Effects of Refined Handling on Reproductive Indices of BALB/cJ and CD-1 IGS Mice.

Margaret A Hull, Elizabeth A Nunamaker, Penny S Reynolds
{"title":"Effects of Refined Handling on Reproductive Indices of BALB/cJ and CD-1 IGS Mice.","authors":"Margaret A Hull, Elizabeth A Nunamaker, Penny S Reynolds","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-23-000028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current mouse handling methods during cage change procedures can cause stress and potentially compromise animal welfare. Our previous study of breeding C57BL/6J mice found modest increases in pup production and a significant reduction in preweaning litter losses when mice were handled using a tunnel as compared with a tail-lift with padded forceps. The current study evaluated how these 2 handling methods affected reproduction by 2 additional mouse strains, BALB/cJ (a low- to intermediate-fecundity strain) and CD-1 IGS (a high-fecundity stock). We predicted that refined handling would have minimal effects on the high-fecundity line with a satisfactory production rate and greater effects on the low-fecundity line. Handling method (tunnel compared with tail-lift) was randomly assigned to monogamous breeding pairs of mice. Reproductive metrics (litter size at birth and weaning, numbers of litters, litter attrition, between-litter intervals, pup wean- ing weight, and sex ratio) were prospectively monitored for 80 BALB/cJ and 77 CD-1 pairs that were bred continuously for 6 mo. Both strains of mice were highly productive, exceeding previously published breeding data. However, neither strain demonstrated operational or statistically significant differences between handling methods for any reproduction metric. As we detected no negative effects in these 2 strains and the benefits are clear in other strains, refined handling should be considered for all breeding mice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS","volume":" ","pages":"3-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10844741/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-23-000028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current mouse handling methods during cage change procedures can cause stress and potentially compromise animal welfare. Our previous study of breeding C57BL/6J mice found modest increases in pup production and a significant reduction in preweaning litter losses when mice were handled using a tunnel as compared with a tail-lift with padded forceps. The current study evaluated how these 2 handling methods affected reproduction by 2 additional mouse strains, BALB/cJ (a low- to intermediate-fecundity strain) and CD-1 IGS (a high-fecundity stock). We predicted that refined handling would have minimal effects on the high-fecundity line with a satisfactory production rate and greater effects on the low-fecundity line. Handling method (tunnel compared with tail-lift) was randomly assigned to monogamous breeding pairs of mice. Reproductive metrics (litter size at birth and weaning, numbers of litters, litter attrition, between-litter intervals, pup wean- ing weight, and sex ratio) were prospectively monitored for 80 BALB/cJ and 77 CD-1 pairs that were bred continuously for 6 mo. Both strains of mice were highly productive, exceeding previously published breeding data. However, neither strain demonstrated operational or statistically significant differences between handling methods for any reproduction metric. As we detected no negative effects in these 2 strains and the benefits are clear in other strains, refined handling should be considered for all breeding mice.

精细处理对 BALB/cJ 和 CD-1 IGS 小鼠生殖指数的影响
目前在换笼过程中处理小鼠的方法会造成应激,并可能损害动物福利。我们之前对繁殖 C57BL/6J 小鼠的研究发现,与使用带垫镊子的尾部提升法相比,使用隧道法处理小鼠可适度提高幼鼠产量,并显著减少断奶前的窝产仔损失。目前的研究评估了这两种处理方法对另外两个小鼠品系--BALB/cJ(中低繁殖力品系)和 CD-1 IGS(高繁殖力品系)繁殖的影响。我们预测,精细处理对繁殖率令人满意的高繁殖力品系影响最小,而对低繁殖力品系影响较大。处理方法(隧道与抬尾)被随机分配给一夫一妻制的繁殖小鼠对。对连续繁殖6个月的80对BALB/cJ和77对CD-1小鼠的繁殖指标(出生和断奶时的胎仔大小、胎仔数、胎仔损耗、胎仔间隔、幼仔断奶体重和性别比)进行了前瞻性监测。两个品系的小鼠都具有很高的繁殖能力,超过了之前公布的繁殖数据。然而,这两个品系在任何繁殖指标上的处理方法都没有表现出操作上或统计学上的显著差异。由于我们在这两个品系中没有检测到负面影响,而在其他品系中也有明显的益处,因此应考虑对所有繁殖小鼠进行精细化处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信