Scaling for social impact: understanding social innovation through local empowerment strategies

IF 2.8 Q2 BUSINESS
Istvan Rado, Prapin Nuchpiam
{"title":"Scaling for social impact: understanding social innovation through local empowerment strategies","authors":"Istvan Rado, Prapin Nuchpiam","doi":"10.1108/sej-04-2023-0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to provide a nuanced understanding of philosophies underpinning social innovation based on the action research strategies applied in the field.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Literature review was conducted to identify action research strategies referred to in the social innovation literature. Through stratified purposive sampling, the authors then selected nonprofit organizations, each closely associated with one of the strategies. Qualitative content analysis was applied to documents published by these organizations for an in-depth exploration of how the action research strategies frame the three dimensions of social innovation, namely, the product, process and empowerment dimensions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The authors identified four broad action research strategies referred to in the social innovation literature. Each strategy inspires four distinct narratives of social innovation centered around key concepts: prototyping, evidence, asset-building and co-creation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The methodology used is characterized by depth rather than scope. Although diverse types of documents were used, the documents are limited to publications by four institutions. A deductive approach using the categories should be used in future empirical research.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The paper contributes to the discussion about different schools and research agendas in the field of social innovation. In particular, the authors examine the action research strategies adopted in the field, shedding light on incompatible views and strategies within certain research clusters while identifying common ground between authors belonging to different schools.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":46809,"journal":{"name":"Social Enterprise Journal","volume":"149 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Enterprise Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sej-04-2023-0045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to provide a nuanced understanding of philosophies underpinning social innovation based on the action research strategies applied in the field.

Design/methodology/approach

Literature review was conducted to identify action research strategies referred to in the social innovation literature. Through stratified purposive sampling, the authors then selected nonprofit organizations, each closely associated with one of the strategies. Qualitative content analysis was applied to documents published by these organizations for an in-depth exploration of how the action research strategies frame the three dimensions of social innovation, namely, the product, process and empowerment dimensions.

Findings

The authors identified four broad action research strategies referred to in the social innovation literature. Each strategy inspires four distinct narratives of social innovation centered around key concepts: prototyping, evidence, asset-building and co-creation.

Research limitations/implications

The methodology used is characterized by depth rather than scope. Although diverse types of documents were used, the documents are limited to publications by four institutions. A deductive approach using the categories should be used in future empirical research.

Originality/value

The paper contributes to the discussion about different schools and research agendas in the field of social innovation. In particular, the authors examine the action research strategies adopted in the field, shedding light on incompatible views and strategies within certain research clusters while identifying common ground between authors belonging to different schools.

扩大社会影响:通过地方赋权战略了解社会创新
设计/方法/途径通过文献综述,作者确定了社会创新文献中提到的行动研究策略。通过分层有目的的抽样,作者选择了与其中一种策略密切相关的非营利组织。作者对这些组织发布的文件进行了定性内容分析,以深入探讨行动研究战略如何构建社会创新的三个维度,即产品、过程和赋权维度。每种策略都围绕着关键概念:原型设计、证据、资产建设和共同创造,激发了四种不同的社会创新叙事。虽然使用了各种类型的文件,但文件仅限于四个机构的出版物。在未来的实证研究中,应使用分类演绎法。本文有助于讨论社会创新领域的不同流派和研究议程。特别是,作者研究了该领域采用的行动研究策略,揭示了某些研究集群中不相容的观点和策略,同时找出了属于不同流派的作者之间的共同点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信