Improving the equity landscape at U.S. academic institutions: 10 strategies to lead change

Claudia S P Fernandez, Monica M Taylor, Gaurav Dave, Kathleen Brandert, Suzanna Larkin, Katherine Mollenkopf, Giselle Corbie
{"title":"Improving the equity landscape at U.S. academic institutions: 10 strategies to lead change","authors":"Claudia S P Fernandez, Monica M Taylor, Gaurav Dave, Kathleen Brandert, Suzanna Larkin, Katherine Mollenkopf, Giselle Corbie","doi":"10.1177/27526461231215084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, disparities with respect to race, ethnicity, and gender are common across academic institutions, particularly those that are large and have health research-oriented missions. Disparity-affected issues include leadership roles, funding, tenure, and salary. This paper presents a review of the current literature describing those disparities, with a focus on health professions serving major universities in the United States, and proposes approaches to create greater diversity, equity, inclusion and belonging (DEIB) within them. While many organizations nationally are working to address DEIB disparities, academic institutions can benefit from implementing structured approaches and training to nurture their cultures, foster DEIB, and promote psychological safety. We present a literature-based 10-component approach institutions can adopt with relative ease and thus positively support advancing their DEIB engagement. These 10 strategies include the following: Clearly stating DEI values; Conducting gap analyses to identify issues; Using incentives to propel change; Removing bias from recruiting processes; Implementing blind applications processes; Diversifying selection committees; Creating inter-institutional partnerships that truly represent shared power; Developing people and the pipeline; Formalizing mentorship and sponsorship programs; and instituting anti-bias training. Easily implementable strategies can both foster change and build the will and confidence to pursue larger DEIB goals in the future.","PeriodicalId":183631,"journal":{"name":"Equity in Education & Society","volume":"12 4‐5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equity in Education & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27526461231215084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the United States, disparities with respect to race, ethnicity, and gender are common across academic institutions, particularly those that are large and have health research-oriented missions. Disparity-affected issues include leadership roles, funding, tenure, and salary. This paper presents a review of the current literature describing those disparities, with a focus on health professions serving major universities in the United States, and proposes approaches to create greater diversity, equity, inclusion and belonging (DEIB) within them. While many organizations nationally are working to address DEIB disparities, academic institutions can benefit from implementing structured approaches and training to nurture their cultures, foster DEIB, and promote psychological safety. We present a literature-based 10-component approach institutions can adopt with relative ease and thus positively support advancing their DEIB engagement. These 10 strategies include the following: Clearly stating DEI values; Conducting gap analyses to identify issues; Using incentives to propel change; Removing bias from recruiting processes; Implementing blind applications processes; Diversifying selection committees; Creating inter-institutional partnerships that truly represent shared power; Developing people and the pipeline; Formalizing mentorship and sponsorship programs; and instituting anti-bias training. Easily implementable strategies can both foster change and build the will and confidence to pursue larger DEIB goals in the future.
改善美国学术机构的公平状况:引领变革的 10 项战略
在美国,种族、民族和性别方面的差异在学术机构中很常见,尤其是那些规模较大、以健康研究为导向的学术机构。受差异影响的问题包括领导角色、资金、终身职位和薪酬。本文回顾了当前描述这些差异的文献,重点关注为美国主要大学服务的卫生专业,并提出了在这些大学中创造更大的多样性、公平性、包容性和归属感(DEIB)的方法。虽然全国有很多机构都在努力解决 "多样性、平等、包容和归属 "差异问题,但学术机构也可以从实施结构化方法和培训中获益,以培育其文化,促进 "多样性、平等、包容和归属",并促进心理安全。我们介绍了一种基于文献的由 10 个部分组成的方法,各机构可以相对轻松地采用这种方法,从而积极支持推进他们的 DEIB 参与。这 10 项策略包括以下内容:明确阐明 DEI 价值观;进行差距分析以发现问题;利用激励机制推动变革;消除招聘过程中的偏见;实施盲申请程序;使遴选委员会多样化;建立真正代表共享权力的机构间合作伙伴关系;培养人才和输送管道;将导师和赞助计划正规化;以及开展反偏见培训。这些易于实施的战略既能促进变革,又能为未来实现更大的 DEIB 目标建立意愿和信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信