Periacetabular osteotomy with and without concomitant arthroscopy: a systematic review of evidence on post-operative activity levels and return to sport

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Phillip Wyatt, Sarah Cole, James Satalich, Brady S Ernst, John Cyrus, Alexander Vap, Robert O’Connell
{"title":"Periacetabular osteotomy with and without concomitant arthroscopy: a systematic review of evidence on post-operative activity levels and return to sport","authors":"Phillip Wyatt, Sarah Cole, James Satalich, Brady S Ernst, John Cyrus, Alexander Vap, Robert O’Connell","doi":"10.1093/jhps/hnad043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this systematic review is to (i) compare post-operative activity levels after periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) versus PAO + HA (concomitant PAO and hip arthroscopy) using patient-reported outcomes that specifically assess activity and sports participation [Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score—Sport and Recreation subscale (HOOS-SR), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, Hip Outcome Score—Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS)] and (ii) compare post-operative return to sport (RTS) data between PAO and PAO + HA groups. A systematic review of literature was conducted on 1 June 2023, utilizing PubMed, Cochrane and Embase (OVID). Articles were screened for inclusion using specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Twenty-six out of 1610 articles met all inclusion criteria, without meeting any exclusion criteria. In the 12 studies containing only subjects who underwent PAO alone, 11 demonstrated an average score improvement in UCLA, HOOS-SR or HOS-SSS post-operatively (P < 0.05). In the three studies containing subjects who underwent PAO with concomitant HA, significant improvements were seen in the HOS-SS and UCLA scores (P < 0.05). In the five studies that directly compared UCLA, HOS-SSS and HOOS-SSS scores between PAO groups and PAO + HA groups, all demonstrated statistically significant improvement post-operatively (P < 0.05). The rate of RTS ranged from 63% to 90.8% among PAO studies and was found to be 81% in the single PAO + HA study that assessed RTS. When performed in patients with intra-articular pathology, concomitant PAO + HA may provide similar sport-related outcomes to PAO alone in patients without intra-articular pathology.","PeriodicalId":48583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnad043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this systematic review is to (i) compare post-operative activity levels after periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) versus PAO + HA (concomitant PAO and hip arthroscopy) using patient-reported outcomes that specifically assess activity and sports participation [Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score—Sport and Recreation subscale (HOOS-SR), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, Hip Outcome Score—Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS)] and (ii) compare post-operative return to sport (RTS) data between PAO and PAO + HA groups. A systematic review of literature was conducted on 1 June 2023, utilizing PubMed, Cochrane and Embase (OVID). Articles were screened for inclusion using specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Twenty-six out of 1610 articles met all inclusion criteria, without meeting any exclusion criteria. In the 12 studies containing only subjects who underwent PAO alone, 11 demonstrated an average score improvement in UCLA, HOOS-SR or HOS-SSS post-operatively (P < 0.05). In the three studies containing subjects who underwent PAO with concomitant HA, significant improvements were seen in the HOS-SS and UCLA scores (P < 0.05). In the five studies that directly compared UCLA, HOS-SSS and HOOS-SSS scores between PAO groups and PAO + HA groups, all demonstrated statistically significant improvement post-operatively (P < 0.05). The rate of RTS ranged from 63% to 90.8% among PAO studies and was found to be 81% in the single PAO + HA study that assessed RTS. When performed in patients with intra-articular pathology, concomitant PAO + HA may provide similar sport-related outcomes to PAO alone in patients without intra-articular pathology.
伴有或不伴有关节镜手术的髋臼周围截骨术:关于术后活动水平和恢复运动的证据的系统性综述
本系统性综述的目的是:(i) 使用专门评估活动和运动参与情况的患者报告结果[髋关节残疾和骨关节炎结果评分--运动和娱乐子量表(HOOS-SR)、加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)活动评分、髋关节结果评分--运动场所特定子量表(HOS-SSS)],比较髋臼周围截骨术(PAO)与 PAO + HA(同时进行 PAO 和髋关节镜检查)术后的活动水平;(ii) 比较髋臼周围截骨术与髋关节镜检查术后的运动恢复(RTS)数据、加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)活动评分、髋关节结果评分-运动特定分量表(HOS-SSS)];(ii) 比较 PAO 组和 PAO + HA 组的术后恢复运动(RTS)数据。2023 年 6 月 1 日,利用 PubMed、Cochrane 和 Embase (OVID) 对文献进行了系统性审查。采用特定的纳入和排除标准对文章进行筛选。在 1610 篇文章中,有 26 篇符合所有纳入标准,且不符合任何排除标准。在仅包含接受单纯 PAO 的受试者的 12 项研究中,11 项研究显示术后 UCLA、HOOS-SR 或 HOS-SSS 平均得分有所提高(P < 0.05)。在包含同时接受 PAO 和 HA 的受试者的三项研究中,HOS-SS 和 UCLA 评分均有显著改善(P< 0.05)。在直接比较 PAO 组和 PAO + HA 组之间 UCLA、HOS-SSS 和 HOOS-SSS 评分的五项研究中,所有研究均显示术后评分有明显的统计学改善(P &;lt;0.05)。在 PAO 研究中,RTS 的发生率从 63% 到 90.8% 不等,在一项评估 RTS 的 PAO + HA 研究中,RTS 的发生率为 81%。如果在有关节内病变的患者中实施 PAO + HA,那么在没有关节内病变的患者中,同时实施 PAO + HA 可提供与单独 PAO 相似的运动相关结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信