Lower myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality with laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with open cholecystectomy.

IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Future cardiology Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-19 DOI:10.2217/fca-2023-0102
Taft Keele, Mehrtash Hashemzadeh, Mohammad Reza Movahed
{"title":"Lower myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality with laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with open cholecystectomy.","authors":"Taft Keele, Mehrtash Hashemzadeh, Mohammad Reza Movahed","doi":"10.2217/fca-2023-0102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> We compared inpatient outcome data of open (OC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). <b>Patients & methods:</b> We used the National Inpatient Samples database from 2010-2014. <b>Results:</b> LC was done in 340,999 and OC in 68,529 OC patients. In 2010, ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) prevalence was 0.2 versus 0% (OR: 3.1, CI: 1.7-5.5; p < 0.001), non-STEMI 1 versus 0.4% (OR: 2.5 CI: 2.0-3.0; p < 0001), mortality 3.4 versus 0.4% (OR: 9.2, CI: 7.9-10.6; p < 0001). After multivariate adjustment, OC remained independently associated with STEMI, non-STEMI and all-cause inpatient mortality (mortality multivariate OR: 6.4, CI: 5.5-7.4; p < 0001, STEMI OR: 2.2. CI: 1.2-3.9; p = 0.007, non-STEMI OR: 1.5, CI: 1.3-1.9; p < 0001). <b>Conclusion:</b> OC is independently associated with STEMI, non-STEMI and all-cause inpatient mortality compared with LC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12589,"journal":{"name":"Future cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"759-765"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/fca-2023-0102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: We compared inpatient outcome data of open (OC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Patients & methods: We used the National Inpatient Samples database from 2010-2014. Results: LC was done in 340,999 and OC in 68,529 OC patients. In 2010, ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) prevalence was 0.2 versus 0% (OR: 3.1, CI: 1.7-5.5; p < 0.001), non-STEMI 1 versus 0.4% (OR: 2.5 CI: 2.0-3.0; p < 0001), mortality 3.4 versus 0.4% (OR: 9.2, CI: 7.9-10.6; p < 0001). After multivariate adjustment, OC remained independently associated with STEMI, non-STEMI and all-cause inpatient mortality (mortality multivariate OR: 6.4, CI: 5.5-7.4; p < 0001, STEMI OR: 2.2. CI: 1.2-3.9; p = 0.007, non-STEMI OR: 1.5, CI: 1.3-1.9; p < 0001). Conclusion: OC is independently associated with STEMI, non-STEMI and all-cause inpatient mortality compared with LC.

腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术相比,心肌梗死和全因死亡率更低。
目的:我们比较了开腹胆囊切除术(OC)与腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的住院结果数据。患者与方法:我们使用了 2010-2014 年的全国住院病人样本数据库。结果:340999名患者接受了腹腔镜胆囊切除术,68529名患者接受了开腹胆囊切除术。2010年,ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的发生率为0.2%对0%(OR:3.1,CI:1.7-5.5;P 结论:与低密度脂蛋白血症相比,OC 与 STEMI、非 STEMI 和全因住院患者死亡率密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Future cardiology
Future cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Research advances have contributed to improved outcomes across all specialties, but the rate of advancement in cardiology has been exceptional. Concurrently, the population of patients with cardiac conditions continues to grow and greater public awareness has increased patients" expectations of new drugs and devices. Future Cardiology (ISSN 1479-6678) reflects this new era of cardiology and highlights the new molecular approach to advancing cardiovascular therapy. Coverage will also reflect the major technological advances in bioengineering in cardiology in terms of advanced and robust devices, miniaturization, imaging, system modeling and information management issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信