Validity and Reliability of POM-Checker for Measuring Shoulder Range of Motion in Healthy Participants: A Pilot Single-Center Comparative Study.

IF 2.3 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS

Methods and Protocols Pub Date : 2023-11-27 DOI:10.3390/mps6060114

Hongmin Chu, Weonjin Kim, Seongsu Joo, Eunsik Park, Yeong Won Kim, Cheol-Hyun Kim, Sangkwan Lee

{"title":"Validity and Reliability of POM-Checker for Measuring Shoulder Range of Motion in Healthy Participants: A Pilot Single-Center Comparative Study.","authors":"Hongmin Chu, Weonjin Kim, Seongsu Joo, Eunsik Park, Yeong Won Kim, Cheol-Hyun Kim, Sangkwan Lee","doi":"10.3390/mps6060114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim of this study was to compare shoulder movement measurements between a Kinect-based markerless ROM assessment device (POM-Checker) and a 3D motion capture analysis system (BTS SMART DX-400).Methods: This was a single-visit clinical trial designed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the POM-Checker. The primary outcome was to assess the equivalence between two measurement devices within the same set of participants, aiming to evaluate the validity of the POM-Checker compared to the gold standard device (3D Motion Analysis System). As this was a pilot study, six participants were included.Results: The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the reproducibility of the measurements. Among the 18 movements analyzed, 16 exhibited ICC values of >0.75, indicating excellent reproducibility.Conclusion: The results showed that the POM-checker is reliable and validated to measure the range of motion of the shoulder joint.","PeriodicalId":18715,"journal":{"name":"Methods and Protocols","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10745328/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods and Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/mps6060114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to compare shoulder movement measurements between a Kinect-based markerless ROM assessment device (POM-Checker) and a 3D motion capture analysis system (BTS SMART DX-400).

Methods: This was a single-visit clinical trial designed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the POM-Checker. The primary outcome was to assess the equivalence between two measurement devices within the same set of participants, aiming to evaluate the validity of the POM-Checker compared to the gold standard device (3D Motion Analysis System). As this was a pilot study, six participants were included.

Results: The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the reproducibility of the measurements. Among the 18 movements analyzed, 16 exhibited ICC values of >0.75, indicating excellent reproducibility.

Conclusion: The results showed that the POM-checker is reliable and validated to measure the range of motion of the shoulder joint.

查看原文本刊更多论文

POM-Checker 用于测量健康参与者肩关节活动范围的有效性和可靠性：单中心试点对比研究

研究背景本研究旨在比较基于 Kinect 的无标记 ROM 评估设备（POM-Checker）和三维运动捕捉分析系统（BTS SMART DX-400）的肩关节运动测量结果：这是一项单次临床试验，旨在评估POM-Checker的有效性和可靠性。主要结果是评估在同一组参与者中两种测量设备之间的等效性，目的是评估 POM-Checker 与黄金标准设备（三维运动分析系统）相比的有效性。由于这是一项试验性研究，共有六名参与者参加：采用类内相关系数（ICC）和相应的 95% 置信区间（CI）来评估测量结果的可重复性。在分析的 18 个动作中，有 16 个动作的 ICC 值大于 0.75，表明重现性极佳：结果表明，POM-检查器在测量肩关节活动范围方面是可靠和有效的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Methods and Protocols Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous)

CiteScore

3.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

8 weeks