Application Value of Ultrasound Elastography Combined With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) Quantitative Analysis in Differentiation of Nodular Fibrocystic Changes of the Breast From Invasive Ductal Carcinoma.

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the value of ultrasound elastography combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) quantitative analysis in the differentiation of nodular fibrocystic breast change (FBC) from breast invasive ductal carcinoma (BIDC). We selected 50 patients each with nodular FBC and BIDC, who were admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University from January 2018 to December 2021. Their ultrasonic elastic images and CEUS videos were collected, their ultrasound elastography scores and the ratio of strain rate (SR) of the lesions were determined, and the exported DICOM format videos of CEUS were quantitatively analyzed using VueBox software to obtain quantitative perfusion parameters. The differences between the ultrasound elastography score and SR while comparing nodular FBC and BIDC cases were statistically significant (p < .05). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ultrasound elastography scores in the differential diagnoses of nodular FBC and BIDC were 74%, 88%, and 81%, respectively. Additionally, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of SR in the differential diagnosis of nodular FBC and BIDC were 94%, 78%, and 86%, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed in the CEUS quantitative perfusion parameters PE, AUC (WiAUC, WoAUC, WiWoAUC), and WiPI in both nodular FBC and BIDC according to the VueBox software (p < .05). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CEUS quantitative analysis in the differential diagnoses of nodular FBC and BIDC were 66%, 82%, and 74%, respectively. Using the pathological findings as the gold standard, ROC curves were established, and the area under the curve (AUC) of the CEUS quantitative analysis, elasticity score, SR, and ultrasound elastography combined with CEUS quantitative analysis were 0.731, 0.838, and 0.892, as well as 0.945, respectively. Ultrasound elasticity scoring, SR and CEUS quantitative analysis have certain application value for differentiating nodular FBC cases from BIDC; however, ultrasound elasticity imaging combined with CEUS quantitative analysis can help in improving the differential diagnostic efficacy of nodular FBC cases from BIDC.