Research data sharing: Practices and perceptions of researchers at the selected universities in Tanzania

IF 2 4区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
O. S. Buhomoli, Paul S. Muneja
{"title":"Research data sharing: Practices and perceptions of researchers at the selected universities in Tanzania","authors":"O. S. Buhomoli, Paul S. Muneja","doi":"10.1177/02666669231219796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the presence of multiple platforms for research data sharing such as data repositories, journal systems, social media, and portable devices, the practice of data sharing has not well been deployed in many universities in Africa including Tanzania. Therefore, this study investigated research data sharing at the selected universities in Tanzania. Specifically, the study sought to explore the research data sharing practices as well as determine the researchers’ perceptions of research data sharing. This study used a cross-section survey design, where both qualitative and quantitative research approaches were used. A sample size of 200 was drawn from a population of 1846 of the universities under study. Self-administered questionnaires were used to collect data from researchers while interviews were used to collect data from the university leaders. The findings indicate that researchers were practicing research data sharing in the surveyed institutions at different levels. The study has also revealed that researchers were mostly practicing sharing of research data within their research groups. Further, it was found that most of the respondents were willing to use others’ research data compared to their data sets being used by others. Moreover, the academic backgrounds of the researchers were significantly important in research data-sharing practices. The study also found that researchers perceived that sharing of research data could easily be done if researchers would benefit from sharing the research data or if researchers would be forced to share their research data. The study concludes that, researchers at the surveyed institutions have been practicing research data sharing although at the minimum level. The study recommends the establishment of research data-sharing national framework that can guide all entities and activities related to research data sharing.","PeriodicalId":47137,"journal":{"name":"Information Development","volume":"31 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Development","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669231219796","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the presence of multiple platforms for research data sharing such as data repositories, journal systems, social media, and portable devices, the practice of data sharing has not well been deployed in many universities in Africa including Tanzania. Therefore, this study investigated research data sharing at the selected universities in Tanzania. Specifically, the study sought to explore the research data sharing practices as well as determine the researchers’ perceptions of research data sharing. This study used a cross-section survey design, where both qualitative and quantitative research approaches were used. A sample size of 200 was drawn from a population of 1846 of the universities under study. Self-administered questionnaires were used to collect data from researchers while interviews were used to collect data from the university leaders. The findings indicate that researchers were practicing research data sharing in the surveyed institutions at different levels. The study has also revealed that researchers were mostly practicing sharing of research data within their research groups. Further, it was found that most of the respondents were willing to use others’ research data compared to their data sets being used by others. Moreover, the academic backgrounds of the researchers were significantly important in research data-sharing practices. The study also found that researchers perceived that sharing of research data could easily be done if researchers would benefit from sharing the research data or if researchers would be forced to share their research data. The study concludes that, researchers at the surveyed institutions have been practicing research data sharing although at the minimum level. The study recommends the establishment of research data-sharing national framework that can guide all entities and activities related to research data sharing.
研究数据共享:坦桑尼亚选定大学研究人员的做法和看法
尽管存在多种研究数据共享平台,如数据存储库、期刊系统、社交媒体和便携式设备,但在包括坦桑尼亚在内的许多非洲大学中,数据共享的实践还没有得到很好的应用。因此,本研究调查了坦桑尼亚所选大学的研究数据共享情况。具体而言,本研究试图探索研究数据共享的实践,并确定研究人员对研究数据共享的看法。本研究采用横断面调查设计,同时使用定性和定量研究方法。从被调查大学的 1846 个人口中抽取了 200 个样本。自填式问卷用于收集研究人员的数据,而访谈则用于收集大学领导的数据。研究结果表明,在接受调查的院校中,研究人员在不同层面上都实行了研究数据共享。研究还显示,研究人员大多在其研究小组内实行研究数据共享。此外,研究还发现,与自己的数据集被他人使用相比,大多数受访者愿意使用他人的研究数据。此外,研究人员的学术背景在研究数据共享实践中也非常重要。研究还发现,研究人员认为,如果研究人员能从共享研究数据中受益,或者如果研究人员被迫共享自己的研究数据,那么共享研究数据就很容易实现。研究得出的结论是,受调查机构的研究人员一直在进行研究数据共享,尽管只是最低水平的共享。研究建议建立研究数据共享国家框架,以指导与研究数据共享有关的所有实体和活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information Development
Information Development INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Information Development is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to provide authoritative coverage of current developments in the provision, management and use of information throughout the world, with particular emphasis on the information needs and problems of developing countries. It deals with both the development of information systems, services and skills, and the role of information in personal and national development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信