Communicating Standing and Walking Data after Spinal Cord Injury: A Patient-Engaged, Qualitative Study.

IF 2.4 Q1 REHABILITATION
Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-17 DOI:10.46292/sci23-00019S
Katherine Chan, Lovisa Cheung, Chris Taylor, Chelsea Wong, Grace Inglis, Kristen Walden, Kristin E Musselman
{"title":"Communicating Standing and Walking Data after Spinal Cord Injury: A Patient-Engaged, Qualitative Study.","authors":"Katherine Chan, Lovisa Cheung, Chris Taylor, Chelsea Wong, Grace Inglis, Kristen Walden, Kristin E Musselman","doi":"10.46292/sci23-00019S","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Standing and Walking Assessment Tool has been implemented by physical therapists across Canada, but there is no standardized communication tool to inform inpatients living with spinal cord injury (SCI) about their standing and walking ability.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify how inpatients with SCI are currently receiving feedback on their standing and walking ability, and to determine if and how they would like to receive information on their standing and walking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ontario's Patient Engagement Framework informed study protocol development. Inpatients with SCI were recruited from a rehabilitation centre in Canada. Purposeful sampling considering severity of SCI and sex was adopted. Three to four months following discharge from inpatient rehabilitation, a semi-structured interview was conducted to explore participants'experiences and preferences regarding feedback on standing and walking ability during inpatient SCI rehabilitation. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A conventional content analysis was completed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen individuals with SCI (5 female, 10 male) participated. Four themes emerged from the transcripts: (1) motivation for standing and walking, (2) current standing and walking practice, (3) participant preferences for feedback on standing and walking ability, and (4) perceptions of preexisting tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Information on standing and walking ability was shared with inpatients with SCI in a variety of ways. Participants identified various preferences for the nature, format, and frequency of feedback concerning standing and walking ability during inpatient rehabilitation, which suggests the need for an individualized approach to communicating this information.</p>","PeriodicalId":46769,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation","volume":"29 Suppl","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10759847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46292/sci23-00019S","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Standing and Walking Assessment Tool has been implemented by physical therapists across Canada, but there is no standardized communication tool to inform inpatients living with spinal cord injury (SCI) about their standing and walking ability.

Objectives: To identify how inpatients with SCI are currently receiving feedback on their standing and walking ability, and to determine if and how they would like to receive information on their standing and walking.

Methods: Ontario's Patient Engagement Framework informed study protocol development. Inpatients with SCI were recruited from a rehabilitation centre in Canada. Purposeful sampling considering severity of SCI and sex was adopted. Three to four months following discharge from inpatient rehabilitation, a semi-structured interview was conducted to explore participants'experiences and preferences regarding feedback on standing and walking ability during inpatient SCI rehabilitation. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A conventional content analysis was completed.

Results: Fifteen individuals with SCI (5 female, 10 male) participated. Four themes emerged from the transcripts: (1) motivation for standing and walking, (2) current standing and walking practice, (3) participant preferences for feedback on standing and walking ability, and (4) perceptions of preexisting tools.

Conclusion: Information on standing and walking ability was shared with inpatients with SCI in a variety of ways. Participants identified various preferences for the nature, format, and frequency of feedback concerning standing and walking ability during inpatient rehabilitation, which suggests the need for an individualized approach to communicating this information.

脊髓损伤后站立和行走数据的交流:患者参与的定性研究。
背景:加拿大各地的理疗师都在使用站立和行走评估工具,但目前还没有标准化的交流工具来告知脊髓损伤(SCI)住院患者他们的站立和行走能力:确定脊髓损伤住院患者目前如何获得有关其站立和行走能力的反馈信息,并确定他们是否以及如何希望获得有关其站立和行走能力的信息:方法:根据安大略省患者参与框架制定研究方案。从加拿大一家康复中心招募了患有 SCI 的住院患者。根据 SCI 的严重程度和性别进行有目的的抽样。从住院康复中心出院三到四个月后,我们进行了一次半结构化访谈,以了解参与者在 SCI 住院康复期间对站立和行走能力反馈的经验和偏好。对访谈进行了录音和逐字记录。结果:15 名 SCI 患者(5 名女性,10 名男性)参加了访谈。访谈记录中出现了四个主题:(1) 站立和行走的动机;(2) 当前的站立和行走实践;(3) 参与者对站立和行走能力反馈的偏好;(4) 对现有工具的看法:结论:与 SCI 住院患者分享站立和行走能力信息的方式多种多样。参与者对住院康复期间有关站立和行走能力的反馈的性质、形式和频率有不同的偏好,这表明有必要采用个性化的方法来传达这些信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Now in our 22nd year as the leading interdisciplinary journal of SCI rehabilitation techniques and care. TSCIR is peer-reviewed, practical, and features one key topic per issue. Published topics include: mobility, sexuality, genitourinary, functional assessment, skin care, psychosocial, high tetraplegia, physical activity, pediatric, FES, sci/tbi, electronic medicine, orthotics, secondary conditions, research, aging, legal issues, women & sci, pain, environmental effects, life care planning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信