The Association between fatigue and physical activity in patients hospitalized with subacute stroke.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-30 DOI:10.1080/10749357.2023.2293337
Ayano Makihara, Masashi Kanai, Kazuhiro P Izawa, Hiroki Kubo, Asami Inamoto, Asami Ogura, Ikko Kubo, Shinichi Shimada
{"title":"The Association between fatigue and physical activity in patients hospitalized with subacute stroke.","authors":"Ayano Makihara, Masashi Kanai, Kazuhiro P Izawa, Hiroki Kubo, Asami Inamoto, Asami Ogura, Ikko Kubo, Shinichi Shimada","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2023.2293337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little is known about the association between fatigue and physical activity in patients hospitalized with subacute stroke.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the association between fatigue and physical activity in patients hospitalized with subacute stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study enrolled 244 consecutive patients with stroke who were admitted to a subacute rehabilitation ward at our hospital. We assessed fatigue with the Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) and used an accelerometer (Active style Pro HJA750-C, OMRON) to record the mean duration of sedentary behavior, light-intensity physical activity (LIPA), and moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA). We assessed all factors at 1 month after stroke. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed the associations between FASscore and objectively measured physical activity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, we analyzed 85 patients. The duration of the sedentary behavior was significantly associated with the FAS score (<i>β</i>  = 1.46, <i>p</i> = 0.037) and the Functional Balance Scale score (<i>β</i> = -1.35, <i>p</i> = 0.045). The LIPA time was significantly associated only with the FBS score (<i>β</i> = 1.38, <i>p</i> = 0.045), whereas MVPA was not associated with any variable.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"457-463"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2023.2293337","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the association between fatigue and physical activity in patients hospitalized with subacute stroke.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between fatigue and physical activity in patients hospitalized with subacute stroke.

Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled 244 consecutive patients with stroke who were admitted to a subacute rehabilitation ward at our hospital. We assessed fatigue with the Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) and used an accelerometer (Active style Pro HJA750-C, OMRON) to record the mean duration of sedentary behavior, light-intensity physical activity (LIPA), and moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA). We assessed all factors at 1 month after stroke. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed the associations between FASscore and objectively measured physical activity.

Results: In total, we analyzed 85 patients. The duration of the sedentary behavior was significantly associated with the FAS score (β  = 1.46, p = 0.037) and the Functional Balance Scale score (β = -1.35, p = 0.045). The LIPA time was significantly associated only with the FBS score (β = 1.38, p = 0.045), whereas MVPA was not associated with any variable.

亚急性脑卒中住院患者疲劳与体力活动之间的关系。
背景:亚急性脑卒中住院患者的疲劳与体力活动之间的关系鲜为人知:人们对亚急性脑卒中住院患者疲劳与体力活动之间的关系知之甚少:本研究旨在调查亚急性脑卒中住院患者疲劳与体力活动之间的关系:这项横断面研究连续纳入了 244 名在我院亚急性康复病房住院的脑卒中患者。我们使用疲劳评估量表(FAS)评估疲劳程度,并使用加速度计(Active style Pro HJA750-C,欧姆龙)记录久坐行为、轻度体力活动(LIPA)和中度至剧烈体力活动(MVPA)的平均持续时间。我们在中风后 1 个月对所有因素进行了评估。多变量线性回归分析显示了 FAS 评分与客观测量的体力活动之间的关系:结果:我们总共分析了 85 名患者。久坐行为的持续时间与 FAS 评分(β = 1.46,p = 0.037)和功能平衡量表评分(β = -1.35,p = 0.045)显著相关。LIPA 时间仅与 FBS 评分有明显相关性(β = 1.38,p = 0.045),而 MVPA 与任何变量均无相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues. The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信