Songwriters vs. the recording industry: the use and abuse of statistics in UK streaming debates

IF 0.7 3区 艺术学 0 MUSIC
Richard Osborne
{"title":"Songwriters vs. the recording industry: the use and abuse of statistics in UK streaming debates","authors":"Richard Osborne","doi":"10.1017/s0261143023000508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Britain, the Select Committee of the government department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport has investigated the economics of streaming and recommended that the share of revenues for record companies should decrease so that songwriters can earn more. This article addresses lobbying activity that has resulted from this recommendation. To support their causes, songwriter representatives and record company organisations have made incorrect or misleading use of data from the report <jats:italic>Music Creators’ Earnings in the Digital Age</jats:italic>. This article looks at the impact of these uses and provides corrections and alternatives to the statistics that have been employed. It also looks at the importance of the issues that have been raised. In conclusion, it addresses aspects of record company accounting that will need to be considered if an increase for songwriters is to be made at their expense.","PeriodicalId":46171,"journal":{"name":"Popular Music","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Popular Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261143023000508","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Britain, the Select Committee of the government department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport has investigated the economics of streaming and recommended that the share of revenues for record companies should decrease so that songwriters can earn more. This article addresses lobbying activity that has resulted from this recommendation. To support their causes, songwriter representatives and record company organisations have made incorrect or misleading use of data from the report Music Creators’ Earnings in the Digital Age. This article looks at the impact of these uses and provides corrections and alternatives to the statistics that have been employed. It also looks at the importance of the issues that have been raised. In conclusion, it addresses aspects of record company accounting that will need to be considered if an increase for songwriters is to be made at their expense.
词曲作者与唱片业:英国流媒体辩论中统计数据的使用与滥用
在英国,政府数字、文化、媒体和体育部特别委员会对流媒体的经济性进行了调查,并建议减少唱片公司的收入份额,以便歌曲作者能够获得更多收入。本文探讨了这一建议所引发的游说活动。为了支持自己的主张,词曲作者代表和唱片公司组织错误或误导性地使用了《数字时代音乐创作者的收入》报告中的数据。本文探讨了这些使用的影响,并对所使用的统计数据进行了更正和替代。文章还探讨了所提出问题的重要性。最后,文章论述了唱片公司会计的一些方面,如果要增加歌曲作者的收入,就必须考虑这些方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Popular Music
Popular Music MUSIC-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Popular Music is an international multi-disciplinary journal covering all aspects of the subject - from the formation of social group identities through popular music, to the workings of the global music industry, to how particular pieces of music are put together. The journal includes all kinds of popular music, whether rap or rai, jazz or rock, from any historical era and any geographical location. Popular Music carries articles by scholars from a variety of disciplines and theoretical perspectives. Each issue contains substantial, authoritative and influential articles, topical pieces, and reviews of a wide range of books.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信