Possibility to determine the necessary length of WRC survey routes based on the area of hunting grounds

I. A. Kondratenkov
{"title":"Possibility to determine the necessary length of WRC survey routes based on the area of hunting grounds","authors":"I. A. Kondratenkov","doi":"10.35885/1684-7318-2023-4-437-453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article 36 of the Federal Law on Hunting and Conservation of Hunting Resources of 24.07.2009 No. 209-FZ (in the edition of the Federal Law of 22.12.2020 No. 455-FZ) stipulates that the accounting of hunting animals, in respect of which, in accordance with the above Federal Law, the limit of extraction and the quota of their extraction are established, is carried out on the basis of scientifically substantiated methods. Currently recommended by the authorized federal executive body and posted on the information and telecommunication network “Internet” on the official website of the authorized federal executive body is the Methodology of accounting for the number of hunting resources by the method of winter route counting, approved by the order of FGBU “Federal Research Center for Hunting” from November 14, 2022 no. 74. One of the main differences of the mentioned methodology is the algorithm of determining the minimum necessary total length of counting routes from the total area of hunting grounds located within the boundaries of the relevant hunting farms. However, in the open press there are no data on the conducted scientific studies justifying such an approach to determining the necessary length of survey routes. This was the basis for the present study. On the example of moose counting for some hunting farms of Saratov region the possibility of objective determination of the minimum necessary total length of counting routes depending on the total area of hunting grounds located within the boundaries of these farms was checked. The results of the study showed that such an approach in planning the volume of survey work is fundamentally flawed and cannot be considered scientifically justified, and since it takes the central place in the considered Methodology of counting the number of hunting resources by the method of winter route counting, the latter is scientifically unjustified. Consequently, its placement in the information and telecommunication network “Internet” on the official website of the authorized federal executive body contradicts the current legislation of the Russian Federation in the field of hunting and conservation of hunting resources. ","PeriodicalId":409252,"journal":{"name":"Povolzhskiy Journal of Ecology","volume":"41 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Povolzhskiy Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35885/1684-7318-2023-4-437-453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Article 36 of the Federal Law on Hunting and Conservation of Hunting Resources of 24.07.2009 No. 209-FZ (in the edition of the Federal Law of 22.12.2020 No. 455-FZ) stipulates that the accounting of hunting animals, in respect of which, in accordance with the above Federal Law, the limit of extraction and the quota of their extraction are established, is carried out on the basis of scientifically substantiated methods. Currently recommended by the authorized federal executive body and posted on the information and telecommunication network “Internet” on the official website of the authorized federal executive body is the Methodology of accounting for the number of hunting resources by the method of winter route counting, approved by the order of FGBU “Federal Research Center for Hunting” from November 14, 2022 no. 74. One of the main differences of the mentioned methodology is the algorithm of determining the minimum necessary total length of counting routes from the total area of hunting grounds located within the boundaries of the relevant hunting farms. However, in the open press there are no data on the conducted scientific studies justifying such an approach to determining the necessary length of survey routes. This was the basis for the present study. On the example of moose counting for some hunting farms of Saratov region the possibility of objective determination of the minimum necessary total length of counting routes depending on the total area of hunting grounds located within the boundaries of these farms was checked. The results of the study showed that such an approach in planning the volume of survey work is fundamentally flawed and cannot be considered scientifically justified, and since it takes the central place in the considered Methodology of counting the number of hunting resources by the method of winter route counting, the latter is scientifically unjustified. Consequently, its placement in the information and telecommunication network “Internet” on the official website of the authorized federal executive body contradicts the current legislation of the Russian Federation in the field of hunting and conservation of hunting resources. 
根据狩猎场面积确定 WRC 勘测路线所需长度的可能性
2009年7月24日第209-FZ号《关于狩猎和保护狩猎资源的联邦法》(2020年12月22日第455-FZ号联邦法版本)第36条规定,根据上述联邦法规定的狩猎限额和狩猎配额,对狩猎动物的核算应根据有科学依据的方法进行。目前,由联邦授权执行机构推荐并在联邦授权执行机构官方网站的信息和电信网络 "因特网 "上公布的是通过冬季路线计数法计算狩猎资源数量的方法,该方法由联邦狩猎研究中心(FGBU)2022 年 11 月 14 日第 74 号命令批准。上述方法的主要区别之一,是根据相关狩猎场范围内的狩猎场总面积确定计数路线最小必要总长度的算法。然而,在公开出版物中,没有任何科学研究数据证明这种确定必要调查路线长度的方法是合理的。这就是本研究的基础。以萨拉托夫州一些狩猎场的驼鹿计数为例,研究了根据这些狩猎场范围内的狩猎场总面积客观确定计数路线最小必要总长度的可能性。研究结果表明,这种规划调查工作量的方法存在根本性缺陷,不能被视为科学合理,而且由于它在通过冬季路线计数法计算狩猎资源数量的方法论中占据核心地位,后者在科学上是不合理的。因此,将其放在信息和电信网络 "因特网 "上的联邦授权执行机构的官方网站上,与俄罗 斯联邦在狩猎和保护狩猎资源领域的现行法律相抵触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信