Translation and psychometric testing of the Chinese version of the Perinatal Missed Care Survey

IF 2.9 3区医学 Q1 NURSING

International Journal of Nursing Sciences Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.12.006

Shenglan Ding , Xin Wang , Qingxia Wang , Juan Shen , Huili Xie , Xiujuan Fu , Luxi Liao , Jiaojiao Chen , Lian Zhu , Jing Huang , Siyuan Yang , Xiuhua Huang , Yilan Zhang

{"title":"Translation and psychometric testing of the Chinese version of the Perinatal Missed Care Survey","authors":"Shenglan Ding , Xin Wang , Qingxia Wang , Juan Shen , Huili Xie , Xiujuan Fu , Luxi Liao , Jiaojiao Chen , Lian Zhu , Jing Huang , Siyuan Yang , Xiuhua Huang , Yilan Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.12.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to translate and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Perinatal Missed Care Survey in China.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Perinatal Missed Care Survey was translated according to the guidelines of the cross-cultural debugging scale recommended by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Evidence-Based Medicine Committee, including forward translation, back translation, cultural adaption, and content validation, and its Chinese version was used in a cross-sectional study conducted from February to April in 2023. A total of 491 midwives from 14 different level hospitals in southwest China were recruited through a convenience sampling method. The discrimination ability of the items was tested through item analysis, and construct validity was assessed through exploratory factory and confirmatory factor analyses. The content validity index and Cronbach’s α coefficients evaluated content validity and reliability, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The Chinese version’s item–total correlation coefficients ranged from 0.641 to 0.866 in part A and from 0.644 to 0.819 in part B (<em>P</em> < 0.001). Parts A and B’s scale-level content validity indexes were 0.95, and the item-level content validity indexes were from 0.86 to 1.00. The three common factors of part A (necessary care, basic care, and postnatal care) and part B (communication, labor resources, and material resources) were extracted, accounting for 70.186% and 71.984% of the total variance, respectively. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the good fit of the three-factor models was acceptable. The Cronbach’s α coefficients were 0.968 (part A) and 0.940 (part B).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Chinese version of the Perinatal Missed Care Survey is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing nursing care missed by midwives during labor and birth and the reasons it was missed. Studies with large sample sizes are needed to verify the instrument’s applicability in China.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013223001485/pdfft?md5=e00f75b854af96f890024b5cc22afb10&pid=1-s2.0-S2352013223001485-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013223001485","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to translate and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Perinatal Missed Care Survey in China.

Methods

The Perinatal Missed Care Survey was translated according to the guidelines of the cross-cultural debugging scale recommended by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Evidence-Based Medicine Committee, including forward translation, back translation, cultural adaption, and content validation, and its Chinese version was used in a cross-sectional study conducted from February to April in 2023. A total of 491 midwives from 14 different level hospitals in southwest China were recruited through a convenience sampling method. The discrimination ability of the items was tested through item analysis, and construct validity was assessed through exploratory factory and confirmatory factor analyses. The content validity index and Cronbach’s α coefficients evaluated content validity and reliability, respectively.

Results

The Chinese version’s item–total correlation coefficients ranged from 0.641 to 0.866 in part A and from 0.644 to 0.819 in part B (P < 0.001). Parts A and B’s scale-level content validity indexes were 0.95, and the item-level content validity indexes were from 0.86 to 1.00. The three common factors of part A (necessary care, basic care, and postnatal care) and part B (communication, labor resources, and material resources) were extracted, accounting for 70.186% and 71.984% of the total variance, respectively. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the good fit of the three-factor models was acceptable. The Cronbach’s α coefficients were 0.968 (part A) and 0.940 (part B).

Conclusion

The Chinese version of the Perinatal Missed Care Survey is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing nursing care missed by midwives during labor and birth and the reasons it was missed. Studies with large sample sizes are needed to verify the instrument’s applicability in China.

查看原文本刊更多论文

围产期缺失护理调查中文版的翻译和心理测试

方法根据美国骨科医师学会循证医学委员会推荐的跨文化调试量表指南，对围产期漏诊调查进行翻译，包括正译、反译、文化适应和内容验证，并在2023年2月至4月进行的一项横断面研究中使用其中文版。研究采用便利抽样法，共招募了来自中国西南地区 14 家不同级别医院的 491 名助产士。通过题项分析检验了题项的区分能力，并通过探索性工厂分析和证实性因素分析评估了建构效度。结果中文版 A 部分的项目-总相关系数为 0.641-0.866，B 部分的项目-总相关系数为 0.644-0.819（P< 0.001）。A 部分和 B 部分的量表级内容效度指数为 0.95，项目级内容效度指数为 0.86 至 1.00。提取了 A 部分（必要护理、基本护理和产后护理）和 B 部分（沟通、劳动力资源和物质资源）的三个共同因子，分别占总方差的 70.186%和 71.984%。确认性因素分析表明，三因素模型的拟合度良好，可以接受。Cronbach'sα系数分别为0.968（A部分）和0.940（B部分）。要验证该工具在中国的适用性，还需要进行大样本量的研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Nursing Sciences Nursing-Nursing (all)

CiteScore

6.10

自引率

2.60%

发文量

408

审稿时长

25 days

期刊介绍： This journal aims to promote excellence in nursing and health care through the dissemination of the latest, evidence-based, peer-reviewed clinical information and original research, providing an international platform for exchanging knowledge, research findings and nursing practice experience. This journal covers a wide range of nursing topics such as advanced nursing practice, bio-psychosocial issues related to health, cultural perspectives, lifestyle change as a component of health promotion, chronic disease, including end-of-life care, family care giving. IJNSS publishes four issues per year in Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct. IJNSS intended readership includes practicing nurses in all spheres and at all levels who are committed to advancing practice and professional development on the basis of new knowledge and evidence; managers and senior members of the nursing; nurse educators and nursing students etc. IJNSS seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Contributions are welcomed from other health professions on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice.