Effects of inpatient rehabilitation after acute care on motor, neuropsychological and behavioral outcomes in children with severe traumatic brain injury.
Shiyao Gao, Amery Treble-Barna, Anthony Fabio, Sue R Beers, M Kathleen Kelly, Bedda L Rosario, Michael J Bell, Stephen R Wisniewski
{"title":"Effects of inpatient rehabilitation after acute care on motor, neuropsychological and behavioral outcomes in children with severe traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Shiyao Gao, Amery Treble-Barna, Anthony Fabio, Sue R Beers, M Kathleen Kelly, Bedda L Rosario, Michael J Bell, Stephen R Wisniewski","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2023.2297920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>An observational study of children with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) (Approaches and Decisions in Acute Pediatric TBI [ADAPT] Trial) demonstrated the benefits of inpatient rehabilitation on functional outcomes for those with more severely impaired consciousness when medically stable. We conducted a secondary analysis to assess whether using an inpatient rehabilitation or skilled nursing facility after acute hospitalization was associated with better motor, neuropsychological, and behavioral outcomes compared to receiving only non-inpatient rehabilitation among children with severe TBI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We included 180 children who used an inpatient rehabilitation or skilled nursing facility and 74 children who only received non-inpatient rehabilitation from the ADAPT trial. At 12 months post-injury, children underwent tests of motor skills, intellectual functioning, verbal learning, memory, processing speed, and cognitive flexibility. Parents/guardians rated children's executive function and behaviors. We performed inverse probability weighting to adjust for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found in any motor, neuropsychological, or behavioral measures between children receiving inpatient rehabilitation and children receiving only non-inpatient rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Analyses of comprehensive outcomes did not show differences between children receiving inpatient rehabilitation and children receiving only non-inpatient rehabilitation, suggesting a need for more research on specific components of the rehabilitation process.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"5270-5279"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2023.2297920","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: An observational study of children with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) (Approaches and Decisions in Acute Pediatric TBI [ADAPT] Trial) demonstrated the benefits of inpatient rehabilitation on functional outcomes for those with more severely impaired consciousness when medically stable. We conducted a secondary analysis to assess whether using an inpatient rehabilitation or skilled nursing facility after acute hospitalization was associated with better motor, neuropsychological, and behavioral outcomes compared to receiving only non-inpatient rehabilitation among children with severe TBI.
Materials and methods: We included 180 children who used an inpatient rehabilitation or skilled nursing facility and 74 children who only received non-inpatient rehabilitation from the ADAPT trial. At 12 months post-injury, children underwent tests of motor skills, intellectual functioning, verbal learning, memory, processing speed, and cognitive flexibility. Parents/guardians rated children's executive function and behaviors. We performed inverse probability weighting to adjust for potential confounders.
Results: No significant differences were found in any motor, neuropsychological, or behavioral measures between children receiving inpatient rehabilitation and children receiving only non-inpatient rehabilitation.
Conclusions: Analyses of comprehensive outcomes did not show differences between children receiving inpatient rehabilitation and children receiving only non-inpatient rehabilitation, suggesting a need for more research on specific components of the rehabilitation process.
期刊介绍:
Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.