Satisfaction with nursing care of hospitalized patients: A descriptive, cross-sectional, multicenter study

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ilona Plevová, Miroslava Kachlová, Darja Jarošová, R. Zeleníková, Eva Mynaříková
{"title":"Satisfaction with nursing care of hospitalized patients: A descriptive, cross-sectional, multicenter study","authors":"Ilona Plevová, Miroslava Kachlová, Darja Jarošová, R. Zeleníková, Eva Mynaříková","doi":"10.13075/mp.5893.01364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In the assessment of healthcare processes focusing on the quality of care provided, patient satisfaction is an important indicator that healthcare providers may use for future setting of healthcare and preventing adverse events. The study aimed to determine satisfaction with nursing care among hospital inpatients. Material and Methods: The sample comprised 14 023 patients staying in medical and surgical wards of 14 acute care hospitals in the Czech Republic in 2019–2020. Data were collected using the Patient Satisfaction Scale , a standardized tool containing 11 items in 3 subscales. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and correlation analysis (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient). Results: Overall, patients reported high satisfaction with nursing care (M = 3.57). Patients were most satisfied with how their technical/rational needs were met (M = 3.57); the least satisfaction was identified in the domain of information needs (M = 3.53). Patients who perceived their health as good (47%) or very good (18%) showed high satisfaction scores (M = 3.77 and M = 3.73, respectively). High scores were also achieved for patients with secondary (M = 3.58) and tertiary (M = 3.59) education, those whose admission was planned (M = 3.59) and those staying in large hospitals (M = 3.60). There were no differences in satisfaction with regard to gender (p = 0.755) and the COVID-19 pandemic (p = 0.190). Conclusions: Patients’ satisfaction with care provided is a highly significant parameter of healthcare quality. It is influenced by a number of aspects which, if adequately defined, may aid in improving the quality of care. Med Pr Work Health Saf. 2023;74(6)","PeriodicalId":18749,"journal":{"name":"Medycyna pracy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medycyna pracy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13075/mp.5893.01364","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the assessment of healthcare processes focusing on the quality of care provided, patient satisfaction is an important indicator that healthcare providers may use for future setting of healthcare and preventing adverse events. The study aimed to determine satisfaction with nursing care among hospital inpatients. Material and Methods: The sample comprised 14 023 patients staying in medical and surgical wards of 14 acute care hospitals in the Czech Republic in 2019–2020. Data were collected using the Patient Satisfaction Scale , a standardized tool containing 11 items in 3 subscales. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and correlation analysis (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient). Results: Overall, patients reported high satisfaction with nursing care (M = 3.57). Patients were most satisfied with how their technical/rational needs were met (M = 3.57); the least satisfaction was identified in the domain of information needs (M = 3.53). Patients who perceived their health as good (47%) or very good (18%) showed high satisfaction scores (M = 3.77 and M = 3.73, respectively). High scores were also achieved for patients with secondary (M = 3.58) and tertiary (M = 3.59) education, those whose admission was planned (M = 3.59) and those staying in large hospitals (M = 3.60). There were no differences in satisfaction with regard to gender (p = 0.755) and the COVID-19 pandemic (p = 0.190). Conclusions: Patients’ satisfaction with care provided is a highly significant parameter of healthcare quality. It is influenced by a number of aspects which, if adequately defined, may aid in improving the quality of care. Med Pr Work Health Saf. 2023;74(6)
住院病人对护理服务的满意度:一项描述性横断面多中心研究
背景:在以护理质量为重点的医疗流程评估中,患者满意度是一项重要指标,医疗服务提供者可将其用于今后的医疗服务设置和预防不良事件的发生。本研究旨在确定医院住院患者对护理服务的满意度。材料与方法:样本包括 2019-2020 年在捷克共和国 14 家急诊医院内科和外科病房住院的 14 023 名患者。使用患者满意度量表收集数据,该量表是一种标准化工具,包含 3 个分量表中的 11 个项目。数据分析包括描述性统计和相关分析(斯皮尔曼等级相关系数)。结果总体而言,患者对护理服务的满意度较高(M = 3.57)。患者对技术/理性需求得到满足的满意度最高(M=3.57);对信息需求领域的满意度最低(M=3.53)。认为自己健康状况良好(47%)或很好(18%)的患者满意度较高(M = 3.77 和 M = 3.73)。受过中等教育(M=3.58)和高等教育(M=3.59)、按计划入院(M=3.59)和住在大医院(M=3.60)的患者满意度也很高。在性别(P = 0.755)和 COVID-19 大流行(P = 0.190)方面,满意度没有差异。结论:患者对医疗服务的满意度是医疗质量的一个非常重要的参数。它受到多个方面的影响,如果对这些方面进行适当定义,将有助于提高医疗质量。Med Pr Work Health Saf.2023;74(6)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medycyna pracy
Medycyna pracy PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original papers, review papers and case studies in Polish and English. The subject matter of the articles includes occupational pathology, physical, chemical and biological agents at workplace, toxicology, mutagenesis, health policy, health management, health care, epidemiology, etc. The magazine also includes reports from national and international scientific conferences on occupational medicine. It also contains letters to the editor. Each first-in-year issue of the magazine comprises former-year indices of authors and keywords.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信