Quantification of Artifacts and Image Distortions in 1.5 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Images of a Commercial Multi-Channel Vaginal Cylinder Brachytherapy Applicator Set.

Q3 Medicine
Abolfazl Kanani, Ali Fatemi-Ardakani, Amir M Owrangi, Mehran Yazdi, Hadi Baghbani, Mohammad Amin Mosleh-Shirazi
{"title":"Quantification of Artifacts and Image Distortions in 1.5 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Images of a Commercial Multi-Channel Vaginal Cylinder Brachytherapy Applicator Set.","authors":"Abolfazl Kanani, Ali Fatemi-Ardakani, Amir M Owrangi, Mehran Yazdi, Hadi Baghbani, Mohammad Amin Mosleh-Shirazi","doi":"10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2309-1665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The BEBIG Portio multi-channel applicator provides better target dose coverage and sparing organs-at-risk compared to a single-channel cylinder. However, artifacts and distortions of Portio in magnetic resonance images (MRI) have not yet been reported.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to quantify the artifacts and distortions in its 1.5-Tesla MR images before clinical use.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this experimental study, we employed a gelatin-filled phantom to conduct our measurements. T2-weighted (T2W) images were examined for artifacts and distortions. Computed tomography (CT) images were used as a reference to assess image distortions. Artifact severity was measured by recording the full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) image pixel values at various positions along the length of the applicator/channels. CT and MRI-based applicator reconstruction accuracy were then compared, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast were also determined for the applicator images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The applicator distortion level for the Portio applicator was less than the image spatial resolution (0.5±0.5 pixels). The average FWHM for the tandem applicator images was 5.23±0.39 mm, while it was 3.21±0.37 mm for all channels (compared to their actual diameters of 5.0 mm and 3.0 mm, respectively). The average applicator reconstruction difference between CT and MR images was 0.75±0.30 mm overall source dwell positions. The image SNR and contrast were both acceptable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings indicate that the Portio applicator has a satisfactory low level of artifacts and image distortions in 1.5-Tesla, T2W images. It may, therefore, be a promising option for MRI-guided multi-channel vaginal brachytherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":38035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10749412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2309-1665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The BEBIG Portio multi-channel applicator provides better target dose coverage and sparing organs-at-risk compared to a single-channel cylinder. However, artifacts and distortions of Portio in magnetic resonance images (MRI) have not yet been reported.

Objective: We aimed to quantify the artifacts and distortions in its 1.5-Tesla MR images before clinical use.

Material and methods: In this experimental study, we employed a gelatin-filled phantom to conduct our measurements. T2-weighted (T2W) images were examined for artifacts and distortions. Computed tomography (CT) images were used as a reference to assess image distortions. Artifact severity was measured by recording the full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) image pixel values at various positions along the length of the applicator/channels. CT and MRI-based applicator reconstruction accuracy were then compared, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast were also determined for the applicator images.

Results: The applicator distortion level for the Portio applicator was less than the image spatial resolution (0.5±0.5 pixels). The average FWHM for the tandem applicator images was 5.23±0.39 mm, while it was 3.21±0.37 mm for all channels (compared to their actual diameters of 5.0 mm and 3.0 mm, respectively). The average applicator reconstruction difference between CT and MR images was 0.75±0.30 mm overall source dwell positions. The image SNR and contrast were both acceptable.

Conclusion: These findings indicate that the Portio applicator has a satisfactory low level of artifacts and image distortions in 1.5-Tesla, T2W images. It may, therefore, be a promising option for MRI-guided multi-channel vaginal brachytherapy.

商用多通道阴道圆柱近距离治疗涂抹装置的 1.5 特斯拉磁共振成像中的伪影和图像畸变定量。
背景:与单通道圆筒相比,BEBIG Portio 多通道涂抹器能提供更好的靶剂量覆盖范围,并能保护危险器官。然而,Portio 在磁共振成像(MRI)中的伪影和失真尚未见报道:材料与方法:在这项实验研究中,我们使用了一个充满明胶的模型来进行测量。我们检查了 T2 加权(T2W)图像的伪影和失真。计算机断层扫描(CT)图像被用作评估图像失真的参考。通过记录沿涂抹器/通道长度方向不同位置的全宽半最大(FWHM)图像像素值来测量伪影的严重程度。然后比较了基于 CT 和 MRI 的涂抹器重建精度,并确定了涂抹器图像的信噪比(SNR)和对比度:结果:Portio 涂抹器的涂抹器失真度低于图像空间分辨率(0.5±0.5 像素)。串联涂抹器图像的平均全宽均方根(FWHM)为 5.23±0.39 毫米,而所有通道的全宽均方根(FWHM)为 3.21±0.37 毫米(实际直径分别为 5.0 毫米和 3.0 毫米)。CT 和 MR 图像的平均涂抹器重建差异为 0.75±0.30 毫米,总体源停留位置差异为 0.75±0.30 毫米。图像信噪比和对比度均可接受:这些研究结果表明,Portio 涂抹器在 1.5 特斯拉 T2W 图像中的伪影和图像失真程度较低,令人满意。结论:这些研究结果表明,Portio 应用器在 1.5-Tla T2W 图像中的伪影和图像失真程度较低,令人满意。因此,它可能是核磁共振成像引导的多通道阴道近距离治疗的一个有前途的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering (JBPE) is a bimonthly peer-reviewed English-language journal that publishes high-quality basic sciences and clinical research (experimental or theoretical) broadly concerned with the relationship of physics to medicine and engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信