Offene, kritische und konstruktive „Nachbesprechung“

P. Stegmaier
{"title":"Offene, kritische und konstruktive „Nachbesprechung“","authors":"P. Stegmaier","doi":"10.24945/mvf.06.23.1866-0533.2558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over 600 researchers from various disciplines, including 40 from the field of health research, have co-signed a two-part open letter (1, 2) written by the recently founded ‚Pandemic Reappraisal Initiative‘ (3). This initiative is the brainchild of astrophysicist Prof Dr Bernhard Müller from Monash University (Australia), who is associated with the group of authors led by Prof Dr Matthias Schrappe (University of Cologne), which has critically examined corona management in Germany since the outbreak of the corona pandemic with eight thesis papers and four ad hoc statements (4) as well as a multi-professional commentary series (5) - all published in ‚Monitor Versorgungsforschung‘. In addition, Müller published a widely acclaimed controversial paper ‚Zur Modellierung der Coronapandemie‘ (6). While these scientific works were intended to show that scientific and diagnostic findings are indispensable in pandemics, but are not sufficient on their own to successfully overcome such a crisis, the Open Letters are now intended to support the call for a review of the corona pandemic and the establishment of a commission of enquiry on the one hand, and to facilitate the start of a necessary review process by means of a prioritisation and structuring catalogue on the other.","PeriodicalId":486737,"journal":{"name":"Monitor Versorgungsforschung","volume":"298 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monitor Versorgungsforschung","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24945/mvf.06.23.1866-0533.2558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over 600 researchers from various disciplines, including 40 from the field of health research, have co-signed a two-part open letter (1, 2) written by the recently founded ‚Pandemic Reappraisal Initiative‘ (3). This initiative is the brainchild of astrophysicist Prof Dr Bernhard Müller from Monash University (Australia), who is associated with the group of authors led by Prof Dr Matthias Schrappe (University of Cologne), which has critically examined corona management in Germany since the outbreak of the corona pandemic with eight thesis papers and four ad hoc statements (4) as well as a multi-professional commentary series (5) - all published in ‚Monitor Versorgungsforschung‘. In addition, Müller published a widely acclaimed controversial paper ‚Zur Modellierung der Coronapandemie‘ (6). While these scientific works were intended to show that scientific and diagnostic findings are indispensable in pandemics, but are not sufficient on their own to successfully overcome such a crisis, the Open Letters are now intended to support the call for a review of the corona pandemic and the establishment of a commission of enquiry on the one hand, and to facilitate the start of a necessary review process by means of a prioritisation and structuring catalogue on the other.
公开、批评性和建设性的 "汇报"
最近成立的 "大流行病再评估倡议"(Pandemic Reappraisal Initiative)(3)撰写了一封由两部分组成的公开信(1, 2),600 多名来自不同学科的研究人员(包括 40 名健康研究领域的研究人员)共同签署了这封信。该倡议由澳大利亚莫纳什大学的天体物理学家 Bernhard Müller 博士教授发起,他与 Matthias Schrappe 博士教授(科隆大学)领导的作者小组合作,通过八篇论文和四份特别声明(4)以及多专业评论系列(5)对德国自日冕大流行爆发以来的日冕管理进行了批判性研究,所有文章均发表在《监测日冕研究》上。此外,Müller 还发表了一篇广受好评的争议性论文 "Zur Modellierung der Coronapandemie"(6)。这些科学著作旨在表明,科学和诊断结果在大流行病中是不可或缺的,但其本身并不足以成功克服这种危机,而《公开信》现在的目的一方面是支持对冠状病毒大流行进行审查和成立调查委员会的呼吁,另一方面是通过优先次序和结构化目录促进启动必要的审查进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信