>n</em> = 1,126) was affected by either the share of high-achieving classmates or the proportion of classroom peers who received a preschool math curriculum intervention. Analyses indicated that exposure to treated peers in first grade, but not kindergarten, was significantly associated with small gains in end-of-year achievement. Some analyses also suggested that average peer math achievement was positively related to children's kindergarten and first-grade achievement across conditions, though these results were less robust. We did not find consistent evidence to suggest that the proportion of treated peers coincided with better teaching practices. Taken together, these findings suggest that classroom peer effects may play only a limited role in sustaining early intervention effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48348,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","volume":"67 ","pages":"Pages 159-169"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200623001552","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our study assessed whether the peer environment in kindergarten and first grade affected student learning following an early mathematics intervention. We leveraged longitudinal data from a cluster-RCT to examine whether math achievement in kindergarten (n = 1,218) and first grade (n = 1,126) was affected by either the share of high-achieving classmates or the proportion of classroom peers who received a preschool math curriculum intervention. Analyses indicated that exposure to treated peers in first grade, but not kindergarten, was significantly associated with small gains in end-of-year achievement. Some analyses also suggested that average peer math achievement was positively related to children's kindergarten and first-grade achievement across conditions, though these results were less robust. We did not find consistent evidence to suggest that the proportion of treated peers coincided with better teaching practices. Taken together, these findings suggest that classroom peer effects may play only a limited role in sustaining early intervention effects.

同伴能否帮助维持幼儿数学干预的积极效果?
我们的研究评估了早期数学干预后,幼儿园和一年级的同伴环境是否会影响学生的学习。我们利用一项群组研究的纵向数据,考察了幼儿园(n = 1,218 人)和一年级(n = 1,126 人)的数学成绩是否会受到成绩优秀的同学比例或接受学前数学课程干预的同学比例的影响。分析表明,在一年级(而不是幼儿园)接触接受过干预的同学与年终成绩的小幅提高有显著关系。一些分析还表明,在不同条件下,同伴的平均数学成绩与儿童在幼儿园和一年级的成绩呈正相关,但这些结果不太可靠。我们没有发现一致的证据表明,接受治疗的同伴比例与更好的教学实践相吻合。综上所述,这些研究结果表明,课堂同伴效应在维持早期干预效果方面可能作用有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.10%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: For over twenty years, Early Childhood Research Quarterly (ECRQ) has influenced the field of early childhood education and development through the publication of empirical research that meets the highest standards of scholarly and practical significance. ECRQ publishes predominantly empirical research (quantitative or qualitative methods) on issues of interest to early childhood development, theory, and educational practice (Birth through 8 years of age). The journal also occasionally publishes practitioner and/or policy perspectives, book reviews, and significant reviews of research. As an applied journal, we are interested in work that has social, policy, and educational relevance and implications and work that strengthens links between research and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信