EU green deal: between ecological transition and the struggle for power maintenance

Gaia Hasse
{"title":"EU green deal: between ecological transition and the struggle for power maintenance","authors":"Gaia Hasse","doi":"10.51799/2763-8685v3n2010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental, social, humanitarian, and economic crises are part of the contemporary world. The exceeding of Earth's limits manifests in various ways, including climate change, whose effects are already impacting various regions of the planet. Although this issue has been discussed for decades and subject to extensive international legal regulation, there are areas with significant potential for mitigation and adaptation to climate change that remain relatively unexplored. While traditional international trade arrangements are insufficient to promote well-being and the preservation of life on Earth, there is fertile ground for collaboration between international trade and climate change regimes. The European Green Deal, launched as a political project for ecological transition, has economic and trade-related objectives and implications. That stated, the overall objective of this research is to uncover the inconsistencies of the European Green Deal concerning ecological law parameters and its implications for global trade. This is a bibliographical research with descriptive purpose, deductive approach, and axiological interpretation. From the analysis of the European Green Deal based on selected parameters of ecological law, it was found that, although it reflects progress in the implementation of ecological law, the political project serves as a mechanism for maintaining power, reproducing the dominant capitalist logic, which diminishes its own transformative potential in the transition to an ecological paradigm.","PeriodicalId":171261,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Journal of European Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Journal of European Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51799/2763-8685v3n2010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental, social, humanitarian, and economic crises are part of the contemporary world. The exceeding of Earth's limits manifests in various ways, including climate change, whose effects are already impacting various regions of the planet. Although this issue has been discussed for decades and subject to extensive international legal regulation, there are areas with significant potential for mitigation and adaptation to climate change that remain relatively unexplored. While traditional international trade arrangements are insufficient to promote well-being and the preservation of life on Earth, there is fertile ground for collaboration between international trade and climate change regimes. The European Green Deal, launched as a political project for ecological transition, has economic and trade-related objectives and implications. That stated, the overall objective of this research is to uncover the inconsistencies of the European Green Deal concerning ecological law parameters and its implications for global trade. This is a bibliographical research with descriptive purpose, deductive approach, and axiological interpretation. From the analysis of the European Green Deal based on selected parameters of ecological law, it was found that, although it reflects progress in the implementation of ecological law, the political project serves as a mechanism for maintaining power, reproducing the dominant capitalist logic, which diminishes its own transformative potential in the transition to an ecological paradigm.
欧盟绿色协议:生态转型与权力维护之争
环境、社会、人道主义和经济危机是当代世界的一部分。超过地球极限的表现形式多种多样,其中包括气候变化,其影响已经波及地球上的各个地区。虽然这个问题已经讨论了几十年,并受到广泛的国际法律监管,但在减缓和适应气候变化方面,仍有一些领域具有巨大潜力,但相对而言,这些领域仍未得到开发。虽然传统的国际贸易安排不足以促进福祉和保护地球上的生命,但国际贸易与气候变化制度之间存在着合作的沃土。作为生态转型政治项目启动的欧洲绿色协议,具有与经济和贸易相关的目标和影响。因此,本研究的总体目标是揭示欧洲绿色协议在生态法律参数方面的不一致之处及其对全球贸易的影响。这是一项具有描述目的、演绎方法和公理解释的文献研究。通过根据选定的生态法参数对《欧洲绿色协议》进行分析,我们发现,虽然该协议反映了在实施生态法方面取得的进展,但这一政治项目充当了维持权力的机制,复制了占主导地位的资本主义逻辑,削弱了其自身在向生态范式过渡中的变革潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信