Looming Cognitive Style: How It Mediates the Association of Harm Avoidance with Trait and State Emotion Regulation Difficulties

IF 1.5 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Ayşe Altan-Atalay, Ceren Gökdağ, Naz King, Selin Tezel, Yaren Sözeri
{"title":"Looming Cognitive Style: How It Mediates the Association of Harm Avoidance with Trait and State Emotion Regulation Difficulties","authors":"Ayşe Altan-Atalay, Ceren Gökdağ, Naz King, Selin Tezel, Yaren Sözeri","doi":"10.1007/s41811-023-00197-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding the factors that are associated with individual differences in emotion regulation (ER) difficulties, which is one of the common transdiagnostic factors underlying many psychological disorders, is crucial for understanding and treating psychological disorders. The aim of the two investigations was to examine the mediator role of looming cognitive style (LCS) in the relationship of harm avoidance (HA) with both state and trait forms of ER difficulty. A total of 362 adults participated in Study 1 and 236 adults in Study 2. They completed measurements of HA, LCS, and ER. In Study 2, participants were induced into an anxious mood state and filled out a scale measuring ER in that process. Path analysis demonstrated that social looming between HA and trait ER and physical looming between HA and state ER had mediator roles. Finally, the alternative models which included HA and ER as the outcomes yielded poor fit. The results revealed that LCS significantly mediated the relationship of HA with both trait and state forms of ER difficulty, providing support for the model that aimed to explain how LCS contributes to the development and maintenance of psychological disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":46972,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cognitive Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cognitive Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41811-023-00197-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the factors that are associated with individual differences in emotion regulation (ER) difficulties, which is one of the common transdiagnostic factors underlying many psychological disorders, is crucial for understanding and treating psychological disorders. The aim of the two investigations was to examine the mediator role of looming cognitive style (LCS) in the relationship of harm avoidance (HA) with both state and trait forms of ER difficulty. A total of 362 adults participated in Study 1 and 236 adults in Study 2. They completed measurements of HA, LCS, and ER. In Study 2, participants were induced into an anxious mood state and filled out a scale measuring ER in that process. Path analysis demonstrated that social looming between HA and trait ER and physical looming between HA and state ER had mediator roles. Finally, the alternative models which included HA and ER as the outcomes yielded poor fit. The results revealed that LCS significantly mediated the relationship of HA with both trait and state forms of ER difficulty, providing support for the model that aimed to explain how LCS contributes to the development and maintenance of psychological disorders.

Abstract Image

迫在眉睫的认知风格:它如何调节伤害规避与特质和状态情绪调节困难之间的关系
情绪调节(ER)困难是许多心理障碍的共同跨诊断因素之一,了解情绪调节困难个体差异的相关因素对于理解和治疗心理障碍至关重要。这两项研究旨在探讨隐约认知风格(LCS)在伤害回避(HA)与情绪调节困难的状态和特质形式之间的中介作用。共有 362 名成年人参与了研究 1,236 名成年人参与了研究 2。他们完成了对 HA、LCS 和 ER 的测量。在研究 2 中,参与者被诱导进入焦虑情绪状态,并在此过程中填写了测量 ER 的量表。路径分析表明,HA 和特质焦虑情绪之间的社会隐患以及 HA 和状态焦虑情绪之间的身体隐患具有中介作用。最后,将 HA 和 ER 作为结果的替代模型的拟合效果不佳。结果显示,LCS对HA与ER困难的特质和状态形式之间的关系有明显的中介作用,为旨在解释LCS如何导致心理障碍的发展和维持的模型提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: From an editorial board of leading international authorities, this state-of-the-science journal addresses all scientific and clinical aspects of cognitive therapy. Featured are: Empirical research studies Cutting-edge theoretical articles Literature reviews and meta-analyses Special focus issues The scope of coverage encompasses basic research on cognitive clinical processes, innovative assessment and treatment technologies, expert perspectives on specific clinical problems and populations, and critical issues in translating research to practice. Recent thematic issues have included Recent Advances in Suicide Research: Mediators and Moderators of Risk and Resilience; Cognitive Mechanisms of Change in the Treatment of Depression; and Combined CBT and Pharmacotherapy.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信