Poor accuracy of HbA1c for the diagnosis of prediabetes in overweight and obese Bangladeshi adults

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Tahniyah Haq, Md. Fariduddin, Md Abul Hasanat, Nishat Nayla Aurpa, Md. Sohel Rana Bhuiyan, Afia Zainab Tanni
{"title":"Poor accuracy of HbA1c for the diagnosis of prediabetes in overweight and obese Bangladeshi adults","authors":"Tahniyah Haq, Md. Fariduddin, Md Abul Hasanat, Nishat Nayla Aurpa, Md. Sohel Rana Bhuiyan, Afia Zainab Tanni","doi":"10.1007/s13410-023-01302-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background/Purpose</h3><p>The aim of the study was to assess the effect of obesity on the diagnostic accuracy of HbA1c.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This retrospective cross sectional study was conducted in 108 overweight/obese and 40 normal weight Bangladeshi adults. Those satisfying the exclusion and inclusion criteria were included. Diabetes and pre-diabetes were diagnosed by oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and HbA1c using the 2006 World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria. HbA1c was estimated by capillary electrophoresis method.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>108 overweight and obese (mean body mass index (BMI) 36.33 ± 8.86 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, mean age 29.12 ± 9.28 years) and 40 normal weight (mean BMI 20.35 ± 1.68 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, mean age 28.13 ± 6.22 years) adults were included in the study. Significantly greater number of patients were diagnosed with prediabetes using HbA1c criteria than OGTT criteria (39.68% vs 19.05%, <i>p</i> = 0.005) in overweight and obese group. The concordance between OGTT and HbA1c for the diagnosis of prediabetes was low in overweight and obese adults [Ƙ with 95%CI = 0.031(-0.194 to 0.256), n = 52]. The specificity and discrimination of HbA1c for the diagnosis of prediabetes were low in overweight and obese compared to normal weight group (52.3% vs 93.9%; 0.64 vs 0.89, <i>p</i> = 0.056, 95% CI = -0.01 to 0.51, respectively). The specificity of HbA1c for the diagnosis of prediabetes in adults with BMI ≥ 23 kg/m<sup>2</sup> increased to 90% at a cut-off of 6.15%.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>HbA1c was not accurate in the diagnosis of prediabetes in adults with BMI ≥ 23 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. A higher cut-off value for HbA1c should be used for the diagnosis of prediabetes, but not diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50328,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-023-01302-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Purpose

The aim of the study was to assess the effect of obesity on the diagnostic accuracy of HbA1c.

Methods

This retrospective cross sectional study was conducted in 108 overweight/obese and 40 normal weight Bangladeshi adults. Those satisfying the exclusion and inclusion criteria were included. Diabetes and pre-diabetes were diagnosed by oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and HbA1c using the 2006 World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria. HbA1c was estimated by capillary electrophoresis method.

Results

108 overweight and obese (mean body mass index (BMI) 36.33 ± 8.86 kg/m2, mean age 29.12 ± 9.28 years) and 40 normal weight (mean BMI 20.35 ± 1.68 kg/m2, mean age 28.13 ± 6.22 years) adults were included in the study. Significantly greater number of patients were diagnosed with prediabetes using HbA1c criteria than OGTT criteria (39.68% vs 19.05%, p = 0.005) in overweight and obese group. The concordance between OGTT and HbA1c for the diagnosis of prediabetes was low in overweight and obese adults [Ƙ with 95%CI = 0.031(-0.194 to 0.256), n = 52]. The specificity and discrimination of HbA1c for the diagnosis of prediabetes were low in overweight and obese compared to normal weight group (52.3% vs 93.9%; 0.64 vs 0.89, p = 0.056, 95% CI = -0.01 to 0.51, respectively). The specificity of HbA1c for the diagnosis of prediabetes in adults with BMI ≥ 23 kg/m2 increased to 90% at a cut-off of 6.15%.

Conclusion

HbA1c was not accurate in the diagnosis of prediabetes in adults with BMI ≥ 23 kg/m2. A higher cut-off value for HbA1c should be used for the diagnosis of prediabetes, but not diabetes.

Abstract Image

HbA1c 诊断孟加拉国超重和肥胖成年人糖尿病前期的准确性较低
背景/目的该研究旨在评估肥胖对 HbA1c 诊断准确性的影响。方法该回顾性横断面研究的对象是 108 名超重/肥胖和 40 名体重正常的孟加拉国成年人。符合排除和纳入标准的人被纳入研究。根据 2006 年世界卫生组织(WHO)的诊断标准,通过口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)和 HbA1c 诊断糖尿病和糖尿病前期。研究纳入了 108 名超重和肥胖(平均体重指数为 36.33 ± 8.86 kg/m2,平均年龄为 29.12 ± 9.28 岁)成人和 40 名体重正常(平均体重指数为 20.35 ± 1.68 kg/m2,平均年龄为 28.13 ± 6.22 岁)成人。在超重和肥胖组中,采用 HbA1c 标准诊断为糖尿病前期的患者人数明显多于 OGTT 标准(39.68% 对 19.05%,P = 0.005)。在超重和肥胖成人中,OGTT 和 HbA1c 诊断糖尿病前期的一致性较低[Ƙ,95%CI = 0.031(-0.194 至 0.256),n = 52]。与正常体重组相比,超重和肥胖组 HbA1c 对糖尿病前期诊断的特异性和区分度较低(分别为 52.3% vs 93.9%; 0.64 vs 0.89, p = 0.056, 95%CI = -0.01 to 0.51)。结论 HbA1c 不能准确诊断体重指数≥ 23 kg/m2 的成人糖尿病前期。在诊断糖尿病前期而非糖尿病时,应使用较高的 HbA1c 临界值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries is the official journal of Research Society for the Study of Diabetes in India. This is a peer reviewed journal and targets a readership consisting of clinicians, research workers, paramedical personnel, nutritionists and health care personnel working in the field of diabetes. Original research articles focusing on clinical and patient care issues including newer therapies and technologies as well as basic science issues in this field are considered for publication in the journal. Systematic reviews of interest to the above group of readers are also accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信