Thoracoscopic Stage Internal Traction Repair Reduces Time to Achieve Esophageal Continuity in Long Gap Esophageal Atresia.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
European Journal of Pediatric Surgery Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-28 DOI:10.1055/a-2235-8766
Dominika Borselle, Joseph Davidson, Stavros Loukogeorgakis, Paolo De Coppi, Dariusz Patkowski
{"title":"Thoracoscopic Stage Internal Traction Repair Reduces Time to Achieve Esophageal Continuity in Long Gap Esophageal Atresia.","authors":"Dominika Borselle, Joseph Davidson, Stavros Loukogeorgakis, Paolo De Coppi, Dariusz Patkowski","doi":"10.1055/a-2235-8766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> Management of long gap esophageal atresia (LGOA) is controversial. This study aims at comparing the management of LGOA between two high-volume centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> We included patients with LGOA (type A and B) between 2008 and 2022. Demographics, surgical methods, and outcomes were collected and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The study population involved 28 patients in center A and 24 patients in center B. A surgical approach was thoracoscopic in center A, only for one patient was open for final procedure. In center B, 3 patients were treated only thoracoscopically, 2 converted to open, and 19 as open surgery. In center A primary esophageal anastomosis concerned 1 case, two-staged esophageal lengthening using external traction 1 patient, and 26 were treated with the multistaged internal traction technique. In 24 patients a full anastomosis was achieved: in 23 patients only the internal traction technique was used, while 1 patient required open Collis-Nissen procedure as final management. In center B primary anastomosis was performed in 7 patients, delayed esophageal anastomosis in 8 patients, esophageal lengthening using external traction in 1 case, and 9 infants required esophageal replacement with gastric tube. Analyzed postoperative complications included: early mortality, 2/28 due to accompanied malformations (center A) and 0/24 (center B); anastomotic leakage, 4/26 (center A) treated conservatively-all patients had a contrast study-and 0/24 (center B), 1 case of pleural effusion, but no routine contrast study; recurrent strictures, 13/26 (center A) and 7/15 (center B); and need for fundoplication, 5/26 (center A) and 2/15 (center B). Age at esophageal continuity was as a median of 31 days in center A and 110 days in center B. Median time between initial procedure and esophageal anastomosis was 11 days in center A and 92 days in center B.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Thoracoscopic internal traction technique reduces time to achieve esophageal continuity and the need for esophageal substitution while maintaining a similar early complication rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":56316,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"36-43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2235-8766","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:  Management of long gap esophageal atresia (LGOA) is controversial. This study aims at comparing the management of LGOA between two high-volume centers.

Methods:  We included patients with LGOA (type A and B) between 2008 and 2022. Demographics, surgical methods, and outcomes were collected and compared.

Results:  The study population involved 28 patients in center A and 24 patients in center B. A surgical approach was thoracoscopic in center A, only for one patient was open for final procedure. In center B, 3 patients were treated only thoracoscopically, 2 converted to open, and 19 as open surgery. In center A primary esophageal anastomosis concerned 1 case, two-staged esophageal lengthening using external traction 1 patient, and 26 were treated with the multistaged internal traction technique. In 24 patients a full anastomosis was achieved: in 23 patients only the internal traction technique was used, while 1 patient required open Collis-Nissen procedure as final management. In center B primary anastomosis was performed in 7 patients, delayed esophageal anastomosis in 8 patients, esophageal lengthening using external traction in 1 case, and 9 infants required esophageal replacement with gastric tube. Analyzed postoperative complications included: early mortality, 2/28 due to accompanied malformations (center A) and 0/24 (center B); anastomotic leakage, 4/26 (center A) treated conservatively-all patients had a contrast study-and 0/24 (center B), 1 case of pleural effusion, but no routine contrast study; recurrent strictures, 13/26 (center A) and 7/15 (center B); and need for fundoplication, 5/26 (center A) and 2/15 (center B). Age at esophageal continuity was as a median of 31 days in center A and 110 days in center B. Median time between initial procedure and esophageal anastomosis was 11 days in center A and 92 days in center B.

Conclusion:  Thoracoscopic internal traction technique reduces time to achieve esophageal continuity and the need for esophageal substitution while maintaining a similar early complication rate.

胸腔镜阶段性内牵引修复术缩短了长间隙食道闭锁患者实现食道连续性的时间。
研究目的:长间隙食道闭锁(LGOA)的处理方法存在争议。本研究旨在比较两家大医院对长间隙食道闭锁的处理方法:我们纳入了2008年至2022年间的LGOA(A型和B型)患者。方法:我们纳入了2008年至2022年间的LGOA患者(A型和B型),收集并比较了人口统计学、手术方法和结果:研究对象包括28名患者(A中心)和24名患者(B中心)。A中心的手术方法是胸腔镜手术,只有一名患者的最终手术是开胸手术。在B中心,3名患者仅接受了胸腔镜治疗,2名患者转为开腹手术,19名患者接受了开腹手术。在 A 中心,1 名患者进行了食道吻合术,1 名患者使用外牵引进行了两阶段食道延长术,26 名患者使用了多阶段内牵引技术。在 24 名患者中实现了完全吻合:在 23 名患者中仅使用了内牵引技术,1 名患者最终需要进行开放式 Collis-Nissen 手术。在B中心,7名患者进行了初级吻合术,8名患者进行了延迟食道吻合术,1名患者使用外牵引进行了食道延长术,9名婴儿需要用胃管替代食道。分析的术后并发症包括:因伴随畸形导致的早期死亡-2/28(A中心)和0/24(B中心);吻合口漏-4/26(A中心),所有患者均接受了造影剂检查,0/24(B中心)-1例胸腔积液,但未进行常规造影剂检查);复发性狭窄-13/26(A中心)和7/15(B中心);需要胃底折叠术-5/26(A中心)和2/15(B中心)。食管吻合的中位年龄在 A 中心为 31 天,在 B 中心为 110 天。从初次手术到食管吻合的中位时间在 A 中心为 11 天,在 B 中心为 92 天:胸腔镜内牵引技术缩短了实现食道连续性的时间,减少了食道替代的需要,同时保持了相似的早期并发症发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This broad-based international journal updates you on vital developments in pediatric surgery through original articles, abstracts of the literature, and meeting announcements. You will find state-of-the-art information on: abdominal and thoracic surgery neurosurgery urology gynecology oncology orthopaedics traumatology anesthesiology child pathology embryology morphology Written by surgeons, physicians, anesthesiologists, radiologists, and others involved in the surgical care of neonates, infants, and children, the EJPS is an indispensable resource for all specialists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信