Importance of computed tomography in posterior malleolar fractures: Added information to preoperative X-ray studies.

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Noé De Marchi Neto, Pietro Felice Tomazini Nesello, Jordanna Maria Bergamasco, Marco Tulio Costa, Ralph Walter Christian, Nilson Roberto Severino
{"title":"Importance of computed tomography in posterior malleolar fractures: Added information to preoperative X-ray studies.","authors":"Noé De Marchi Neto, Pietro Felice Tomazini Nesello, Jordanna Maria Bergamasco, Marco Tulio Costa, Ralph Walter Christian, Nilson Roberto Severino","doi":"10.5312/wjo.v14.i12.868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ankle fractures are common lesions of the lower limbs. Approximately 40% of ankle fractures affect the posterior malleolus (PM). Historically, PM osteosynthesis was recommended when PM size in X-ray images was greater than 25% of the joint. Currently, computed tomography (CT) has been gaining traction in the preoperative evaluation of ankle fractures.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To elucidate the similarity in dimensions and to correlate PM size in X-ray images with the articular surface of the affected tibial plafond in the axial view on CT (AXCT) of a PM fracture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-one patients (mean age: 39.4 ± 13.5 years) were evaluated (54.3% were male). Two independent examiners measured PM size in profile X-ray images (PMXR) and sagittal CT (SAGCT) slices. The correlation of the measurements between the examiners and the difference in the PM fragment sizes between the two images were compared. Next, the PM size in PMXR was compared with the surface of the tibial plafond involved in the fracture in AXCT according to the Haraguchi classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The correlation rates between the examiners were 0.93 and 0.94 for PMXR and SAGCT, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Fragments were 2.12% larger in SAGCT than in PMXR (<i>P</i> = 0.018). In PMXR, there were 56 cases < 25% and 25 cases ≥ 25%. When PMXR was < 25%, AXCT corresponded to 10.13% of the tibial plafond. When PMXR was ≥ 25%, AXCT was 24.52% (<i>P</i> < 0.001). According to the Haraguchi classification, fracture types I and II had similar PMXR measurements that were greater than those of type III. When analyzing AXCT, a significant difference was found between the three types, with II > I > III (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PM fractures show different sizes using X-ray or CT images. CT showed a larger PM in the sagittal plane and allowed the visualization of the real dimensions of the tibial plafond surface.</p>","PeriodicalId":47843,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Orthopedics","volume":"14 12","pages":"868-877"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10758590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v14.i12.868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ankle fractures are common lesions of the lower limbs. Approximately 40% of ankle fractures affect the posterior malleolus (PM). Historically, PM osteosynthesis was recommended when PM size in X-ray images was greater than 25% of the joint. Currently, computed tomography (CT) has been gaining traction in the preoperative evaluation of ankle fractures.

Aim: To elucidate the similarity in dimensions and to correlate PM size in X-ray images with the articular surface of the affected tibial plafond in the axial view on CT (AXCT) of a PM fracture.

Methods: Eighty-one patients (mean age: 39.4 ± 13.5 years) were evaluated (54.3% were male). Two independent examiners measured PM size in profile X-ray images (PMXR) and sagittal CT (SAGCT) slices. The correlation of the measurements between the examiners and the difference in the PM fragment sizes between the two images were compared. Next, the PM size in PMXR was compared with the surface of the tibial plafond involved in the fracture in AXCT according to the Haraguchi classification.

Results: The correlation rates between the examiners were 0.93 and 0.94 for PMXR and SAGCT, respectively (P < 0.001). Fragments were 2.12% larger in SAGCT than in PMXR (P = 0.018). In PMXR, there were 56 cases < 25% and 25 cases ≥ 25%. When PMXR was < 25%, AXCT corresponded to 10.13% of the tibial plafond. When PMXR was ≥ 25%, AXCT was 24.52% (P < 0.001). According to the Haraguchi classification, fracture types I and II had similar PMXR measurements that were greater than those of type III. When analyzing AXCT, a significant difference was found between the three types, with II > I > III (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: PM fractures show different sizes using X-ray or CT images. CT showed a larger PM in the sagittal plane and allowed the visualization of the real dimensions of the tibial plafond surface.

计算机断层扫描在踝后骨折中的重要性:术前 X 光检查的补充信息。
背景:踝关节骨折是下肢常见的损伤。约 40% 的踝关节骨折影响到后踝骨(PM)。一直以来,当 X 射线图像中 PM 的大小超过关节的 25% 时,就会建议进行 PM 骨合成术。目前,计算机断层扫描(CT)在踝关节骨折的术前评估中越来越受到重视。目的:阐明X光图像中PM尺寸的相似性,并将X光图像中的PM尺寸与CT轴向视图(AXCT)中PM骨折的受累胫骨板关节面相关联:对 81 名患者(平均年龄:39.4 ± 13.5 岁)进行了评估(54.3% 为男性)。两名独立的检查人员测量了X光轮廓图像(PMXR)和矢状CT(SAGCT)切片中原发性骨髓瘤的大小。比较了检查者之间测量结果的相关性和两种图像中 PM 碎片大小的差异。然后,根据 Haraguchi 分类法,将 PMXR 中的 PM 大小与 AXCT 中涉及骨折的胫骨板表面进行比较:PMXR和SAGCT检查者之间的相关性分别为0.93和0.94(P < 0.001)。SAGCT的碎片比PMXR大2.12%(P = 0.018)。在 PMXR 中,有 56 例 < 25%,25 例 ≥ 25%。当 PMXR < 25% 时,AXCT 相当于胫骨骺板的 10.13%。当PMXR≥25%时,AXCT为24.52%(P<0.001)。根据原口分类法,I型和II型骨折的PMXR测量值相似,但大于III型。在分析 AXCT 时,发现三种类型之间存在显著差异,II > I > III(P < 0.001):结论:X射线或CT图像显示的PM骨折大小不同。CT在矢状面上显示的PM更大,可以看到胫骨板表面的真实尺寸。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
814
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信