Carbon Farming: How to Support Farmers in Choosing the Best Management Strategies for Low-Impact Food Production

IF 3.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Land Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI:10.3390/land13010005
L. Piscitelli, Annalisa De Boni, R. Roma, Giovanni Ottomano Palmisano
{"title":"Carbon Farming: How to Support Farmers in Choosing the Best Management Strategies for Low-Impact Food Production","authors":"L. Piscitelli, Annalisa De Boni, R. Roma, Giovanni Ottomano Palmisano","doi":"10.3390/land13010005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Commission is directing efforts into triggering the storage of carbon in agricultural soils by encouraging the adoption of carbon farming practices under the European Green Deal and in other key EU policies. However, farmers that want to enter this production model urgently need to define the sustainable practices required for increasing soil organic carbon without overturning production systems and also need to adapt it for optimizing yields and improving carbon stocks. However, there is still a lack of tools that are easy to use and interpret for guiding farmers and stakeholders to find ways in which to increase soil organic carbon content. Therefore, this research aims to set up a novel bottom–up approach, in terms of the methodology and analysis process, for identifying tailored sustainable farming management strategies for the purpose of increasing soil carbon. We investigated 115 real food production cases that were carried out under homogeneous pedo-climatic conditions over a period of 20 years in the Apulia region (Southern Italy), which made it possible to create a dataset of 12 variables that were analyzed through a decision tree (created with the C4.5 algorithm). The overall results highlight that the treatment duration was the most crucial factor and affected the carbon stock both positively and negatively. This was followed by the use of cover crops alone and then those in combination with a type of irrigation system; hence, specific agricultural management strategies were successfully identified for obtaining effective carbon storage in the considered real food production cases. From a wider perspective, this research can serve as guidance to help EU private actors and public authorities to start carbon farming initiatives, pilot projects, or certification schemes at the local and/or regional levels.","PeriodicalId":37702,"journal":{"name":"Land","volume":" 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/land13010005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The European Commission is directing efforts into triggering the storage of carbon in agricultural soils by encouraging the adoption of carbon farming practices under the European Green Deal and in other key EU policies. However, farmers that want to enter this production model urgently need to define the sustainable practices required for increasing soil organic carbon without overturning production systems and also need to adapt it for optimizing yields and improving carbon stocks. However, there is still a lack of tools that are easy to use and interpret for guiding farmers and stakeholders to find ways in which to increase soil organic carbon content. Therefore, this research aims to set up a novel bottom–up approach, in terms of the methodology and analysis process, for identifying tailored sustainable farming management strategies for the purpose of increasing soil carbon. We investigated 115 real food production cases that were carried out under homogeneous pedo-climatic conditions over a period of 20 years in the Apulia region (Southern Italy), which made it possible to create a dataset of 12 variables that were analyzed through a decision tree (created with the C4.5 algorithm). The overall results highlight that the treatment duration was the most crucial factor and affected the carbon stock both positively and negatively. This was followed by the use of cover crops alone and then those in combination with a type of irrigation system; hence, specific agricultural management strategies were successfully identified for obtaining effective carbon storage in the considered real food production cases. From a wider perspective, this research can serve as guidance to help EU private actors and public authorities to start carbon farming initiatives, pilot projects, or certification schemes at the local and/or regional levels.
碳农业:如何支持农民为低影响粮食生产选择最佳管理策略
欧盟委员会正在通过鼓励在欧洲绿色交易和欧盟其他重要政策中采用碳农业实践,努力引发农业土壤中的碳储存。然而,希望采用这种生产模式的农民迫切需要确定在不颠覆生产系统的情况下增加土壤有机碳所需的可持续做法,还需要对其进行调整,以优化产量和提高碳储量。然而,目前仍缺乏易于使用和解释的工具来指导农民和利益相关者找到增加土壤有机碳含量的方法。因此,本研究旨在从方法论和分析过程两方面建立一种新颖的自下而上的方法,以确定量身定制的可持续农业管理策略,达到增加土壤碳含量的目的。我们调查了 115 个真实的粮食生产案例,这些案例是在阿普利亚地区(意大利南部)20 年的同质气候条件下进行的,因此可以创建一个包含 12 个变量的数据集,并通过决策树(使用 C4.5 算法创建)进行分析。总体结果表明,处理持续时间是最关键的因素,对碳储量既有正面影响,也有负面影响。其次是单独使用覆盖作物,然后是覆盖作物与灌溉系统的结合;因此,在所考虑的实际粮食生产案例中,成功确定了获得有效碳储存的具体农业管理策略。从更广阔的角度来看,这项研究可作为指导,帮助欧盟私营企业和公共机构在地方和/或区域层面启动碳农业倡议、试点项目或认证计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land
Land ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
23.10%
发文量
1927
期刊介绍: Land is an international and cross-disciplinary, peer-reviewed, open access journal of land system science, landscape, soil–sediment–water systems, urban study, land–climate interactions, water–energy–land–food (WELF) nexus, biodiversity research and health nexus, land modelling and data processing, ecosystem services, and multifunctionality and sustainability etc., published monthly online by MDPI. The International Association for Landscape Ecology (IALE), European Land-use Institute (ELI), and Landscape Institute (LI) are affiliated with Land, and their members receive a discount on the article processing charge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信