Femoro-Epiphyseal Acetabular Roof Index Values on Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs Significantly Increase With Hip Adduction and Decrease With Abduction

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
{"title":"Femoro-Epiphyseal Acetabular Roof Index Values on Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs Significantly Increase With Hip Adduction and Decrease With Abduction","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2023.12.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p><span>To investigate the impact of hip adduction<span> and abduction on the femoro-epiphyseal acetabular roof (FEAR) index using conventional anteroposterior pelvic radiographs of patients with borderline </span></span>hip dysplasia (BHD).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with BHD (lateral center edge angle [LCEA] with values of 18° ≤ LCEA &lt;25°) and who were subject to periacetabular osteotoym were selected from a consecutive retrospective cohort from January 2009 to January 2016. The hip ad-/abduction (adduction handled as negative values) and the FEAR index (lateral opening angles handled as positive values) were measured in the initially standardized acquired pelvic radiographs. Thereafter, using surgical planning software, different degrees of hip adduction and abduction were simulated from 20° of adduction to 30° of abduction, and the FEAR index was measured at each position. Pearson correlation was used to identify a potential correlation between the hip ad-/abduction and the FEAR index.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eighty-nine hips were included. Initial radiographs showed unintentional mean ad-/abduction of –5.3° ± 3.1° (range, –14° to 2°). The mean FEAR index at the initial ad-/abduction angle was –3.6° ± 7.2° (range, –18.0° to 16.0°) and was significantly different from neutral position (0° of ad-/abduction) –9.2° ± 7.0° (range, –27.0° to 10.0°) (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). The FEAR index was negatively correlated to the hip ad-/abduction angle (r = 1, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), with lower values for the FEAR index with the hip in abduction.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Significant differences in FEAR index measurements were observed depending on hip ad-/abduction on pelvic radiographs. A linear change of the FEAR index of 5° per 5° of hip adduction or abduction could be demonstrated, with adduction resulting in increasing and abduction in decreasing values for the FEAR index.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>Level III, diagnostic study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806323010174","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the impact of hip adduction and abduction on the femoro-epiphyseal acetabular roof (FEAR) index using conventional anteroposterior pelvic radiographs of patients with borderline hip dysplasia (BHD).

Methods

Patients with BHD (lateral center edge angle [LCEA] with values of 18° ≤ LCEA <25°) and who were subject to periacetabular osteotoym were selected from a consecutive retrospective cohort from January 2009 to January 2016. The hip ad-/abduction (adduction handled as negative values) and the FEAR index (lateral opening angles handled as positive values) were measured in the initially standardized acquired pelvic radiographs. Thereafter, using surgical planning software, different degrees of hip adduction and abduction were simulated from 20° of adduction to 30° of abduction, and the FEAR index was measured at each position. Pearson correlation was used to identify a potential correlation between the hip ad-/abduction and the FEAR index.

Results

Eighty-nine hips were included. Initial radiographs showed unintentional mean ad-/abduction of –5.3° ± 3.1° (range, –14° to 2°). The mean FEAR index at the initial ad-/abduction angle was –3.6° ± 7.2° (range, –18.0° to 16.0°) and was significantly different from neutral position (0° of ad-/abduction) –9.2° ± 7.0° (range, –27.0° to 10.0°) (P < .001). The FEAR index was negatively correlated to the hip ad-/abduction angle (r = 1, P < .001), with lower values for the FEAR index with the hip in abduction.

Conclusions

Significant differences in FEAR index measurements were observed depending on hip ad-/abduction on pelvic radiographs. A linear change of the FEAR index of 5° per 5° of hip adduction or abduction could be demonstrated, with adduction resulting in increasing and abduction in decreasing values for the FEAR index.

Level of Evidence

Level III, diagnostic study.

骨盆前向X光片上的股骨骺髋臼顶(恐惧)指数值随髋关节内收而明显增加,随外展而减少
目的 通过对边缘性髋关节发育不良(BHD)患者进行传统的骨盆前向X光检查,研究髋关节内收和外展对股骨骺髋臼顶(FEAR)指数的影响。方法从2009年1月至2016年1月的连续回顾性队列中选取髋关节发育不良(外侧中心边缘角(LCEA)值为18° ≤ LCEA <25°)且接受髋臼周围截骨术(PAO)的患者。在最初获得的标准化骨盆X光片上测量了髋关节内收/外展(内收为负值)和FEAR指数(外侧开放角为正值)。然后,使用手术规划软件模拟髋关节从内收 20 度到外展 30 度的不同内收和外展程度,并测量每个位置的 FEAR 指数。皮尔逊相关性用于确定髋关节内收/外展与 FEAR 指数之间的潜在相关性。初始X光片显示,无意的平均内收/外展为-5.3 ± 3.1°(范围:-14至2°)。初始内收/外展角度下的平均 FEAR 指数为 -3.6 ± 7.2°(范围:-18.0 至 16.0°),与中立位(内收/外展 0°)相比有显著差异 -9.2 ± 7.0°(范围:-27.0 至 10.0°)(p < 0.001)。FEAR 指数与髋关节内收/外展角度呈负相关(r = 1,p < 0.001),髋关节外展时 FEAR 指数值较低。髋关节每内收或外展 5°,FEAR 指数就会发生 5°的线性变化,内收导致 FEAR 指数值增加,外展导致 FEAR 指数值减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信