The equity of carbon emissions in international trade from the perspective of value added

IF 3.6 3区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Jingwen Kou, Weijing Ma, Chengyi Li, Haijiang Yang, Bing Xue, Xiaohua Gou
{"title":"The equity of carbon emissions in international trade from the perspective of value added","authors":"Jingwen Kou,&nbsp;Weijing Ma,&nbsp;Chengyi Li,&nbsp;Haijiang Yang,&nbsp;Bing Xue,&nbsp;Xiaohua Gou","doi":"10.1111/geoj.12572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>International trade drives the transboundary transfer of carbon emissions. However, due to the differences in the economic development level and industrial structure of countries, the whole understanding of the inequality exchange between carbon emissions and the value added remains to be illuminated. Here, to uncover the global pattern of this inequality exchange, we construct a multi-regional input–output model (MRIO) and inequality exchange index (IEI) from 1991 to 2016, to carry out macro path research with the goal of achieving global carbon neutrality. The results show that: (1) The carbon emissions per unit of value added through trade have declined in most countries, and the decline rate of developing countries was faster than that of developed ones. (2) In general, the developed countries were in an advantageous position in the value added and carbon emission exchange, while the developing countries were in a disadvantageous position. (3) Six sectors – agriculture, forestry, and animal husbandry; electrical and machinery; electricity, gas, and water; petroleum, chemical, and N-metallic mineral products; transport; and financial intermediation and business activities – accounted for more than half of the carbon emissions of global trade, but with the advancement of energy conservation and emission-reduction measures, carbon emissions have decreased to varying degrees. (4) From a global perspective, promoting cooperation on carbon reduction technologies from developed countries to developing ones might be a key and effective way to achieve global carbon reduction. The study aims to provide new insights into the formulation of global carbon neutrality and carbon emission responsibility-sharing policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48023,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Journal","volume":"190 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geoj.12572","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

International trade drives the transboundary transfer of carbon emissions. However, due to the differences in the economic development level and industrial structure of countries, the whole understanding of the inequality exchange between carbon emissions and the value added remains to be illuminated. Here, to uncover the global pattern of this inequality exchange, we construct a multi-regional input–output model (MRIO) and inequality exchange index (IEI) from 1991 to 2016, to carry out macro path research with the goal of achieving global carbon neutrality. The results show that: (1) The carbon emissions per unit of value added through trade have declined in most countries, and the decline rate of developing countries was faster than that of developed ones. (2) In general, the developed countries were in an advantageous position in the value added and carbon emission exchange, while the developing countries were in a disadvantageous position. (3) Six sectors – agriculture, forestry, and animal husbandry; electrical and machinery; electricity, gas, and water; petroleum, chemical, and N-metallic mineral products; transport; and financial intermediation and business activities – accounted for more than half of the carbon emissions of global trade, but with the advancement of energy conservation and emission-reduction measures, carbon emissions have decreased to varying degrees. (4) From a global perspective, promoting cooperation on carbon reduction technologies from developed countries to developing ones might be a key and effective way to achieve global carbon reduction. The study aims to provide new insights into the formulation of global carbon neutrality and carbon emission responsibility-sharing policies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

从附加值角度看国际贸易中的碳排放公平性
国际贸易推动了碳排放的跨境转移。然而,由于各国经济发展水平和产业结构的差异,对碳排放与增加值之间不平等交换的整体认识仍有待深入。在此,为了揭示这种不平等交换的全球模式,我们构建了1991-2016年多地区投入产出模型(MRIO)和不平等交换指数(IEI),以实现全球碳中和为目标开展宏观路径研究。研究结果表明(1)大多数国家通过贸易产生的单位增加值碳排放量有所下降,发展中国家的下降速度快于发达国家。(2)总体而言,发达国家在附加值和碳排放交换中处于优势地位,而发展中国家处于劣势地位。(3)农业、林业和畜牧业;电气和机械;电力、天然气和水;石油、化工和 N 金属矿产品;交通运输;金融中介和商业活动这六个部门的碳排放量占全球贸易碳排放量的一半以上,但随着节能减排措施的推进,碳排放量有不同程度的下降。 4)从全球角度看,促进发达国家与发展中国家的碳减排技术合作可能是实现全球碳减排的关键和有效途径。本研究旨在为制定全球碳中和与碳排放责任分担政策提供新的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Geographical Journal has been the academic journal of the Royal Geographical Society, under the terms of the Royal Charter, since 1893. It publishes papers from across the entire subject of geography, with particular reference to public debates, policy-orientated agendas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信