Never waste a crisis: initiatives responding to men who use violence during COVID-19

IF 1.7 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Cathy Humphreys, Helen Richardson-Foster, Michele Robinson, Jennifer Sijnja, Gemma McKibbin, Nicky Stanley
{"title":"Never waste a crisis: initiatives responding to men who use violence during COVID-19","authors":"Cathy Humphreys, Helen Richardson-Foster, Michele Robinson, Jennifer Sijnja, Gemma McKibbin, Nicky Stanley","doi":"10.1332/23986808y2023d000000006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A crisis creates a time when normal problem-solving mechanisms are thrown into disarray. The COVID-19 pandemic plunged individuals and service systems into crisis. While recognising the destructive impact on health and well-being for those involved, the aim of this study was to explore opportunities for change created during a crisis, addressing the question: What has been learnt under COVID-19 about delivering domestic abuse services to perpetrators in the UK and Australia? Documentary analysis (31 documents reviewed in Australia, and 180 searched and analysed in the UK) and interviews (24 interviews with practitioners and policy and practice leads in the UK, and 11 interviews, and one focus group in Australia) were used to explore innovations in responses to perpetrators. Two key shifts in the delivery of services to men who use violence were identified: the pivot to remote delivery; and the emergence of interventions to provide accommodation and support for perpetrators. The study demonstrated that the policy window could open at a time of crisis to support innovative developments. Early evaluations highlighted positive developments. However, further research is needed to understand more fully the implications for safety and accountability.","PeriodicalId":42166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gender-Based Violence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gender-Based Violence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/23986808y2023d000000006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A crisis creates a time when normal problem-solving mechanisms are thrown into disarray. The COVID-19 pandemic plunged individuals and service systems into crisis. While recognising the destructive impact on health and well-being for those involved, the aim of this study was to explore opportunities for change created during a crisis, addressing the question: What has been learnt under COVID-19 about delivering domestic abuse services to perpetrators in the UK and Australia? Documentary analysis (31 documents reviewed in Australia, and 180 searched and analysed in the UK) and interviews (24 interviews with practitioners and policy and practice leads in the UK, and 11 interviews, and one focus group in Australia) were used to explore innovations in responses to perpetrators. Two key shifts in the delivery of services to men who use violence were identified: the pivot to remote delivery; and the emergence of interventions to provide accommodation and support for perpetrators. The study demonstrated that the policy window could open at a time of crisis to support innovative developments. Early evaluations highlighted positive developments. However, further research is needed to understand more fully the implications for safety and accountability.
绝不浪费危机:应对 COVID-19 期间使用暴力的男性的倡议
危机使正常的问题解决机制陷入混乱。COVID-19 大流行使个人和服务系统陷入危机。在认识到危机对相关人员的健康和福祉造成破坏性影响的同时,本研究旨在探讨危机期间产生的变革机会,从而解决以下问题:在 COVID-19 框架下,英国和澳大利亚在向施暴者提供家庭虐待服务方面学到了什么?本研究通过文献分析(在澳大利亚审查了 31 份文件,在英国搜索并分析了 180 份文件)和访谈(在英国与从业人员、政策和实践负责人进行了 24 次访谈,在澳大利亚进行了 11 次访谈和 1 次焦点小组访谈)来探索应对施暴者的创新方法。研究确定了为男性施暴者提供服务的两个关键转变:转向远程提供服务;出现了为施暴者提供住宿和支持的干预措施。研究表明,政策窗口可以在危机时刻打开,以支持创新发展。早期评估强调了积极的发展。不过,还需要进一步研究,以更全面地了解对安全和问责制的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信