Gap Analysis of Providing Primary Health Care in Comprehensive Rural Health Centers of Iran

IF 0.6 Q4 Health Professions
Fereshteh Fani, Ghahraman Mahmoudi, Mohammad-Ali Jahani, J. Yazdani-charati
{"title":"Gap Analysis of Providing Primary Health Care in Comprehensive Rural Health Centers of Iran","authors":"Fereshteh Fani, Ghahraman Mahmoudi, Mohammad-Ali Jahani, J. Yazdani-charati","doi":"10.24083/apjhm.v18i3.2545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The lack of primary health care (PHC) assessment will lead to the lack of knowledge of the final client's needs and to deviation from the mission of the health system. This study was conducted to compare the understanding and experience of PHC providers and recipients regarding the principles of PHC in Iran. \nMethods: This cross-sectional descriptive-analytical study was conducted on Comprehensive Rural Health Centers (CRHCs) in 2022. The research population consisted of health service providers and recipients in rural areas. A Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT) was used. 410 child/ adolescent and 402 adult PCAT were completed by stratified cluster sampling method and 413 service providers were randomly selected. This questionnaire had 6 core domains and 3 ancillary domains. After collection and entering the Excel; data were analyzed by inferential statistics tests including Independent T-test and one-way ANOVA, by SPSS26 and STATA16 at the significant level of P>0.05. \nResults: Except for the Cultural Competence and Services Available domains, in the rest of the domains, there was not the same understanding between the service provider and recipient regarding PHC services. Also. child/adolescent PHC recipients had the same understanding as adult PHC recipients in the domains of Cultural Competence, Family Centeredness, Information System, Ongoing Care, and Access. But a significant difference was between the two groups in other domains, Primary Care Score, and Primary Care Expanded scores (P >0.05). \nConclusions: For the common understanding between all three compared groups, cultural competence was the strongest component, and coordination-referral system, services provided, and community orientation were the weakest components. To fill this gap, increasing the health literacy of service recipients, real needs assessment, and providing services based on the needs of the community, reforming the processes of the referral system, and the commitment of the government to implement the processes seem necessary.","PeriodicalId":42935,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management","volume":"357 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24083/apjhm.v18i3.2545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The lack of primary health care (PHC) assessment will lead to the lack of knowledge of the final client's needs and to deviation from the mission of the health system. This study was conducted to compare the understanding and experience of PHC providers and recipients regarding the principles of PHC in Iran. Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive-analytical study was conducted on Comprehensive Rural Health Centers (CRHCs) in 2022. The research population consisted of health service providers and recipients in rural areas. A Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT) was used. 410 child/ adolescent and 402 adult PCAT were completed by stratified cluster sampling method and 413 service providers were randomly selected. This questionnaire had 6 core domains and 3 ancillary domains. After collection and entering the Excel; data were analyzed by inferential statistics tests including Independent T-test and one-way ANOVA, by SPSS26 and STATA16 at the significant level of P>0.05. Results: Except for the Cultural Competence and Services Available domains, in the rest of the domains, there was not the same understanding between the service provider and recipient regarding PHC services. Also. child/adolescent PHC recipients had the same understanding as adult PHC recipients in the domains of Cultural Competence, Family Centeredness, Information System, Ongoing Care, and Access. But a significant difference was between the two groups in other domains, Primary Care Score, and Primary Care Expanded scores (P >0.05). Conclusions: For the common understanding between all three compared groups, cultural competence was the strongest component, and coordination-referral system, services provided, and community orientation were the weakest components. To fill this gap, increasing the health literacy of service recipients, real needs assessment, and providing services based on the needs of the community, reforming the processes of the referral system, and the commitment of the government to implement the processes seem necessary.
伊朗综合农村医疗中心提供初级医疗服务的差距分析
背景:缺乏初级卫生保健(PHC)评估将导致对最终客户的需求缺乏了解,并偏离卫生系统的使命。本研究旨在比较伊朗初级卫生保健提供者和接受者对初级卫生保健原则的理解和经验。研究方法:这项横断面描述性分析研究针对 2022 年的农村综合保健中心 (CRHC) 进行。研究对象包括农村地区的医疗服务提供者和接受者。研究使用了初级保健评估工具(PCAT)。通过分层群组抽样方法,完成了 410 份儿童/青少年和 402 份成人 PCAT,并随机抽取了 413 名服务提供者。该问卷有 6 个核心领域和 3 个辅助领域。数据收集和录入 Excel 后,在 P>0.05 的显著水平下,使用 SPSS26 和 STATA16 进行推断统计检验,包括独立 T 检验和单向方差分析。结果除 "文化能力 "和 "可提供的服务 "两个领域外,在其他领域中,服务提供者和接受者对初级保健服务的理解不尽相同。此外,儿童/青少年初级保健服务接受者与成人初级保健服务接受者在文化胜任能力、以家庭为中心、信息系统、持续护理和获得服务方面的理解相同。但在其他领域、初级保健得分和初级保健扩展得分方面,两组之间存在明显差异(P>0.05)。结论:在所有三个比较组的共识中,文化能力是最强的组成部分,而协调-转诊系统、提供的服务和社区导向则是最弱的组成部分。要弥补这一差距,似乎有必要提高服务对象的健康素养、进行真正的需求评估、根据社区需求提供服务、改革转诊系统的流程以及政府承诺实施这些流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management
Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
51
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信