The power threat meaning framework and people with learning disabilities: Psychological professionals’ perspectives

Megan Levington
{"title":"The power threat meaning framework and people with learning disabilities: Psychological professionals’ perspectives","authors":"Megan Levington","doi":"10.53841/bpsfpid.2023.21.3.69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The systematic review aimed to identify whether changes in adaptive behaviour occur as people with Down Syndrome (DS) age, and if so, when and how these changes occur. Both longitudinal and cross-sectional observational studies were included, if they reported on how adaptive behaviour outcomes change with age, for DS participants older than 30. In 2022, a search of three databases (Pubmed, Web of Science, PsycInfo), a database for unpublished theses (ERIC) and reference lists, found 26 eligible studies. Quality assessment revealed considerable bias in at least 5 studies. Given the extensive heterogeneity amongst studies, thematic synthesis was chosen to synthesise the study findings. Tentative results -reveal that declines occur for adaptive behaviour skills after the mid-40s, akin to dementia neuropathology and cognitive declines, with motor skills and receptive language declining first. However, both intra- and inter-individual differences were found, which supports the evidence that dementia in DS is not a normative process and baseline assessments should be utilised to support diagnoses. Other factors such as comorbidities and residential status did not appear to affect declines. Adaptive behaviour assessments should aim to be specific and sensitive to individual baseline functions to avoid ‘floor’ effects, however such measures may be superior to cognitive tests in supporting early detection of dementia in more profoundly intellectually disabled (ID) groups. More research is required to further these findings.","PeriodicalId":302131,"journal":{"name":"FPID Bulletin: The Bulletin of the Faculty for People with Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"534 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FPID Bulletin: The Bulletin of the Faculty for People with Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsfpid.2023.21.3.69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The systematic review aimed to identify whether changes in adaptive behaviour occur as people with Down Syndrome (DS) age, and if so, when and how these changes occur. Both longitudinal and cross-sectional observational studies were included, if they reported on how adaptive behaviour outcomes change with age, for DS participants older than 30. In 2022, a search of three databases (Pubmed, Web of Science, PsycInfo), a database for unpublished theses (ERIC) and reference lists, found 26 eligible studies. Quality assessment revealed considerable bias in at least 5 studies. Given the extensive heterogeneity amongst studies, thematic synthesis was chosen to synthesise the study findings. Tentative results -reveal that declines occur for adaptive behaviour skills after the mid-40s, akin to dementia neuropathology and cognitive declines, with motor skills and receptive language declining first. However, both intra- and inter-individual differences were found, which supports the evidence that dementia in DS is not a normative process and baseline assessments should be utilised to support diagnoses. Other factors such as comorbidities and residential status did not appear to affect declines. Adaptive behaviour assessments should aim to be specific and sensitive to individual baseline functions to avoid ‘floor’ effects, however such measures may be superior to cognitive tests in supporting early detection of dementia in more profoundly intellectually disabled (ID) groups. More research is required to further these findings.
权力威胁意义框架与学习障碍者:心理专业人士的观点
系统综述旨在确定唐氏综合症(DS)患者的适应行为是否会随着年龄的增长而发生变化,如果会,这些变化会在何时以及如何发生。纵向和横断面观察性研究,只要报告了唐氏综合症患者随着年龄的增长,适应行为结果会发生怎样的变化,均被纳入研究范围。2022 年,通过对三个数据库(Pubmed、Web of Science、PsycInfo)、一个未发表论文数据库(ERIC)和参考文献目录的检索,发现了 26 项符合条件的研究。质量评估显示,至少有 5 项研究存在相当大的偏差。鉴于研究之间存在广泛的异质性,我们选择了专题综合法来综合研究结果。初步结果显示,适应行为能力在 40 岁以后出现下降,这与痴呆症的神经病理学和认知能力下降相似,运动能力和接受性语言能力首先下降。然而,研究还发现了个体内部和个体之间的差异,这证明了 DS 痴呆症不是一个正常的过程,应利用基线评估来支持诊断。合并症和居住状况等其他因素似乎并不影响痴呆程度的下降。适应行为评估的目标应该是对个体基线功能具有特异性和敏感性,以避免 "底线 "效应,然而,在支持早期发现智力残障程度更深的群体(ID)的痴呆症方面,此类测量可能优于认知测试。还需要更多的研究来进一步证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信