The Fracture Incidence and Safety of Teriparatide and Bisphosphonate in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis: A Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Qi Zhong, Yuanyue Liao, Wen Zou
{"title":"The Fracture Incidence and Safety of Teriparatide and Bisphosphonate in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Qi Zhong, Yuanyue Liao, Wen Zou","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the anti-fracture effect and adverse effects of teriparatide versus bisphosphonate on postmenopausal osteoporosis. This study will provide evidence-based practice for the clinical selection of more effective and safer drugs for these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from database inception to July 2022. The keywords included \"fracture\"; \"teriparatide\", \"bisphosphonate\", \"postmenopausal women\", and \"osteoporosis\". Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing teriparatide versus bisphosphonates on the risk of fracture and adverse effects in postmenopausal osteoporosis were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Finally, 3376 participants were recruited in all 5 RCTs. The results revealed that teriparatide could decrease the rate of clinical vertebral fracture (OR=1.97, 95% CI=1.43-2.73, I2 = 0%, P < .0001) and new vertebral fractures (OR=2.44, 95% CI=1.70-3.50, I2 = 0%, P < .00001) compared with bisphosphonate. AE results refer to the type and frequency of adverse effects related to drug treatment. The rate of treatment discontinuous due to AEs (OR=0.63, 95% CI=0.48-0.83, I2 = 44%, P = .0009) with teriparatide was significantly greater than that with bisphosphonate. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events to death (OR=0.59, 95% CI=0.30-1.18, I2 = 0%, P = .13). The proportion of patients reporting adverse events in the teriparatide versus bisphosphonate groups was consistent across subgroups, except for the rate of dizziness (OR=0.53, 95% CI=0.31-0.90, I2 = 49%, P = .02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, clinical vertebral fractures and new vertebral fractures decreased more in patients receiving teriparatide than in those receiving bisphosphonate. Although there were no differences in adverse events across subgroups, patients receiving teriparatide had a higher rate of dizziness than those receiving bisphosphonate.The results of this work will provide a reference for clinicians to select appropriate anti-osteoporosis drugs by comprehensively considering individual differences such as fracture risk and dizziness tolerance.</p>","PeriodicalId":7571,"journal":{"name":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the anti-fracture effect and adverse effects of teriparatide versus bisphosphonate on postmenopausal osteoporosis. This study will provide evidence-based practice for the clinical selection of more effective and safer drugs for these patients.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from database inception to July 2022. The keywords included "fracture"; "teriparatide", "bisphosphonate", "postmenopausal women", and "osteoporosis". Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing teriparatide versus bisphosphonates on the risk of fracture and adverse effects in postmenopausal osteoporosis were included in the analysis.

Results: Finally, 3376 participants were recruited in all 5 RCTs. The results revealed that teriparatide could decrease the rate of clinical vertebral fracture (OR=1.97, 95% CI=1.43-2.73, I2 = 0%, P < .0001) and new vertebral fractures (OR=2.44, 95% CI=1.70-3.50, I2 = 0%, P < .00001) compared with bisphosphonate. AE results refer to the type and frequency of adverse effects related to drug treatment. The rate of treatment discontinuous due to AEs (OR=0.63, 95% CI=0.48-0.83, I2 = 44%, P = .0009) with teriparatide was significantly greater than that with bisphosphonate. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events to death (OR=0.59, 95% CI=0.30-1.18, I2 = 0%, P = .13). The proportion of patients reporting adverse events in the teriparatide versus bisphosphonate groups was consistent across subgroups, except for the rate of dizziness (OR=0.53, 95% CI=0.31-0.90, I2 = 49%, P = .02).

Conclusions: Among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, clinical vertebral fractures and new vertebral fractures decreased more in patients receiving teriparatide than in those receiving bisphosphonate. Although there were no differences in adverse events across subgroups, patients receiving teriparatide had a higher rate of dizziness than those receiving bisphosphonate.The results of this work will provide a reference for clinicians to select appropriate anti-osteoporosis drugs by comprehensively considering individual differences such as fracture risk and dizziness tolerance.

特立帕肽和双膦酸盐对绝经后骨质疏松症妇女的骨折发生率和安全性:一项 Meta 分析。
目的评估特立帕肽与双膦酸盐对绝经后骨质疏松症的抗骨折效果和不良反应。这项研究将为这些患者临床选择更有效、更安全的药物提供循证实践:方法:我们检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆从数据库开始到 2022 年 7 月的数据。关键词包括 "骨折"、"特立帕肽"、"双膦酸盐"、"绝经后妇女 "和 "骨质疏松症"。在分析中纳入了比较特立帕肽与双膦酸盐对绝经后骨质疏松症患者骨折风险和不良反应的随机对照试验(RCT):最后,所有 5 项研究共招募了 3376 名参与者。结果显示,与双磷酸盐相比,特立帕肽可降低临床椎体骨折率(OR=1.97,95% CI=1.43-2.73,I2=0%,P < .0001)和新发椎体骨折率(OR=2.44,95% CI=1.70-3.50,I2=0%,P < .00001)。AE结果是指与药物治疗相关的不良反应的类型和频率。特立帕肽因不良反应而中断治疗的比例(OR=0.63,95% CI=0.48-0.83,I2=44%,P=0.0009)明显高于双膦酸盐。然而,不良事件至死亡的发生率没有明显差异(OR=0.59,95% CI=0.30-1.18,I2=0%,P=0.13)。除了头晕率(OR=0.53,95% CI=0.31-0.90,I2=49%,P=.02)外,特立帕肽组和双磷酸盐组报告不良事件的患者比例在各亚组间是一致的:结论:在绝经后骨质疏松症女性患者中,接受特立帕肽治疗的患者比接受双膦酸盐治疗的患者临床椎体骨折和新发椎体骨折减少得更多。虽然不同亚组的不良反应没有差异,但接受特立帕肽治疗的患者出现头晕的比例高于接受双磷酸盐治疗的患者。这项工作的结果将为临床医生综合考虑骨折风险和头晕耐受性等个体差异,选择合适的抗骨质疏松症药物提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alternative therapies in health and medicine
Alternative therapies in health and medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
219
期刊介绍: Launched in 1995, Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine has a mission to promote the art and science of integrative medicine and a responsibility to improve public health. We strive to maintain the highest standards of ethical medical journalism independent of special interests that is timely, accurate, and a pleasure to read. We publish original, peer-reviewed scientific articles that provide health care providers with continuing education to promote health, prevent illness, and treat disease. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine was the first journal in this field to be indexed in the National Library of Medicine. In 2006, 2007, and 2008, ATHM had the highest impact factor ranking of any independently published peer-reviewed CAM journal in the United States—meaning that its research articles were cited more frequently than any other journal’s in the field. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine does not endorse any particular system or method but promotes the evaluation and appropriate use of all effective therapeutic approaches. Each issue contains a variety of disciplined inquiry methods, from case reports to original scientific research to systematic reviews. The editors encourage the integration of evidence-based emerging therapies with conventional medical practices by licensed health care providers in a way that promotes a comprehensive approach to health care that is focused on wellness, prevention, and healing. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine hopes to inform all licensed health care practitioners about developments in fields other than their own and to foster an ongoing debate about the scientific, clinical, historical, legal, political, and cultural issues that affect all of health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信