Optimization of a Protocol for Isolating Cell-free DNA From Cerebrospinal Fluid.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Annals of Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-28 DOI:10.3343/alm.2023.0267
Ho Hyun Song, Hyeran Park, Doohwan Cho, Hae In Bang, Hyuk-Jin Oh, Jieun Kim
{"title":"Optimization of a Protocol for Isolating Cell-free DNA From Cerebrospinal Fluid.","authors":"Ho Hyun Song, Hyeran Park, Doohwan Cho, Hae In Bang, Hyuk-Jin Oh, Jieun Kim","doi":"10.3343/alm.2023.0267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A standardized protocol for the isolation of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is lacking. Therefore, we established a cfDNA isolation protocol optimized for clinical CSF specimens, integrating acceptable modifications and using artificial CSF generated from remnant CSF spiked with reference cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA). We compared the isolation yields of <i>in vitro</i> diagnostic (IVD)-certified column-based (CB) and magnetic bead-based (MB) isolation. Furthermore, we modified both methods, including pre- and post-elution steps. To confirm ctDNA integrity and quantify the variant allele frequency after isolation, we performed droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) targeting <i>IDH1</i> R132C in the reference ctDNA. MB isolation had a higher yield than CB isolation (<i>P</i><0.0001), and post-isolation vacuum increased the final concentration in both methods, with little effect on cfDNA integrity. Our study provides a protocol to maximize CSF-ctDNA concentrations in IVD testing and future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8421,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"294-298"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10813833/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2023.0267","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A standardized protocol for the isolation of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is lacking. Therefore, we established a cfDNA isolation protocol optimized for clinical CSF specimens, integrating acceptable modifications and using artificial CSF generated from remnant CSF spiked with reference cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA). We compared the isolation yields of in vitro diagnostic (IVD)-certified column-based (CB) and magnetic bead-based (MB) isolation. Furthermore, we modified both methods, including pre- and post-elution steps. To confirm ctDNA integrity and quantify the variant allele frequency after isolation, we performed droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) targeting IDH1 R132C in the reference ctDNA. MB isolation had a higher yield than CB isolation (P<0.0001), and post-isolation vacuum increased the final concentration in both methods, with little effect on cfDNA integrity. Our study provides a protocol to maximize CSF-ctDNA concentrations in IVD testing and future studies.

优化从脑脊液中分离无细胞 DNA 的方案
目前还缺乏从脑脊液(CSF)中分离无细胞 DNA(cfDNA)的标准化方案。因此,我们建立了一个针对临床 CSF 标本进行优化的 cfDNA 分离方案,该方案整合了可接受的修改,并使用了由添加了无细胞肿瘤 DNA(ctDNA)参照物的残余 CSF 生成的人工 CSF。我们比较了体外诊断(IVD)认证的柱式分离(CB)和磁珠式分离(MB)的分离率。此外,我们还对这两种方法进行了改进,包括洗脱前和洗脱后步骤。为了确认ctDNA的完整性并量化分离后的变异等位基因频率,我们对参考ctDNA中的IDH1 R132C进行了液滴数字PCR(ddPCR)检测。与 CB 分离相比,MB 分离的产量更高(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Laboratory Medicine
Annals of Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
12.20%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Laboratory Medicine is the official journal of Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine. The journal title has been recently changed from the Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine (ISSN, 1598-6535) from the January issue of 2012. The JCR 2017 Impact factor of Ann Lab Med was 1.916.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信