Is there a difference between acute appendicitis in pregnant and non-pregnant women?

IF 0.5 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Petra Guňková, Lubomír Tulinský, Daniel Toman, Lubomír Martínek, Adéla Vrtková, Richard Špaček, Ondřej Šimetka
{"title":"Is there a difference between acute appendicitis in pregnant and non-pregnant women?","authors":"Petra Guňková, Lubomír Tulinský, Daniel Toman, Lubomír Martínek, Adéla Vrtková, Richard Špaček, Ondřej Šimetka","doi":"10.48095/cccg2023405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Acute appendicitis is the most common indication for surgical intervention during pregnancy for non-gynaecological or non-obstetric causes. The aim of this study was to compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes of acute appendectomies in pregnant and non-pregnant patients of childbearing age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective clinical study focused on the comparison of perioperative and postoperative outcomes of acute appendectomy in pregnant and non-pregnant patients of reproductive age between January 2012 and December 2021 at the University Hospital in Ostrava.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A number of 308 patients underwent acute appendectomy, 25 pregnant and 283 non-pregnant. There were no statistically significant differences in age, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) classification, duration of complaints, baseline C-reactive protein values, sensitivity or specificity of sonography. A statistically significant difference was found in the leukocyte count between subgroups (P = 0.014) and in the number of laparoscopic procedures performed between the two subgroups (P < 0.001; 98.9% non-pregnant vs. 80.0% pregnant). There was also a statistically significant difference in the length of hospital stay, with the pregnant subgroup having a longer hospital stay (P = 0.014) and a statistically significant difference in the rate of postoperative complications between the defined subgroups (P = 0.039). Serious complications were described predominantly in the subgroup of pregnant patients, where they reached 12% compared to non-pregnant patients, where they were 2.8%. The mortality rate of the cohort was zero.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the study support the fact that pregnancy may be associated with complicated forms of acute appendicitis. Accurate and early diagnosis not only prevents the development of complicated forms of appendicitis but also reduces the number of negative appendectomies in pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":43333,"journal":{"name":"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology","volume":"88 6","pages":"405-411"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48095/cccg2023405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Acute appendicitis is the most common indication for surgical intervention during pregnancy for non-gynaecological or non-obstetric causes. The aim of this study was to compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes of acute appendectomies in pregnant and non-pregnant patients of childbearing age.

Methods: A retrospective clinical study focused on the comparison of perioperative and postoperative outcomes of acute appendectomy in pregnant and non-pregnant patients of reproductive age between January 2012 and December 2021 at the University Hospital in Ostrava.

Results: A number of 308 patients underwent acute appendectomy, 25 pregnant and 283 non-pregnant. There were no statistically significant differences in age, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) classification, duration of complaints, baseline C-reactive protein values, sensitivity or specificity of sonography. A statistically significant difference was found in the leukocyte count between subgroups (P = 0.014) and in the number of laparoscopic procedures performed between the two subgroups (P < 0.001; 98.9% non-pregnant vs. 80.0% pregnant). There was also a statistically significant difference in the length of hospital stay, with the pregnant subgroup having a longer hospital stay (P = 0.014) and a statistically significant difference in the rate of postoperative complications between the defined subgroups (P = 0.039). Serious complications were described predominantly in the subgroup of pregnant patients, where they reached 12% compared to non-pregnant patients, where they were 2.8%. The mortality rate of the cohort was zero.

Conclusion: The results of the study support the fact that pregnancy may be associated with complicated forms of acute appendicitis. Accurate and early diagnosis not only prevents the development of complicated forms of appendicitis but also reduces the number of negative appendectomies in pregnancy.

孕妇和非孕妇的急性阑尾炎有区别吗?
目的:急性阑尾炎是妊娠期因非妇科或非产科原因进行手术治疗的最常见指征。本研究旨在比较妊娠期和非妊娠期育龄患者急性阑尾炎手术的围手术期和术后效果:方法:一项回顾性临床研究,重点比较2012年1月至2021年12月期间在俄斯特拉发大学医院接受急性阑尾切除术的育龄孕妇和非孕妇的围手术期和术后效果:308名患者接受了急性阑尾切除术,其中25人为孕妇,283人为非孕妇。在年龄、ASA(美国麻醉医师协会)分类、主诉持续时间、C反应蛋白基线值、超声波检查的敏感性或特异性等方面没有统计学差异。两个亚组之间的白细胞计数(P = 0.014)和腹腔镜手术次数(P < 0.001; 98.9% 非妊娠 vs. 80.0% 妊娠)差异有统计学意义。住院时间的差异也有统计学意义,妊娠亚组的住院时间更长(P = 0.014),两个亚组的术后并发症发生率差异也有统计学意义(P = 0.039)。严重并发症主要发生在妊娠患者亚组,达到12%,而非妊娠患者为2.8%。研究组的死亡率为零:研究结果证明,妊娠可能与急性阑尾炎的并发症有关。准确和早期诊断不仅能预防复杂性阑尾炎的发生,还能减少妊娠期阑尾切除术的失败率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology
Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信