Seeking the best alternatives: A systematic review and meta-analysis on replacing fishmeal with plant protein sources in carnivorous fish species

IF 8.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES
Yi-Fan Qian, Samwel M. Limbu, Fang Qiao, Yuan Luo, Li-Qiao Chen, Mei-Ling Zhang, Zhen-Yu Du
{"title":"Seeking the best alternatives: A systematic review and meta-analysis on replacing fishmeal with plant protein sources in carnivorous fish species","authors":"Yi-Fan Qian,&nbsp;Samwel M. Limbu,&nbsp;Fang Qiao,&nbsp;Yuan Luo,&nbsp;Li-Qiao Chen,&nbsp;Mei-Ling Zhang,&nbsp;Zhen-Yu Du","doi":"10.1111/raq.12888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The price of fishmeal (FM) has been increasing continuously due to the expansion of the gap between its stable production and rising demand. Therefore, plant protein sources are widely applied in the aquaculture industry to accomplish the protein requirement of farmed fish species. However, the massive number of results produced under various experimental conditions appended challenges for comprehensive summarization and comparison of the effects of plant protein sources on carnivorous fish species. Thus, a systemic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare the impacts of various plant protein sources on growth, feed utilization efficiencies, blood lipid, and liver health of representative carnivorous species. Supported by the data from 256 articles, our results indicated that Atlantic salmon, African catfish, Black seabass, and Hybrid striped bass were better at utilizing plant protein sources than Grouper and Japanese seabass. Cottonseed and lupin proteins were promising protein alternatives, while rapeseed showed significant growth suppression effects for these carnivorous fish species. Besides, deep processing methods such as fermentation and enzymolysis alleviated undesirable consequences effectively when less than half of FM was replaced by plant protein sources. Moreover, the optimal plant protein sources are discussed for each fish species. Overall, this article depicts the impact patterns of major plant protein sources on carnivorous farmed fish species and lays a solid foundation for further investigation on mechanisms for improving plant protein utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":"16 3","pages":"1099-1126"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Aquaculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/raq.12888","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The price of fishmeal (FM) has been increasing continuously due to the expansion of the gap between its stable production and rising demand. Therefore, plant protein sources are widely applied in the aquaculture industry to accomplish the protein requirement of farmed fish species. However, the massive number of results produced under various experimental conditions appended challenges for comprehensive summarization and comparison of the effects of plant protein sources on carnivorous fish species. Thus, a systemic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare the impacts of various plant protein sources on growth, feed utilization efficiencies, blood lipid, and liver health of representative carnivorous species. Supported by the data from 256 articles, our results indicated that Atlantic salmon, African catfish, Black seabass, and Hybrid striped bass were better at utilizing plant protein sources than Grouper and Japanese seabass. Cottonseed and lupin proteins were promising protein alternatives, while rapeseed showed significant growth suppression effects for these carnivorous fish species. Besides, deep processing methods such as fermentation and enzymolysis alleviated undesirable consequences effectively when less than half of FM was replaced by plant protein sources. Moreover, the optimal plant protein sources are discussed for each fish species. Overall, this article depicts the impact patterns of major plant protein sources on carnivorous farmed fish species and lays a solid foundation for further investigation on mechanisms for improving plant protein utilization.

寻找最佳替代品:肉食性鱼类用植物蛋白源替代鱼粉的系统综述和荟萃分析
由于鱼粉(FM)稳定的产量与不断增长的需求之间的差距不断扩大,鱼粉的价格持续上涨。因此,植物蛋白源被广泛应用于水产养殖业,以满足养殖鱼类对蛋白质的需求。然而,在各种实验条件下产生的大量结果给全面总结和比较植物蛋白源对肉食性鱼类的影响带来了挑战。因此,我们进行了系统综述和荟萃分析,以比较各种植物蛋白源对代表性肉食性鱼类的生长、饲料利用效率、血脂和肝脏健康的影响。在 256 篇文章数据的支持下,我们的结果表明,大西洋鲑鱼、非洲鲶鱼、黑鲈和杂交带鱼对植物蛋白源的利用率高于石斑鱼和日本鲈鱼。棉籽和羽扇豆蛋白是很有前景的蛋白质替代品,而油菜籽对这些肉食性鱼类的生长有显著的抑制作用。此外,发酵和酶解等深加工方法可有效缓解不良后果,当植物蛋白源替代了不到一半的饲料添加剂时。此外,文章还讨论了每种鱼类的最佳植物蛋白来源。总之,本文描述了主要植物蛋白源对肉食性养殖鱼类的影响模式,为进一步研究提高植物蛋白利用率的机制奠定了坚实的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
24.80
自引率
5.80%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reviews in Aquaculture is a journal that aims to provide a platform for reviews on various aspects of aquaculture science, techniques, policies, and planning. The journal publishes fully peer-reviewed review articles on topics including global, regional, and national production and market trends in aquaculture, advancements in aquaculture practices and technology, interactions between aquaculture and the environment, indigenous and alien species in aquaculture, genetics and its relation to aquaculture, as well as aquaculture product quality and traceability. The journal is indexed and abstracted in several databases including AgBiotech News & Information (CABI), AgBiotechNet, Agricultural Engineering Abstracts, Environment Index (EBSCO Publishing), SCOPUS (Elsevier), and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信