The Safety of Body Wraps on Skin-to-Skin Care in the Neonatal Population: A Pilot Study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Advances in Neonatal Care Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-21 DOI:10.1097/ANC.0000000000001133
Allison Freccero, Melissa Scala, Kelly Andrasik McLeod, Bridgette Donahue, Macey Webb, Michelle Briggs, Ivette Najm, Monica Sinha, Lauren Santagata, Alex Dahlen, Annette Nasr
{"title":"The Safety of Body Wraps on Skin-to-Skin Care in the Neonatal Population: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Allison Freccero, Melissa Scala, Kelly Andrasik McLeod, Bridgette Donahue, Macey Webb, Michelle Briggs, Ivette Najm, Monica Sinha, Lauren Santagata, Alex Dahlen, Annette Nasr","doi":"10.1097/ANC.0000000000001133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite well-established benefits of skin-to-skin care (SSC) for preterm infants and parents, standardized guidelines for implementation do not exist. Furthermore, the literature offers little evidence-based information to guide best practice.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To discover whether SSC using a body wrap to hold preterm infants would increase the duration of SSC, decrease parental stress during SSC, and minimize adverse events to ensure that body wraps are safe and feasible.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-nine dyads of parents and preterm infants younger than 34 weeks postmenstrual age were enrolled. The first 15 dyads to meet inclusion criteria were assigned to a standard of care group for SSC with no body wrap. The remaining 14 dyads were assigned to an experimental group for SSC with a body wrap. Each dyad performed 2 SSC holds. Parents completed the Parental Stressor Scale and Parent Feedback Form. Adverse events were also documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups in total SSC time ( P = .33), the number of adverse events ( P = .31 for major events; P = .38 for minor events), average parental stress ( P = .22), and parental confidence performing SSC ( P = .18).</p><p><strong>Implications for practice and research: </strong>This study found that SSC with a body wrap is safe for preterm infants in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). This is the first study to explore the use, safety, and effectiveness of body wraps during SSC with preterm infants in an NICU. Future research should be conducted with larger sample sizes to further evaluate the safety and efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48862,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Neonatal Care","volume":" ","pages":"E11-E19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Neonatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000001133","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite well-established benefits of skin-to-skin care (SSC) for preterm infants and parents, standardized guidelines for implementation do not exist. Furthermore, the literature offers little evidence-based information to guide best practice.

Purpose: To discover whether SSC using a body wrap to hold preterm infants would increase the duration of SSC, decrease parental stress during SSC, and minimize adverse events to ensure that body wraps are safe and feasible.

Methods: Twenty-nine dyads of parents and preterm infants younger than 34 weeks postmenstrual age were enrolled. The first 15 dyads to meet inclusion criteria were assigned to a standard of care group for SSC with no body wrap. The remaining 14 dyads were assigned to an experimental group for SSC with a body wrap. Each dyad performed 2 SSC holds. Parents completed the Parental Stressor Scale and Parent Feedback Form. Adverse events were also documented.

Results: No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups in total SSC time ( P = .33), the number of adverse events ( P = .31 for major events; P = .38 for minor events), average parental stress ( P = .22), and parental confidence performing SSC ( P = .18).

Implications for practice and research: This study found that SSC with a body wrap is safe for preterm infants in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). This is the first study to explore the use, safety, and effectiveness of body wraps during SSC with preterm infants in an NICU. Future research should be conducted with larger sample sizes to further evaluate the safety and efficacy.

新生儿皮肤包裹的安全性:试点研究。
背景:尽管皮肤护理(SSC)对早产儿和父母的益处已得到证实,但目前还没有标准化的实施指南。目的:研究使用裹体包裹早产儿进行皮肤护理是否会延长皮肤护理的时间、减少父母在皮肤护理过程中的压力以及减少不良事件的发生,从而确保裹体包裹的安全性和可行性:方法:29对父母和月龄小于34周的早产儿被纳入研究。符合纳入标准的前 15 对父母被分配到不进行裹体的 SSC 标准护理组。剩下的 14 对父母被分配到使用裹体材料的 SSC 实验组。每组进行 2 次 SSC 保持。家长填写家长压力量表和家长反馈表。不良事件也被记录在案:结果:两组之间在SSC总时间(P = .33)、不良事件数量(主要事件P = .31;次要事件P = .38)、父母平均压力(P = .22)和父母对进行SSC的信心(P = .18)方面没有发现明显的统计学差异:本研究发现,在新生儿重症监护室(NICU)中使用裹体进行早产儿体格检查是安全的。这是首次对新生儿重症监护室中的早产儿进行体外体温测量时裹尸布的使用、安全性和有效性进行探讨的研究。未来的研究应使用更大的样本量来进一步评估其安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Advances in Neonatal Care takes a unique and dynamic approach to the original research and clinical practice articles it publishes. Addressing the practice challenges faced every day—caring for the 40,000-plus low-birth-weight infants in Level II and Level III NICUs each year—the journal promotes evidence-based care and improved outcomes for the tiniest patients and their families. Peer-reviewed editorial includes unique and detailed visual and teaching aids, such as Family Teaching Toolbox, Research to Practice, Cultivating Clinical Expertise, and Online Features. Each issue offers Continuing Education (CE) articles in both print and online formats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信