New minimally invasive solutions for Benign Prostatic Obstruction (BPO) management: A position paper from the UrOP (Urologi Ospedalità Gestione Privata).

IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Rosario Leonardi, Francesca Ambrosini, Rafaela Malinaric, Angelo Cafarelli, Alessandro Calarco, Renzo Colombo, Ottavio De Cobelli, Ferdinando De Marco, Giovanni Ferrari, Giuseppe Ludovico, Stefano Pecoraro, Domenico Tuzzolo, Carlo Terrone, Guglielmo Mantica
{"title":"New minimally invasive solutions for Benign Prostatic Obstruction (BPO) management: A position paper from the UrOP (Urologi Ospedalità Gestione Privata).","authors":"Rosario Leonardi, Francesca Ambrosini, Rafaela Malinaric, Angelo Cafarelli, Alessandro Calarco, Renzo Colombo, Ottavio De Cobelli, Ferdinando De Marco, Giovanni Ferrari, Giuseppe Ludovico, Stefano Pecoraro, Domenico Tuzzolo, Carlo Terrone, Guglielmo Mantica","doi":"10.4081/aiua.2023.12003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To the Editor, In recent years, alternative solutions have been proposed to obtain effective results comparable to TURP, which is currently considered the gold standard, and laser vapo-enucleation techniques (1, 2), but with the possibility of maintaining sexual functions. In recent years there has been a growing trend towards ejaculation preservation. Although the results of TURP (3), and most laser enucleation techniques are undoubted in the Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) management, they often lack in the preservation of ejaculation. All the alternative recently proposed interventions (Rezum, AquaBeam, Urolift, TPLA, i-TIND, LEST) are procedures considered by some authors to be promising in both managing BPO and preserving sexual functions. However, all these methods are limited by a lack of long-term follow-up that would evaluate the efficacy over time, possible complications related to the method and the correct patient selection for a specific method. The aim of this letter is to summarize the available evidence and provide clinicians with practical recommendations on the use of the brand new minimally invasive techniques for the management of BPO. [...].</p>","PeriodicalId":46900,"journal":{"name":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2023.12003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To the Editor, In recent years, alternative solutions have been proposed to obtain effective results comparable to TURP, which is currently considered the gold standard, and laser vapo-enucleation techniques (1, 2), but with the possibility of maintaining sexual functions. In recent years there has been a growing trend towards ejaculation preservation. Although the results of TURP (3), and most laser enucleation techniques are undoubted in the Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) management, they often lack in the preservation of ejaculation. All the alternative recently proposed interventions (Rezum, AquaBeam, Urolift, TPLA, i-TIND, LEST) are procedures considered by some authors to be promising in both managing BPO and preserving sexual functions. However, all these methods are limited by a lack of long-term follow-up that would evaluate the efficacy over time, possible complications related to the method and the correct patient selection for a specific method. The aim of this letter is to summarize the available evidence and provide clinicians with practical recommendations on the use of the brand new minimally invasive techniques for the management of BPO. [...].

良性前列腺梗阻(BPO)治疗的新微创解决方案:UrOP(Urologi Ospedalità Gestione Privata)的立场文件。
致编辑:近年来,人们提出了一些替代方案,以获得与目前被认为是黄金标准的 TURP 和激光汽化去核技术(1, 2)相当的有效效果,同时还能保持性功能。近年来,保留射精功能的趋势越来越明显。虽然前列腺电切术(TURP)(3)和大多数激光汽化电切技术在治疗良性前列腺增生症(BPH)和下尿路症状(LUTS)方面的效果毋庸置疑,但它们在保留射精功能方面往往存在不足。一些学者认为,最近提出的所有替代干预方法(Rezum、AquaBeam、Urolift、TPLA、i-TIND、LEST)在治疗良性前列腺增生症和保持性功能方面都很有前景。然而,所有这些方法都因缺乏长期随访而受到限制,因为缺乏长期随访可以评估这些方法的疗效、可能出现的并发症以及对特定方法的正确患者选择。本信旨在总结现有证据,并为临床医生提供使用全新微创技术治疗 BPO 的实用建议。[...].
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
35.70%
发文量
72
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信