Long-term Evaluation of Dentin Bonding Properties of the Photoinitiator System Contained in Universal Adhesives Used in Fiber-Post Luting Procedures.

Pedro Henrique de Aguiar Moreira, Patrick Pereira Garcia, Myrella do Nascimento Correia, Narla Dos Reis Bacelar Chaves, Camilo Pulido, Michel Wendlinger Cantanhede Ferreira, Alessandra Reis, Fabiana Suelen Figuerêdo de Siqueira, Alessandro D Loguercio, Andres Felipe Millan Cardenas
{"title":"Long-term Evaluation of Dentin Bonding Properties of the Photoinitiator System Contained in Universal Adhesives Used in Fiber-Post Luting Procedures.","authors":"Pedro Henrique de Aguiar Moreira, Patrick Pereira Garcia, Myrella do Nascimento Correia, Narla Dos Reis Bacelar Chaves, Camilo Pulido, Michel Wendlinger Cantanhede Ferreira, Alessandra Reis, Fabiana Suelen Figuerêdo de Siqueira, Alessandro D Loguercio, Andres Felipe Millan Cardenas","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.b4786551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the long-term push-out bond strength (PBS) and nanoleakage (NL) of universal adhesives with different photo-initiator systems in the root canals of teeth in which fiber posts were luted.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One-hundred twenty endodontically treated human premolars were randomly divided into 12 groups based on the following factors: adhesives (Scotchbond Universal [SBU], Ambar Universal [AMB], and Ambar Universal APS [AMB-APS]); adhesive strategy (etch-and-rinse and self-etch), and time of testing (immediately vs after 2 years). The posts were cemented, sectioned into slices, tested for PBS at 0.5 mm/min, and examined for NL using scanning electron microscopy immediately thereafter or after 2 years of water storage. Data were evaluated using a four-way ANOVA (root thirds vs time vs universal adhesive vs adhesive strategies) and Tukey's test (α = 5%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For both evaluation times, AMB-APS demonstrated no significant difference in the PBS or NL when different radicular thirds were compared (p > 0.05). However, for SBU and AMB, the cervical third demonstrated higher PBS and lower NL than those of the apical third at both time points (p < 0.0001). AMB-APS exhibited higher PBS and lower NL in the apical third in comparison with SBU and AMB (p < 0.0001). SBU and AMB displayed a significant decrease in the PBS and increased NL after 2 years (p < 0.0001), whereas AMB-APS demonstrated no significant signs of degradation even after 2 years of water storage (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Independent of the root third evaluated, the universal adhesive containing APS photo-initiator system demonstrated bonding stability at the adhesive interface between the root canal and fiber posts, even after 2 years of water storage.</p>","PeriodicalId":94234,"journal":{"name":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b4786551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the long-term push-out bond strength (PBS) and nanoleakage (NL) of universal adhesives with different photo-initiator systems in the root canals of teeth in which fiber posts were luted.

Materials and methods: One-hundred twenty endodontically treated human premolars were randomly divided into 12 groups based on the following factors: adhesives (Scotchbond Universal [SBU], Ambar Universal [AMB], and Ambar Universal APS [AMB-APS]); adhesive strategy (etch-and-rinse and self-etch), and time of testing (immediately vs after 2 years). The posts were cemented, sectioned into slices, tested for PBS at 0.5 mm/min, and examined for NL using scanning electron microscopy immediately thereafter or after 2 years of water storage. Data were evaluated using a four-way ANOVA (root thirds vs time vs universal adhesive vs adhesive strategies) and Tukey's test (α = 5%).

Results: For both evaluation times, AMB-APS demonstrated no significant difference in the PBS or NL when different radicular thirds were compared (p > 0.05). However, for SBU and AMB, the cervical third demonstrated higher PBS and lower NL than those of the apical third at both time points (p < 0.0001). AMB-APS exhibited higher PBS and lower NL in the apical third in comparison with SBU and AMB (p < 0.0001). SBU and AMB displayed a significant decrease in the PBS and increased NL after 2 years (p < 0.0001), whereas AMB-APS demonstrated no significant signs of degradation even after 2 years of water storage (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Independent of the root third evaluated, the universal adhesive containing APS photo-initiator system demonstrated bonding stability at the adhesive interface between the root canal and fiber posts, even after 2 years of water storage.

对纤维桩接合程序中使用的通用粘合剂所含的光引发剂系统的牙本质粘合性能进行长期评估。
目的:本研究评估了使用不同光引发剂系统的通用粘合剂在装有纤维桩的牙齿根管内的长期推出粘接强度(PBS)和纳米渗漏(NL):根据粘合剂(Scotchbond Universal [SBU]、Ambar Universal [AMB]和 Ambar Universal APS [AMB-APS])、粘合剂策略(蚀刻-冲洗和自酸蚀)和测试时间(立即与 2 年后)等因素,将 120 颗经牙髓治疗的人类前臼齿随机分为 12 组。粘接后,将柱子切成薄片,以 0.5 mm/min 的速度测试 PBS,然后使用扫描电子显微镜立即或在储水 2 年后检查 NL。数据采用四元方差分析(根三等分 vs 时间 vs 通用粘合剂 vs 粘合剂策略)和 Tukey's 检验(α = 5%)进行评估:结果:在两个评估时间中,当比较不同的根三度时,AMB-APS 在 PBS 或 NL 中均无明显差异(p > 0.05)。然而,对于 SBU 和 AMB,在两个时间点,颈部三分之一的 PBS 和 NL 均高于根尖三分之一的 PBS 和 NL(P < 0.0001)。与 SBU 和 AMB 相比,AMB-APS 在顶端三分之一处显示出更高的 PBS 和更低的 NL(p < 0.0001)。2 年后,SBU 和 AMB 的 PBS 明显降低,NL 明显升高(p < 0.0001),而 AMB-APS 即使在储水 2 年后也没有明显的退化迹象(p > 0.05):结论:含有 APS 光引发剂系统的通用粘合剂在根管和纤维桩之间的粘合界面上表现出粘合稳定性,即使在储水 2 年后也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信