Retrospective Analysis of Medical Attrition for Pilot Applicants to the British Army Air Corps.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Mark S Adams, Claire E Goldie, Steven J Gaydos
{"title":"Retrospective Analysis of Medical Attrition for Pilot Applicants to the British Army Air Corps.","authors":"Mark S Adams, Claire E Goldie, Steven J Gaydos","doi":"10.3357/AMHP.6342.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>INTRODUCTION:</b> Management of aeromedical risk is essential for flight safety. Given the many operator stressors for pilots, militaries maintain a vested interest in selecting aircrew applicants who meet rigorous initial medical standards. Very little published literature exists regarding the extent of medical disqualifications or precluding conditions for initial candidates.<b>METHODS:</b> For the British Army, pilot selection is a phased, multistep process that includes Phase I medical screening followed by a comprehensive Phase II medical exam. De-identified summary data were retrospectively reviewed for medical fitness and disqualifying categories for the 5-yr period of 2018-2022, inclusive. For those ultimately deemed unfit for aviation service, etiology was grouped into general categories.<b>RESULTS:</b> Approximately one-third (30.2%) of candidates were disqualified at Phase I initial medical screening with leading categories of attrition due to respiratory etiology, especially a history of asthma or reactive airway disease, followed by ophthalmology. For the Phase II medical exam cohort, 21.0% were medically disqualified with most attrition from anthropometry and ophthalmology. There were no statistical differences in disqualifications for gender or pathway of entry (civilian vs. serving personnel).<b>DISCUSSION:</b> Major categories of medical attrition were similar to that of other nations, yet the published literature in this area is surprisingly tenuous. Given the desire for evidence-based medical selection standards, it is important for regular review of processes and standards such that the risks of known physiological challenges are judiciously weighed with the benefits of a large, diverse pool of selection as well as force structure and recruitment demand.<b>Adams MS, Goldie CE, Gaydos SJ. <i>Retrospective analysis of medical attrition for pilot applicants to the British Army Air Corps</i>. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2023; 94(12):939-943.</b></p>","PeriodicalId":7463,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","volume":"94 12","pages":"939-943"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.6342.2023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Management of aeromedical risk is essential for flight safety. Given the many operator stressors for pilots, militaries maintain a vested interest in selecting aircrew applicants who meet rigorous initial medical standards. Very little published literature exists regarding the extent of medical disqualifications or precluding conditions for initial candidates.METHODS: For the British Army, pilot selection is a phased, multistep process that includes Phase I medical screening followed by a comprehensive Phase II medical exam. De-identified summary data were retrospectively reviewed for medical fitness and disqualifying categories for the 5-yr period of 2018-2022, inclusive. For those ultimately deemed unfit for aviation service, etiology was grouped into general categories.RESULTS: Approximately one-third (30.2%) of candidates were disqualified at Phase I initial medical screening with leading categories of attrition due to respiratory etiology, especially a history of asthma or reactive airway disease, followed by ophthalmology. For the Phase II medical exam cohort, 21.0% were medically disqualified with most attrition from anthropometry and ophthalmology. There were no statistical differences in disqualifications for gender or pathway of entry (civilian vs. serving personnel).DISCUSSION: Major categories of medical attrition were similar to that of other nations, yet the published literature in this area is surprisingly tenuous. Given the desire for evidence-based medical selection standards, it is important for regular review of processes and standards such that the risks of known physiological challenges are judiciously weighed with the benefits of a large, diverse pool of selection as well as force structure and recruitment demand.Adams MS, Goldie CE, Gaydos SJ. Retrospective analysis of medical attrition for pilot applicants to the British Army Air Corps. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2023; 94(12):939-943.

英国陆军航空兵飞行员申请者医疗减员的回顾性分析。
引言:航空医疗风险管理对飞行安全至关重要。由于飞行员面临许多操作压力,因此军方在选择空勤人员申请者时必须符合严格的初始体检标准。方法:对于英国军队来说,飞行员选拔是一个分阶段、多步骤的过程,包括第一阶段体检筛查和第二阶段全面体检。对去身份化的汇总数据进行了回顾性审查,以了解 2018 年至 2022 年(含 2022 年)这 5 年间的健康状况和不合格类别。结果:约有三分之一(30.2%)的候选人在第一阶段初步体检中被取消资格,主要的流失类别是呼吸系统病因,尤其是哮喘或反应性气道疾病史,其次是眼科。在第二阶段体检队列中,21.0%的人被取消体检资格,其中大部分人因人体测量和眼科而流失。在性别或入伍途径(文职人员与现役军人)方面,取消体检资格的情况没有统计学差异。讨论:体检减员的主要类别与其他国家相似,但该领域发表的文献却少得令人吃惊。鉴于对循证医学选拔标准的渴望,对流程和标准进行定期审查非常重要,以便明智地权衡已知生理挑战的风险与大量、多样化选拔人才库的益处,以及部队结构和征兵需求。英国陆军航空兵飞行员申请者医疗减员的回顾性分析。Aerosp Med Hum Perform.2023; 94(12):939-943.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aerospace medicine and human performance
Aerospace medicine and human performance PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
22.20%
发文量
272
期刊介绍: The peer-reviewed monthly journal, Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance (AMHP), formerly Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, provides contact with physicians, life scientists, bioengineers, and medical specialists working in both basic medical research and in its clinical applications. It is the most used and cited journal in its field. It is distributed to more than 80 nations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信