Prosecutors’ considerations when initiating plea bargaining

IF 1.8 4区 社会学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Casey N. Tisdale, Ashley M. Votruba
{"title":"Prosecutors’ considerations when initiating plea bargaining","authors":"Casey N. Tisdale,&nbsp;Ashley M. Votruba","doi":"10.1111/asap.12374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Prosecutors are the key decision-makers when it comes to plea bargaining, which is responsible for the resolution of about 90% of criminal cases. We distributed a mixed-method survey to a national sample of 180 prosecutors to ask about their key considerations when initiating and prosecuting a criminal case. Additionally, the survey asked prosecutors to provide any information they wanted to share regarding plea bargaining. We then conducted a qualitative content analysis to comprehensively identify the factors the prosecutors discussed. We found several factors that prosecutors take into consideration when starting to evaluate a criminal case: attributes of the criminal defendant (e.g., criminal history), victim input (e.g., victim wishes), and factors specific to the case (e.g., evidence strength). Further, when asked if they would like to share anything regarding plea bargaining, some prosecutors stressed the necessity of the plea system, some shared their punishment orientations, and others discussed how they determine punishment on a case-by-case basis. Overall, prosecutors tended to stress criminal history as largely influential in their plea decision-making. This study provides insight into prosecutorial plea bargain decision-making while providing opportunity for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"24 1","pages":"192-214"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/asap.12374","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asap.12374","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prosecutors are the key decision-makers when it comes to plea bargaining, which is responsible for the resolution of about 90% of criminal cases. We distributed a mixed-method survey to a national sample of 180 prosecutors to ask about their key considerations when initiating and prosecuting a criminal case. Additionally, the survey asked prosecutors to provide any information they wanted to share regarding plea bargaining. We then conducted a qualitative content analysis to comprehensively identify the factors the prosecutors discussed. We found several factors that prosecutors take into consideration when starting to evaluate a criminal case: attributes of the criminal defendant (e.g., criminal history), victim input (e.g., victim wishes), and factors specific to the case (e.g., evidence strength). Further, when asked if they would like to share anything regarding plea bargaining, some prosecutors stressed the necessity of the plea system, some shared their punishment orientations, and others discussed how they determine punishment on a case-by-case basis. Overall, prosecutors tended to stress criminal history as largely influential in their plea decision-making. This study provides insight into prosecutorial plea bargain decision-making while providing opportunity for future research.

Abstract Image

检察官在启动认罪求情协议时的考虑因素
检察官是认罪求情协议的主要决策者,约 90% 的刑事案件都是通过认罪求情协议解决的。我们向全国 180 名检察官发放了一份混合方法调查问卷,询问他们在提起和起诉刑事案件时的主要考虑因素。此外,调查还要求检察官提供他们想分享的有关辩诉交易的任何信息。然后,我们进行了定性内容分析,以全面确定检察官讨论的因素。我们发现检察官在开始评估刑事案件时会考虑以下几个因素:刑事被告的属性(如犯罪史)、受害人的意见(如受害人的意愿)以及案件的具体因素(如证据的强度)。此外,当被问及是否愿意分享有关认罪求情协议的内容时,一些检察官强调了认罪求情制度的必要性,一些检察官分享了他们的处罚取向,还有一些检察官讨论了他们如何根据具体案件决定处罚。总体而言,检察官倾向于强调犯罪史在很大程度上影响了他们的认罪求情决策。本研究为检察官的认罪求情协议决策提供了见解,同时也为今后的研究提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Recent articles in ASAP have examined social psychological methods in the study of economic and social justice including ageism, heterosexism, racism, sexism, status quo bias and other forms of discrimination, social problems such as climate change, extremism, homelessness, inter-group conflict, natural disasters, poverty, and terrorism, and social ideals such as democracy, empowerment, equality, health, and trust.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信