Alveolar Ridge Preservation Procedures Performed with Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft: Clinical and Histologic Outcomes in a Case Series: Part II.

Antonio Barone, Chiara Cinquini, Nicola Alberto Valente, Eugenio Velasco-Ortega, Giacomo Derchi, Emira D'Amico, Giovanna Iezzi
{"title":"Alveolar Ridge Preservation Procedures Performed with Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft: Clinical and Histologic Outcomes in a Case Series: Part II.","authors":"Antonio Barone, Chiara Cinquini, Nicola Alberto Valente, Eugenio Velasco-Ortega, Giacomo Derchi, Emira D'Amico, Giovanna Iezzi","doi":"10.11607/prd.6953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tooth extractions can result in alveolar bone dimensional changes, necessitating additional bone grafting for implant placement. Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) aims to counteract postextraction changes. This case series evaluates the bone regenerative properties of a freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) and the clinical outcomes of implants in grafted extraction sites. A total of 33 patients were enrolled, undergoing single/multiple tooth extractions followed by ARP. Biopsy samples were harvested during implant placement for histologic and histomorphometric analysis. Clinical outcomes included marginal bone loss and pink esthetic score (PES). Twenty-five patients completed the study. FDBA-augmented sockets exhibited new bone formation adjacent to graft particles. Implants (n = 25) showed 100% survival and success rates at 1 and 2 years. PES improved significantly over time (P < .001), while marginal bone loss did not significantly differ at 1 and 2 years (P = .096). Specimens showed trabecular bone, residual FDBA particles, and marrow spaces. High magnification revealed immature bone and woven bone bridges around graft particles. No inflammatory cells were observed. This case series provides valuable insights into ARP performed with FDBA (as implants were placed after 3 months of healing without any additional bone augmentation), the histologic outcomes were favorable, and implants were successful after a 2-year follow-up period.</p>","PeriodicalId":94231,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"685-696"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.6953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tooth extractions can result in alveolar bone dimensional changes, necessitating additional bone grafting for implant placement. Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) aims to counteract postextraction changes. This case series evaluates the bone regenerative properties of a freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) and the clinical outcomes of implants in grafted extraction sites. A total of 33 patients were enrolled, undergoing single/multiple tooth extractions followed by ARP. Biopsy samples were harvested during implant placement for histologic and histomorphometric analysis. Clinical outcomes included marginal bone loss and pink esthetic score (PES). Twenty-five patients completed the study. FDBA-augmented sockets exhibited new bone formation adjacent to graft particles. Implants (n = 25) showed 100% survival and success rates at 1 and 2 years. PES improved significantly over time (P < .001), while marginal bone loss did not significantly differ at 1 and 2 years (P = .096). Specimens showed trabecular bone, residual FDBA particles, and marrow spaces. High magnification revealed immature bone and woven bone bridges around graft particles. No inflammatory cells were observed. This case series provides valuable insights into ARP performed with FDBA (as implants were placed after 3 months of healing without any additional bone augmentation), the histologic outcomes were favorable, and implants were successful after a 2-year follow-up period.

使用冻干骨异体移植进行牙槽嵴保存术:系列病例的临床和组织学结果:第二部分.
简介拔牙会导致牙槽骨的尺寸发生变化,因此有必要进行额外的骨移植以植入种植体。牙槽嵴保留(ARP)的目的是对抗拔牙后的变化。本研究评估了冻干骨异体移植(FDBA)的骨再生特性以及移植拔牙部位种植体的临床效果:本病例系列共纳入 33 名接受单颗/多颗牙拔除术后 ARP 的患者。在植入过程中采集活检组织,进行组织学和组织形态学分析。临床结果包括边缘骨质流失和粉红美学评分(PES)。FDBA增量基台显示出邻近移植颗粒的新骨形成。种植体(25 个)在 1 年和 2 年后的存活率和成功率均为 100%。随着时间的推移,PES明显改善(p结论:该系列病例为使用 FDBA 进行 ARP 提供了有价值的见解;种植体在愈合 3 个月后植入,无需额外的骨增量,组织学结果良好,随访 2 年后种植体成功植入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信