Does topical vancomycin prevent fracture-related infections in closed fractures undergoing open reduction and internal fixation? A randomised controlled trial

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Mohit Gandhi , Gopisankar Balaji , Jagdish Menon , Ruben Raj Thomas
{"title":"Does topical vancomycin prevent fracture-related infections in closed fractures undergoing open reduction and internal fixation? A randomised controlled trial","authors":"Mohit Gandhi ,&nbsp;Gopisankar Balaji ,&nbsp;Jagdish Menon ,&nbsp;Ruben Raj Thomas","doi":"10.1016/j.cjtee.2023.11.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The role of topical vancomycin in fracture-related infection (FRI) is debatable. Very few studies have reported their efficacy in open and high-risk extremity fractures. This study aimed to assess topical vancomycin's role in reducing FRI in closed fractures undergoing open surgical intervention with an implant.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective randomized cohort study was carried out between February 2021 to January 2022. Patients with isolated closed fractures, who were planned for open reduction and internal fixation within 2 weeks from the time of injury were included for this study. The data collected included age, gender, socioeconomic status, mechanism of injury, diagnosis, Tscherne classification, and time interval to take up for surgery. Patients were randomized into the intervention and control groups using the block randomization technique. The control group received only systemic antibiotic prophylaxis, whereas the intervention group received topical application of vancomycin powder in the surgical wound alongside systemic antibiotic prophylaxis. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of FRI among these individuals. Clinical and radiological findings and culture reports (in cases with infection) were recorded during the post-operative period and at 6 weeks of follow-up. All relevant statistical calculations were done using STATA statistical/data analysis-parallel edition version 16.0 (StataCorp LLC). The quantitative variables like age and duration of the surgery were assessed for normalcy by Shapiro-Wilk W test. An independent samples <em>t</em>-test with equal variances was applied to the age data. Fisher's exact test was used for the analysis of the primary outcome measure (presence of FRI following surgery), and “Risk of FRI” and “Risk difference” between the 2 groups was calculated. The strength of the association between qualitative variables was assessed using the Fisher's exact and Chi-square tests, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 88 patients included in this study. No statistical significance was found about FRI between both groups (<em>p</em> = 0.494). At 6 weeks following surgery, no incidence of infection was observed in the intervention group. Two infections (4.5%) were found in the control group, with positive cultures reported in one of them but none in the treatment group. Radiologically, 15.9% of patients in the control group showed lysis around the implant compared to 2.3% in the intervention group. Impaired fracture healing was observed in 22.7% of patients in the intervention group compared to 15.9% in the control group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Applying topical vancomycin in closed fractures undergoing open reduction and internal fixation does not significantly reduce the incidence of FRI until the end of 6 weeks following surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51555,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Traumatology","volume":"27 2","pages":"Pages 71-76"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127523001281/pdfft?md5=5c4d0fd5c2e191fe393ca625c3dd6e06&pid=1-s2.0-S1008127523001281-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127523001281","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The role of topical vancomycin in fracture-related infection (FRI) is debatable. Very few studies have reported their efficacy in open and high-risk extremity fractures. This study aimed to assess topical vancomycin's role in reducing FRI in closed fractures undergoing open surgical intervention with an implant.

Methods

This prospective randomized cohort study was carried out between February 2021 to January 2022. Patients with isolated closed fractures, who were planned for open reduction and internal fixation within 2 weeks from the time of injury were included for this study. The data collected included age, gender, socioeconomic status, mechanism of injury, diagnosis, Tscherne classification, and time interval to take up for surgery. Patients were randomized into the intervention and control groups using the block randomization technique. The control group received only systemic antibiotic prophylaxis, whereas the intervention group received topical application of vancomycin powder in the surgical wound alongside systemic antibiotic prophylaxis. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of FRI among these individuals. Clinical and radiological findings and culture reports (in cases with infection) were recorded during the post-operative period and at 6 weeks of follow-up. All relevant statistical calculations were done using STATA statistical/data analysis-parallel edition version 16.0 (StataCorp LLC). The quantitative variables like age and duration of the surgery were assessed for normalcy by Shapiro-Wilk W test. An independent samples t-test with equal variances was applied to the age data. Fisher's exact test was used for the analysis of the primary outcome measure (presence of FRI following surgery), and “Risk of FRI” and “Risk difference” between the 2 groups was calculated. The strength of the association between qualitative variables was assessed using the Fisher's exact and Chi-square tests, respectively.

Results

There were 88 patients included in this study. No statistical significance was found about FRI between both groups (p = 0.494). At 6 weeks following surgery, no incidence of infection was observed in the intervention group. Two infections (4.5%) were found in the control group, with positive cultures reported in one of them but none in the treatment group. Radiologically, 15.9% of patients in the control group showed lysis around the implant compared to 2.3% in the intervention group. Impaired fracture healing was observed in 22.7% of patients in the intervention group compared to 15.9% in the control group.

Conclusion

Applying topical vancomycin in closed fractures undergoing open reduction and internal fixation does not significantly reduce the incidence of FRI until the end of 6 weeks following surgery.

局部使用万古霉素能否预防开放复位内固定术中闭合性骨折的骨折相关感染?随机对照试验。
目的:局部万古霉素在骨折相关感染(FRI)中的作用尚存争议。很少有研究报道其对开放性和高风险四肢骨折的疗效。本研究旨在评估外用万古霉素在通过植入物进行开放手术干预的闭合性骨折中减少 FRI 的作用:这项前瞻性随机队列研究于 2021 年 2 月至 2022 年 1 月间进行。研究对象包括计划在受伤后两周内进行切开复位和内固定术的孤立性闭合性骨折患者。收集的数据包括年龄、性别、社会经济地位、受伤机制、诊断、Tscherne分类和接受手术的时间间隔。采用分块随机技术将患者随机分为干预组和对照组。对照组只接受全身抗生素预防治疗,而干预组在接受全身抗生素预防治疗的同时,还在手术伤口处局部使用万古霉素粉。主要结果指标是这些人的 FRI 发生率。临床和放射学检查结果以及培养报告(感染病例)均在术后 6 周的随访期间记录在案。所有相关的统计计算均使用 STATA 统计/数据分析-平行版 16.0(StataCorp LLC)进行。年龄和手术持续时间等定量变量通过 Shapiro-Wilk W 检验评估其正常性。年龄数据采用等方差独立样本 t 检验。费雪精确检验用于分析主要结果指标(术后是否出现 FRI),并计算两组之间的 "FRI 风险 "和 "风险差异"。定性变量之间的关联强度分别采用费雪精确检验和卡方检验进行评估:本研究共纳入 88 名患者。两组患者的 FRI 均无统计学意义(P = 0.494)。术后 6 周,干预组未观察到感染发生。对照组发现两例感染(4.5%),其中一例培养阳性,而治疗组无一例感染。从放射学角度看,对照组有 15.9% 的患者出现植入物周围溶解,而干预组只有 2.3%。干预组 22.7% 的患者骨折愈合受损,而对照组为 15.9%:结论:在接受切开复位内固定术的闭合性骨折患者中局部使用万古霉素并不能显著降低FRI的发生率,直至术后6周。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1707
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Traumatology (CJT, ISSN 1008-1275) was launched in 1998 and is a peer-reviewed English journal authorized by Chinese Association of Trauma, Chinese Medical Association. It is multidisciplinary and designed to provide the most current and relevant information for both the clinical and basic research in the field of traumatic medicine. CJT primarily publishes expert forums, original papers, case reports and so on. Topics cover trauma system and management, surgical procedures, acute care, rehabilitation, post-traumatic complications, translational medicine, traffic medicine and other related areas. The journal especially emphasizes clinical application, technique, surgical video, guideline, recommendations for more effective surgical approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信