Construction and comparative analysis of an environmental integration evaluation model for the Qingdao bathing beaches

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
An Zhang, Yinyin Zhou, Ni Zeng, Weizeng Shi, Fei Chen
{"title":"Construction and comparative analysis of an environmental integration evaluation model for the Qingdao bathing beaches","authors":"An Zhang, Yinyin Zhou, Ni Zeng, Weizeng Shi, Fei Chen","doi":"10.1007/s11852-023-01008-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As the most participatory place for coastal tourism, tourists’ comprehensive evaluation of the bathing beach is significant for its planning and management. This paper considers four bathing beaches in the Qingdao Seaside Scenery Spot as study areas. Through on-site inspections and questionnaire surveys, using statistical analysis software to compare the differences in demographic characteristics, time pattern characteristics and activity characteristics, analyzing population needs, and applying the entropy method, this study calculates the weights of the evaluation index series. An Environmental Integration Evaluation Model for the four bathing beaches is thus constructed, and the differences among the four evaluation models and weights are compared and analyzed. In addition, the study proposes design guidelines for suitability, people-orientation, and service offering. The following conclusions are drawn from the results: 1) the needs of users and the planning of the bathing beach influences the tourists choice for the beach; 2) the evaluation indicators with larger weight differences are planning and infrastructure, and the environmental elements with larger weight differences are natural environment, natural risks, vibrant landscapes, and convenience and service facilities; 3) Bathing beaches should enhance the attractiveness of the natural environment, improve the wind-wave safety warning system, enhance the participation of the site, optimize the traffic structure, and improve the service management level of the infrastructure.</p>","PeriodicalId":48909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Coastal Conservation","volume":"104 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Coastal Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-023-01008-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the most participatory place for coastal tourism, tourists’ comprehensive evaluation of the bathing beach is significant for its planning and management. This paper considers four bathing beaches in the Qingdao Seaside Scenery Spot as study areas. Through on-site inspections and questionnaire surveys, using statistical analysis software to compare the differences in demographic characteristics, time pattern characteristics and activity characteristics, analyzing population needs, and applying the entropy method, this study calculates the weights of the evaluation index series. An Environmental Integration Evaluation Model for the four bathing beaches is thus constructed, and the differences among the four evaluation models and weights are compared and analyzed. In addition, the study proposes design guidelines for suitability, people-orientation, and service offering. The following conclusions are drawn from the results: 1) the needs of users and the planning of the bathing beach influences the tourists choice for the beach; 2) the evaluation indicators with larger weight differences are planning and infrastructure, and the environmental elements with larger weight differences are natural environment, natural risks, vibrant landscapes, and convenience and service facilities; 3) Bathing beaches should enhance the attractiveness of the natural environment, improve the wind-wave safety warning system, enhance the participation of the site, optimize the traffic structure, and improve the service management level of the infrastructure.

Abstract Image

青岛海水浴场环境综合评价模型的构建与比较分析
作为滨海旅游最具参与性的场所,游客对海水浴场的综合评价对海水浴场的规划和管理具有重要意义。本文以青岛海滨风景名胜区的四个浴场为研究区域。通过实地考察和问卷调查,运用统计分析软件比较人口特征、时间模式特征和活动特征的差异,分析人群需求,运用熵值法计算评价指标系列的权重。由此构建了四个浴场的环境综合评价模型,并比较分析了四个评价模型和权重之间的差异。此外,本研究还提出了适宜性、以人为本和服务提供等方面的设计准则。研究结果得出以下结论:1)使用者的需求和海水浴场的规划影响着游客对海水浴场的选择;2)权重差异较大的评价指标是规划和基础设施,权重差异较大的环境要素是自然环境、自然风险、活力景观和便利服务设施;3)海水浴场应增强自然环境的吸引力,完善风浪安全预警系统,提高场地的参与性,优化交通结构,提高基础设施的服务管理水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Coastal Conservation
Journal of Coastal Conservation ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Coastal Conservation is a scientific journal for the dissemination of both theoretical and applied research on integrated and sustainable management of the terrestrial, coastal and marine environmental interface. A thorough understanding of both the physical and the human sciences is important to the study of the spatial patterns and processes observed in terrestrial, coastal and marine systems set in the context of past, present and future social and economic developments. This includes multidisciplinary and integrated knowledge and understanding of: physical geography, coastal geomorphology, sediment dynamics, hydrodynamics, soil science, hydrology, plant and animal ecology, vegetation science, biogeography, landscape ecology, recreation and tourism studies, urban and human ecology, coastal engineering and spatial planning, coastal zone management, and marine resource management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信