EC conversion for 1:5 extracts and standard saturated soil–water pastes in the assessment of arid land salinization: Classical methodologies revisited

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Andrey Smagin , Anvar Kacimov , Nadezhda Sadovnikova
{"title":"EC conversion for 1:5 extracts and standard saturated soil–water pastes in the assessment of arid land salinization: Classical methodologies revisited","authors":"Andrey Smagin ,&nbsp;Anvar Kacimov ,&nbsp;Nadezhda Sadovnikova","doi":"10.1016/j.jssas.2023.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The common assessment of soil salinity posits a linear function, which transfers the electrical conductivity (EC) of highly diluted extracts to the standard state of soil paste. Our study examines this assumption and explains its limitations in a wide range of EC for highly saline soils of the Aral region in Uzbekistan. For a comparative EC assessment in the liquid phase from standard soil pastes and 1:5 aqueous extracts we used portable EC–meters. The dependences of EC, total dissolved solids (TDS), and soil–water potential on the pore water content were evaluated using centrifugation to separate the liquid phase from the soil matrix. The non-linearity of the relationship between the EC of water from soil pastes and 1:5 water extracts for both average and median data over a broad (0.4–160 dS/m) range of their variation is detected. A strong retention and concentration of electrolytes in fine pores and water films resistant to vacuum extraction, as well as the nonlinear EC versus TDS relationship in highly saline soils are attributed to this nonlinearity. A comprehensive statistical analysis showed that despite the general non-linearity, in the EC range from 0 to 30–35 dS/m, the results for 1:5 extract can be reliably converted to the standard state using the dilution model for the liquid phase of the soil with one basic parameter of soil bulk density. For hypersaline soils (EC &gt; 30–35 dS/m), conversion based on the dilution theory is unacceptable due to a strong underestimation of TDS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17560,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1658077X23001261/pdfft?md5=cc1a7043e5dcce944678902f71c2537b&pid=1-s2.0-S1658077X23001261-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1658077X23001261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The common assessment of soil salinity posits a linear function, which transfers the electrical conductivity (EC) of highly diluted extracts to the standard state of soil paste. Our study examines this assumption and explains its limitations in a wide range of EC for highly saline soils of the Aral region in Uzbekistan. For a comparative EC assessment in the liquid phase from standard soil pastes and 1:5 aqueous extracts we used portable EC–meters. The dependences of EC, total dissolved solids (TDS), and soil–water potential on the pore water content were evaluated using centrifugation to separate the liquid phase from the soil matrix. The non-linearity of the relationship between the EC of water from soil pastes and 1:5 water extracts for both average and median data over a broad (0.4–160 dS/m) range of their variation is detected. A strong retention and concentration of electrolytes in fine pores and water films resistant to vacuum extraction, as well as the nonlinear EC versus TDS relationship in highly saline soils are attributed to this nonlinearity. A comprehensive statistical analysis showed that despite the general non-linearity, in the EC range from 0 to 30–35 dS/m, the results for 1:5 extract can be reliably converted to the standard state using the dilution model for the liquid phase of the soil with one basic parameter of soil bulk density. For hypersaline soils (EC > 30–35 dS/m), conversion based on the dilution theory is unacceptable due to a strong underestimation of TDS.

干旱土地盐碱化评估中 1:5 提取物和标准饱和土壤-水浆的导电率换算:经典方法再探讨
土壤盐度的常见评估方法是假设一个线性函数,将高度稀释提取物的导电率(EC)转换为土壤膏体的标准状态。我们的研究对这一假设进行了检验,并解释了其在乌兹别克斯坦咸海地区高盐度土壤的广泛导电率范围内的局限性。为了对标准土壤膏和 1:5 水提取物的液相导电率进行比较评估,我们使用了便携式导电率测量仪。通过离心分离液相与土壤基质,评估了导电率、溶解性总固体(TDS)和土壤水势与孔隙水含量的关系。在广泛(0.4-160 dS/m)的变化范围内,检测到土壤糊状物和 1:5 水提取物的平均和中位数数据的导电率之间存在非线性关系。电解质在细孔和耐真空萃取的水膜中的强烈滞留和富集,以及高盐度土壤中导电率与 TDS 的非线性关系都归因于这种非线性。综合统计分析表明,尽管存在普遍的非线性,但在导电率从 0 到 30-35 dS/m 的范围内,1:5 萃取的结果可以通过土壤容重这一基本参数,利用土壤液相稀释模型可靠地转换为标准状态。对于高盐度土壤(EC > 30-35 dS/m),由于 TDS 被严重低估,基于稀释理论的转换是不可接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences
Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences is an English language, peer-review scholarly publication which publishes research articles and critical reviews from every area of Agricultural sciences and plant science. Scope of the journal includes, Agricultural Engineering, Plant production, Plant protection, Animal science, Agricultural extension, Agricultural economics, Food science and technology, Soil and water sciences, Irrigation science and technology and environmental science (soil formation, biological classification, mapping and management of soil). Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences publishes 4 issues per year and is the official publication of the King Saud University and Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences and is published by King Saud University in collaboration with Elsevier and is edited by an international group of eminent researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信