Temporal dynamics of green urban areas in Romania. A comparison between spatial and statistical data

IF 1.7 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Andra-Cosmina Albulescu, Daniela Larion
{"title":"Temporal dynamics of green urban areas in Romania. A comparison between spatial and statistical data","authors":"Andra-Cosmina Albulescu, Daniela Larion","doi":"10.1515/geo-2022-0574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The social function and the ecosystem services provided by green urban areas (GUAs) have long been acknowledged by both the scientific community and the public. They become even more relevant to urban sustainability and human welfare in the post-pandemic world, which still has to confront social, environmental, and energy-related issues. This study aims to provide an example of how to perform a temporal dynamics-focused analysis of GUAs in an unsatisfactory data context by comparing the results obtained via spatial and statistical datasets of 35 cities in Romania considering the 2006–2018 period as a reference. This integration represents a compromise solution that should offer insights into the GUA’s dynamics in difficult monitoring conditions determined by the absence of both high-resolution spatial datasets and metadata-enhanced statistical datasets. Specific patterns of the GUA’s dynamics are identified, and the differences between the spatial data and statistical data-based findings are discussed. For at least 78% of the analysed cities, the official statistical data show that the GUAs are larger than the ones computed via GIS, in all reference periods. The findings call for the improvement of the GUA quantification and mapping regulations and programmes, which target, among other elements, their transparency and validation.","PeriodicalId":48712,"journal":{"name":"Open Geosciences","volume":"249 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2022-0574","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The social function and the ecosystem services provided by green urban areas (GUAs) have long been acknowledged by both the scientific community and the public. They become even more relevant to urban sustainability and human welfare in the post-pandemic world, which still has to confront social, environmental, and energy-related issues. This study aims to provide an example of how to perform a temporal dynamics-focused analysis of GUAs in an unsatisfactory data context by comparing the results obtained via spatial and statistical datasets of 35 cities in Romania considering the 2006–2018 period as a reference. This integration represents a compromise solution that should offer insights into the GUA’s dynamics in difficult monitoring conditions determined by the absence of both high-resolution spatial datasets and metadata-enhanced statistical datasets. Specific patterns of the GUA’s dynamics are identified, and the differences between the spatial data and statistical data-based findings are discussed. For at least 78% of the analysed cities, the official statistical data show that the GUAs are larger than the ones computed via GIS, in all reference periods. The findings call for the improvement of the GUA quantification and mapping regulations and programmes, which target, among other elements, their transparency and validation.
罗马尼亚城市绿地的时间动态。空间数据与统计数据的比较
城市绿地(GUA)提供的社会功能和生态系统服务早已得到科学界和公众的认可。在仍需面对社会、环境和能源相关问题的后流行世界,它们与城市可持续性和人类福祉的关系更加密切。本研究旨在提供一个实例,说明如何在数据不理想的情况下对 GUAs 进行以时间动态为重点的分析,方法是以 2006-2018 年期间为参考,比较通过罗马尼亚 35 个城市的空间和统计数据集获得的结果。由于缺乏高分辨率空间数据集和元数据增强型统计数据集,这种整合代表了一种折中的解决方案,应能深入了解 GUA 在困难的监测条件下的动态变化。我们确定了 GUA 动态的具体模式,并讨论了基于空间数据和统计数据的研究结果之间的差异。对于至少 78% 的受分析城市而言,官方统计数据显示,在所有参照期内,GUA 都大于通过 GIS 计算得出的数据。研究结果要求改进 GUA 量化和制图条例和方案,其目标包括透明度和验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Geosciences
Open Geosciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Geosciences (formerly Central European Journal of Geosciences - CEJG) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research results from all fields of Earth Sciences such as: Atmospheric Sciences, Geology, Geophysics, Geography, Oceanography and Hydrology, Glaciology, Speleology, Volcanology, Soil Science, Palaeoecology, Geotourism, Geoinformatics, Geostatistics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信