Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Vancouver B1 and B2 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: A Proportional Meta-Analysis.

Hip & pelvis Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-04 DOI:10.5371/hp.2023.35.4.217
Byung-Ho Yoon, Seong Gyun Park, Young Hak Roh
{"title":"Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Vancouver B1 and B2 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: A Proportional Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Byung-Ho Yoon, Seong Gyun Park, Young Hak Roh","doi":"10.5371/hp.2023.35.4.217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) is a common complication after total hip arthroplasty, and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is a common surgical treatment. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of ORIF in patients with different fracture patterns (Vancouver B1 and B2).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and KoreaMed from inception to August 2022. We conducted a pair-wise meta-analysis (with a fixed-effects model) on the 10 comparative studies and a proportional meta-analysis on the data from the 39 articles to determine a consensus. The outcomes were the incidence of reoperations that included osteosynthesis, irrigation/debridement and revision arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pair-wise meta-analysis showed similar outcomes between two groups; the risk of reoperation (odds ratio [OR]=0.82, confidence interval [CI] 0.43-1.55, <i>P</i>=0.542), nonunion (OR=0.49; CI 0.22-1.10, <i>P</i>=0.085) and deep infection (OR=1.89, CI 0.48-7.46, <i>P</i>=0.361). In proportion meta-analysis, pooled prevalence of reoperation was 9% (95% CI, 6-12) in B1 and 8% (95% CI, 2-15) in B2 (heterogeneity between two groups (Q), <i>P</i>=0.772). The pooled prevalence of nonunion was same as of 4% in B1 and B2 (Q, <i>P</i>=0.678), and deep infection was 2% (95% CI, 1-3) in B1 and 4% (95% CI, 2-7) in B2 (Q, <i>P</i>=0.130).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ORIF is a feasible treatment for B1 and B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures, with acceptable outcomes in terms of, nonunion and infection. The results of this study would help clinicians and provide baseline data for further studies validating PFF.</p>","PeriodicalId":73239,"journal":{"name":"Hip & pelvis","volume":"35 4","pages":"217-227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10728046/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hip & pelvis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2023.35.4.217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) is a common complication after total hip arthroplasty, and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is a common surgical treatment. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of ORIF in patients with different fracture patterns (Vancouver B1 and B2).

Materials and methods: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and KoreaMed from inception to August 2022. We conducted a pair-wise meta-analysis (with a fixed-effects model) on the 10 comparative studies and a proportional meta-analysis on the data from the 39 articles to determine a consensus. The outcomes were the incidence of reoperations that included osteosynthesis, irrigation/debridement and revision arthroplasty.

Results: The pair-wise meta-analysis showed similar outcomes between two groups; the risk of reoperation (odds ratio [OR]=0.82, confidence interval [CI] 0.43-1.55, P=0.542), nonunion (OR=0.49; CI 0.22-1.10, P=0.085) and deep infection (OR=1.89, CI 0.48-7.46, P=0.361). In proportion meta-analysis, pooled prevalence of reoperation was 9% (95% CI, 6-12) in B1 and 8% (95% CI, 2-15) in B2 (heterogeneity between two groups (Q), P=0.772). The pooled prevalence of nonunion was same as of 4% in B1 and B2 (Q, P=0.678), and deep infection was 2% (95% CI, 1-3) in B1 and 4% (95% CI, 2-7) in B2 (Q, P=0.130).

Conclusion: ORIF is a feasible treatment for B1 and B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures, with acceptable outcomes in terms of, nonunion and infection. The results of this study would help clinicians and provide baseline data for further studies validating PFF.

Vancouver B1 和 B2 股骨假体周围骨折的切开复位和内固定术:比例元分析。
目的:股骨假体周围骨折(PFF)是全髋关节置换术后常见的并发症,而切开复位内固定术(ORIF)是常见的手术治疗方法。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以比较不同骨折模式(温哥华B1和B2)患者的ORIF疗效:我们对 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library 和 KoreaMed 进行了系统检索,检索时间从开始到 2022 年 8 月。我们对 10 项比较研究进行了配对荟萃分析(采用固定效应模型),并对 39 篇文章的数据进行了比例荟萃分析,以达成共识。结果是再次手术的发生率,包括骨合成、冲洗/清创和翻修关节成形术:成对荟萃分析显示两组结果相似;再次手术风险(几率比[OR]=0.82,置信区间[CI]0.43-1.55,P=0.542)、不愈合(OR=0.49;CI 0.22-1.10,P=0.085)和深度感染(OR=1.89,CI 0.48-7.46,P=0.361)。在比例荟萃分析中,B1组再次手术的总发生率为9%(95% CI,6-12),B2组为8%(95% CI,2-15)(两组间存在异质性(Q),P=0.772)。B1组和B2组的非骨髁连接发生率相同,均为4%(Q,P=0.678),B1组的深部感染发生率为2%(95% CI,1-3),B2组为4%(95% CI,2-7)(Q,P=0.130):结论:ORIF 是治疗 B1 和 B2 型股骨假体周围骨折的可行方法,在非愈合和感染方面的疗效可以接受。这项研究的结果将有助于临床医生,并为进一步验证 PFF 的研究提供基线数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信