Knowledge and Practice Gaps in Pediatric Neurocritical Care Nursing: Lessons Learned From a Specialized Educational Boot Camp

Nathan Chang, Amelia Sperber, May Casazza, Leslie Ciraulo, Prathyusha Teeyagura, Lindsey Rasmussen
{"title":"Knowledge and Practice Gaps in Pediatric Neurocritical Care Nursing: Lessons Learned From a Specialized Educational Boot Camp","authors":"Nathan Chang, Amelia Sperber, May Casazza, Leslie Ciraulo, Prathyusha Teeyagura, Lindsey Rasmussen","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES: Pediatric neurocritical care (PNCC) is a quickly growing subspecialty within pediatric critical care medicine. Standards for care, education, and application of neuromonitoring technologies in PNCC are still being developed. We sought to identify and improve knowledge deficits in neurocritical care with an educational boot camp for nurses. SETTING: Quaternary children’s hospital with 36 PICU beds. DESIGN: Preinterventional and postinterventional study. METHODS: A 2-day boot camp course covering neurologic and neurosurgical topics pertinent to PNCC was provided to 46 pediatric acute and critical care nurses divided into three cohorts over 3 years. Participant characteristics were collected, and precourse and postcourse knowledge assessments were administered. RESULTS: Regarding participant characteristics, neither critical care registered nurse certification nor years of nursing experience were associated with better precourse baseline knowledge. Knowledge gaps spanned bedside neurologic assessments, physiologic goals in brain injury, and side effects of neurocritical care medications. In postcourse assessments, all participants showed improvement in scores, and most participants sustained improvements after 6 months. Nurses reported significant improvement in self-reported confidence in caring for the PNCC population. We also observed shorter ICU lengths of stay, decreased hospital incident reports, and decreased time to stroke imaging, although these programmatic metrics cannot be credited to nursing education alone. CONCLUSIONS: PNCC programs should include nursing expertise in the field. However, topics specific to PNCC may not be adequately addressed by existing general critical care nursing education and certification. A multimodal educational boot camp can be an effective method to improve nursing knowledge in PNCC. Our results demonstrate that specialty nursing education in PNCC is both innovative and feasible, with the potential to improve patient care. Further research is needed to determine the benefits of specialty education on quality of care and clinical outcomes.","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric neurocritical care (PNCC) is a quickly growing subspecialty within pediatric critical care medicine. Standards for care, education, and application of neuromonitoring technologies in PNCC are still being developed. We sought to identify and improve knowledge deficits in neurocritical care with an educational boot camp for nurses. SETTING: Quaternary children’s hospital with 36 PICU beds. DESIGN: Preinterventional and postinterventional study. METHODS: A 2-day boot camp course covering neurologic and neurosurgical topics pertinent to PNCC was provided to 46 pediatric acute and critical care nurses divided into three cohorts over 3 years. Participant characteristics were collected, and precourse and postcourse knowledge assessments were administered. RESULTS: Regarding participant characteristics, neither critical care registered nurse certification nor years of nursing experience were associated with better precourse baseline knowledge. Knowledge gaps spanned bedside neurologic assessments, physiologic goals in brain injury, and side effects of neurocritical care medications. In postcourse assessments, all participants showed improvement in scores, and most participants sustained improvements after 6 months. Nurses reported significant improvement in self-reported confidence in caring for the PNCC population. We also observed shorter ICU lengths of stay, decreased hospital incident reports, and decreased time to stroke imaging, although these programmatic metrics cannot be credited to nursing education alone. CONCLUSIONS: PNCC programs should include nursing expertise in the field. However, topics specific to PNCC may not be adequately addressed by existing general critical care nursing education and certification. A multimodal educational boot camp can be an effective method to improve nursing knowledge in PNCC. Our results demonstrate that specialty nursing education in PNCC is both innovative and feasible, with the potential to improve patient care. Further research is needed to determine the benefits of specialty education on quality of care and clinical outcomes.
儿科神经重症护理的知识和实践差距:从专业教育训练营中汲取的经验教训
目的:小儿神经危重症护理(PNCC)是儿科危重症医学中一个快速发展的亚专科。PNCC的护理、教育和神经监测技术应用标准仍在制定中。我们试图通过护士教育训练营来识别和改善神经危重症护理的知识缺陷。单位:第四系儿童医院,PICU床位36张。设计:介入前和介入后研究。方法:对46名儿科急危护理护士进行为期2天的培训课程,内容涵盖与PNCC相关的神经和神经外科主题,这些护士被分成3组,时间超过3年。收集参与者的特征,并进行课前和课后知识评估。结果:关于参与者特征,重症护理注册护士证书和护理经验年数与更好的术前基线知识无关。知识差距跨越床边神经学评估,脑损伤的生理目标,以及神经危重症护理药物的副作用。在课程后评估中,所有参与者的得分都有所提高,大多数参与者在6个月后持续改善。护士报告在照顾PNCC人群方面自我报告的信心有了显著的改善。我们还观察到ICU住院时间缩短,医院事件报告减少,卒中成像时间减少,尽管这些程序性指标不能仅仅归功于护理教育。结论:PNCC项目应包括该领域的护理专业知识。然而,特定于PNCC的主题可能无法通过现有的一般重症护理教育和认证得到充分解决。多模式教育训练营是提高PNCC护理知识的有效途径。本研究结果表明,专科护理教育具有创新性和可行性,具有改善患者护理的潜力。需要进一步的研究来确定专科教育对护理质量和临床结果的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信