Could transperineal interstitial laser ablation of the prostate be the right option for highly-comorbid patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic obstruction? A preliminary single-center experience focusing on functional and safety outcomes.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Minerva Urology and Nephrology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-13 DOI:10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05479-4
Paolo Polverino, Mattia Lo Re, Marco Saladino, Alessio Pecoraro, Luisa Moscardi, Anna Rivetti, Giulio R Resta, Marta Pezzoli, Andrea Romano, Bhaskar K Somani, Giampaolo Siena, Andrea Cocci, Mauro Gacci, Andrea Minervini, Sergio Serni, Riccardo Campi, Francesco Sessa
{"title":"Could transperineal interstitial laser ablation of the prostate be the right option for highly-comorbid patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic obstruction? A preliminary single-center experience focusing on functional and safety outcomes.","authors":"Paolo Polverino, Mattia Lo Re, Marco Saladino, Alessio Pecoraro, Luisa Moscardi, Anna Rivetti, Giulio R Resta, Marta Pezzoli, Andrea Romano, Bhaskar K Somani, Giampaolo Siena, Andrea Cocci, Mauro Gacci, Andrea Minervini, Sergio Serni, Riccardo Campi, Francesco Sessa","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05479-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this paper, we aimed to highlight functional and safety outcomes of highly-comorbid patients undergoing transperineal laser ablation (TPLA) of prostate at a referral academic center. Patients undergoing TPLA from April 2021 and February 2023 with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), prostate volume ranging from 30 to 100 mL, and an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Score ≥3 were included. All patients were evaluated as unfit for standard surgery. Procedures were performed in an outpatient setting using local anesthesia. Failure after the procedure was defined as the shift to other ultra-minimally invasive surgical treatment or the need for long-term indwelling catheter replacement. Overall, 23 patients were enrolled with a median age of 76 years. Median ASA Score and Charlson Comorbidity Index were 3 and 5, respectively. Of these, 11 (48%) were under antiplatelets, 4 (17%) under new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and 3 (13%) under warfarin. Six (26%) patients had an indwelling catheter preoperatively. Median prostate volume was 42 mL. Median follow-up was 12 months. No Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥2 complications were recorded. Four/six (66%) patients with an indwelling catheter before TPLA achieved spontaneous micturition. Treatment failure occurred in 2 (8.5%) patients. Of the remaining 21 patients, 12/21 (57%) patients reported an improvement in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) symptoms class (i.e., severe to moderate, moderate to mild, etc.); all patients whose IPSS symptoms class remained stable (N.=8 [38%]) had a significant improvement of the IPSS score as compared to the preoperative period, while 1 (4.5%) patient reported worsening of LUTS. In conclusion, TPLA appears to be a safe and feasible ultra-minimally-invasive option for LUTS due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) in patients with significant comorbidities at high-risk for standard surgical options.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05479-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we aimed to highlight functional and safety outcomes of highly-comorbid patients undergoing transperineal laser ablation (TPLA) of prostate at a referral academic center. Patients undergoing TPLA from April 2021 and February 2023 with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), prostate volume ranging from 30 to 100 mL, and an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Score ≥3 were included. All patients were evaluated as unfit for standard surgery. Procedures were performed in an outpatient setting using local anesthesia. Failure after the procedure was defined as the shift to other ultra-minimally invasive surgical treatment or the need for long-term indwelling catheter replacement. Overall, 23 patients were enrolled with a median age of 76 years. Median ASA Score and Charlson Comorbidity Index were 3 and 5, respectively. Of these, 11 (48%) were under antiplatelets, 4 (17%) under new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and 3 (13%) under warfarin. Six (26%) patients had an indwelling catheter preoperatively. Median prostate volume was 42 mL. Median follow-up was 12 months. No Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥2 complications were recorded. Four/six (66%) patients with an indwelling catheter before TPLA achieved spontaneous micturition. Treatment failure occurred in 2 (8.5%) patients. Of the remaining 21 patients, 12/21 (57%) patients reported an improvement in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) symptoms class (i.e., severe to moderate, moderate to mild, etc.); all patients whose IPSS symptoms class remained stable (N.=8 [38%]) had a significant improvement of the IPSS score as compared to the preoperative period, while 1 (4.5%) patient reported worsening of LUTS. In conclusion, TPLA appears to be a safe and feasible ultra-minimally-invasive option for LUTS due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) in patients with significant comorbidities at high-risk for standard surgical options.

经会阴前列腺间质激光消融术能否成为因良性前列腺梗阻而出现下尿路症状的高合并症患者的正确选择?以功能性和安全性结果为重点的初步单中心经验。
本文旨在强调在一家转诊学术中心接受经会阴前列腺激光消融术(TPLA)的高合并症患者的功能和安全结果。2021年4月至2023年2月期间接受经会阴前列腺激光消融术的患者均伴有中度至重度下尿路症状(LUTS),前列腺体积在30至100毫升之间,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分≥3分。所有患者均被评估为不适合接受标准手术。手术在门诊进行,采用局部麻醉。术后失败的定义是转向其他超微创手术治疗或需要长期更换留置导管。共有 23 名患者入选,中位年龄为 76 岁。ASA评分和Charlson合并症指数中位数分别为3和5。其中,11 人(48%)服用抗血小板药物,4 人(17%)服用新型口服抗凝药(NOACs),3 人(13%)服用华法林。6名(26%)患者术前留置了导尿管。前列腺体积中位数为 42 毫升。中位随访时间为 12 个月。无克拉维恩-丁多≥2级并发症记录。4/6(66%)名在 TPLA 术前留置导尿管的患者实现了自主排尿。2例(8.5%)患者治疗失败。在剩余的 21 例患者中,12/21(57%)例患者的国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)症状分级(即重度至中度、中度至轻度等)有所改善;所有 IPSS 症状分级保持稳定的患者(8 例 [38%])的 IPSS 评分与术前相比均有显著改善,而 1 例(4.5%)患者的 LUTS 有所恶化。总之,TPLA似乎是治疗良性前列腺梗阻(BPO)引起的LUTS的一种安全可行的超微创方法,适用于有严重合并症且标准手术方案风险较高的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva Urology and Nephrology
Minerva Urology and Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
32.70%
发文量
237
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信