{"title":"Organizational design based on Holacracy as a source of competitive advantage","authors":"Horymír Kalmus, Marek Vochozka, Ivo Formánek","doi":"10.9770/jesi.2023.11.2(24)","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". This study aimed to investigate the extent to which an agile and flat organizational design based on Holacracy can bring a company a competitive advantage in the market. Holacracy design is considered to be a Dynamic Capability. The research was conducted as a case study of a flatly organized company operating in the field of designing and supplying technologies for industrial automation in the Czech Republic. Interviews with company executives and questionnaires were used to gather their opinions on the company's ability to have a competitive advantage. The questionnaire included a guiding question and four statements about their truthfulness on a 5-point Likert scale. The first group of statements assessed the extent of the company's ability to exploit market opportunities. This ability was rated as average to slightly above average. The second group of statements assessed the extent of the company's ability to neutralize competitive threats. Here, a rather average to slightly below-average level was found. This research found that the innovative Holacracy design may not be able to create a competitive advantage if a company operates in a highly competitive and price-sensitive industry. Companies' efforts to achieve above-average performance thus remain primarily a matter of appropriate pricing, well-managed costs, and the ability to differentiate more than dynamic or agile organizational capabilities. The limitations of this research were mainly the small number of similarly organized companies operating in the same industry and the small base of companies of similar size and structure.","PeriodicalId":47127,"journal":{"name":"Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues","volume":"472 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2023.11.2(24)","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
. This study aimed to investigate the extent to which an agile and flat organizational design based on Holacracy can bring a company a competitive advantage in the market. Holacracy design is considered to be a Dynamic Capability. The research was conducted as a case study of a flatly organized company operating in the field of designing and supplying technologies for industrial automation in the Czech Republic. Interviews with company executives and questionnaires were used to gather their opinions on the company's ability to have a competitive advantage. The questionnaire included a guiding question and four statements about their truthfulness on a 5-point Likert scale. The first group of statements assessed the extent of the company's ability to exploit market opportunities. This ability was rated as average to slightly above average. The second group of statements assessed the extent of the company's ability to neutralize competitive threats. Here, a rather average to slightly below-average level was found. This research found that the innovative Holacracy design may not be able to create a competitive advantage if a company operates in a highly competitive and price-sensitive industry. Companies' efforts to achieve above-average performance thus remain primarily a matter of appropriate pricing, well-managed costs, and the ability to differentiate more than dynamic or agile organizational capabilities. The limitations of this research were mainly the small number of similarly organized companies operating in the same industry and the small base of companies of similar size and structure.
期刊介绍:
ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES ISSN 2345-0282 (online) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, serving as a platform to foster multi/interdisciplinary innovations that bring together the research communities and the end-users being affected. It is where theory meets practice, evident in the authors being experts across the industrial value chain – including business visionaries, regulatory and standards bodies, and especially pan-European networking through public and private sector partnerships (PPPs). Accepted papers present outcomes of initiatives and findings across all fields of science and technology, especially social sciences and humanities. Multi/interdisciplinary approach is encouraged. Recent additions to the already well-accomplished editorial board includes experts from the energy and information and communication technologies (ICT) sectors, particularly focused on advances to the state of the arts in environmental sustainability developments. This journal publishes original research papers that are rich with case studies of modern demonstrations, presenting innovative solutions to socio-economic and socio-technical problems that plague modern societies. It is a journal that is positioned as collaborative platform where theory meets practice, which is accomplished by publishing authors who’ve uncovered new linkages between data formulation and the underpinning theories, cases, observations, and validated hypotheses arising from the analysis of that data. ESI journal scope includes as well a particular focus on the business development side of smart electricity grids regarding financial or innovative technological aspects surrounding: renewable production, energy storage and management, construction materials, retrofitting, urban planning, and the trading of actors within emerging markets affected by energy supply and demand tradeoff.