[Comparison of clear aligners and customized lingual appliance for bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: a retrospective study].

Q4 Medicine
上海口腔医学 Pub Date : 2023-10-01
Zhen-Xia Li, Ling-Jun Yuan, Xiao-Wen Zheng, Lu Liu, Chao Liu, Bing Fang
{"title":"[Comparison of clear aligners and customized lingual appliance for bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: a retrospective study].","authors":"Zhen-Xia Li, Ling-Jun Yuan, Xiao-Wen Zheng, Lu Liu, Chao Liu, Bing Fang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the treatment effects of clear aligners and customized lingual appliance on treating bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion patients with first premolar extractions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-four patients with bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion treated in Shanghai Ninth People Hospital were involved in the retrospective study. Twenty-five cases used clear aligners and 29 cases used customized lingual appliance. All of them were treated by extracting 4 first premolars and retracting anterior teeth with strong anchorage. The changes of anterior tooth and soft tissue adduction before and after treatment were compared by lateral cephalometric measurements. SPSS 26.0 software package was used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total course of treatment in the clear aligners group (46.32±7.37 months) was about 10.8 months longer than that in the customized lingual appliance group (35.55±5.90 months) (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in upper incisor retraction, lower incisor inclination and overjet reduction between the two groups(P>0.05). There were significant differences in upper lip retraction, lower lip retraction, upper incisor torque reduction, and overbite reduction between the two groups(P<0.05). Customized lingual appliance group showed a significant improvement of lips retraction and overbite reduction in orthodontic treatment. For the correction of overjet, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.337). The data of U1-OP (the distance between edge of the upper central incisor and the functional occlusal plane) was not in normal distribution, and there was no significant difference between the two groups(P=0.184).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The two techniques can both retract the anterior teeth and lips to improve the profile. However, the customized lingual appliance was more effective in improving the soft tissue profile of patients with bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion, with shorter treatment course.</p>","PeriodicalId":21709,"journal":{"name":"上海口腔医学","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"上海口腔医学","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the treatment effects of clear aligners and customized lingual appliance on treating bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion patients with first premolar extractions.

Methods: Fifty-four patients with bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion treated in Shanghai Ninth People Hospital were involved in the retrospective study. Twenty-five cases used clear aligners and 29 cases used customized lingual appliance. All of them were treated by extracting 4 first premolars and retracting anterior teeth with strong anchorage. The changes of anterior tooth and soft tissue adduction before and after treatment were compared by lateral cephalometric measurements. SPSS 26.0 software package was used for data analysis.

Results: The total course of treatment in the clear aligners group (46.32±7.37 months) was about 10.8 months longer than that in the customized lingual appliance group (35.55±5.90 months) (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in upper incisor retraction, lower incisor inclination and overjet reduction between the two groups(P>0.05). There were significant differences in upper lip retraction, lower lip retraction, upper incisor torque reduction, and overbite reduction between the two groups(P<0.05). Customized lingual appliance group showed a significant improvement of lips retraction and overbite reduction in orthodontic treatment. For the correction of overjet, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.337). The data of U1-OP (the distance between edge of the upper central incisor and the functional occlusal plane) was not in normal distribution, and there was no significant difference between the two groups(P=0.184).

Conclusions: The two techniques can both retract the anterior teeth and lips to improve the profile. However, the customized lingual appliance was more effective in improving the soft tissue profile of patients with bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion, with shorter treatment course.

[透明矫治器与定制舌侧矫治器治疗双颌牙槽前突的比较:一项回顾性研究]。
目的:比较透明矫治器和定制舌侧矫治器对第一前磨牙拔除术后双颌牙槽前突患者的治疗效果:54例在上海市第九人民医院接受治疗的双颌牙槽前突患者参与了该回顾性研究。其中25例使用透明矫治器,29例使用定制的舌侧矫治器。所有病例都是通过拔除 4 颗第一前磨牙和后退前牙,并用坚固的固定装置进行治疗的。通过头颅侧位测量比较治疗前后前牙和软组织内收的变化。数据分析采用 SPSS 26.0 软件包:透明矫治器组的总疗程(46.32±7.37 个月)比定制舌侧矫治器组(35.55±5.90 个月)长约 10.8 个月(P<0.05)。两组在上切牙后缩、下切牙倾斜和过咬合缩小方面无明显差异(P>0.05)。两组在上唇后缩、下唇后缩、上切牙扭转减小和咬合过度减小方面差异有学意义(P<0.05)。在正畸治疗中,定制舌侧矫治器组在嘴唇后缩和咬合过大缩小方面有明显改善。在矫正过咬合方面,两组间无明显差异(P=0.337)。U1-OP(上中切牙边缘与功能咬合面之间的距离)的数据不呈正态分布,两组间无显著差异(P=0.184):结论:这两种技术都可以牵引前牙和嘴唇,改善外形。结论:两种技术都能牵引前牙和嘴唇,但定制的舌侧矫治器对改善双颌牙槽突患者的软组织外形更有效,且疗程更短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
上海口腔医学
上海口腔医学 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5299
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信