Combustion Optimization of a Premixed Ultra-Lean Blend of Natural Gas and Hydrogen in a Dual Fuel Engine Running at Low Load

IF 1.1 Q3 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
C. Rinaldini, F. Scrignoli, T. Savioli, E. Mattarelli
{"title":"Combustion Optimization of a Premixed Ultra-Lean Blend of Natural Gas\n and Hydrogen in a Dual Fuel Engine Running at Low Load","authors":"C. Rinaldini, F. Scrignoli, T. Savioli, E. Mattarelli","doi":"10.4271/03-17-04-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The numerical study presented in this article is based on an automotive diesel\n engine (2.8 L, 4-cylinder, turbocharged), considering a NG–H2 blend\n with 30 vol% of H2, ignited by multiple diesel fuel injections. The\n 3D-CFD investigation aims at improving BTE, CO, and UHC emissions at low load,\n by means of an optimization of the diesel fuel injection strategy and of the\n in-cylinder turbulence (swirl ratio, SR). The operating condition is 3000 rpm –\n BMEP = 2 bar, corresponding to about 25% of the maximum load of a gen-set\n engine, able to deliver up to 83 kW at 3000 rpm (rated speed). The reference\n diesel fuel injection strategy, adopted in all the previous numerical and\n experimental studies, is a three-shot mode. The numerical optimization carried\n out in this study consisted in finding the optimal number of injections per\n cycle, as well as the best timing of each injection and the fuel mass split\n among the injections. The analysis revealed that combustion can be improved by\n increasing the local concentration of the more reactive fuel (diesel): in\n detail, the best strategy is a two-shot mode, with SOI1 = −35°CA AFTDC and SOI2\n = −20°CA AFTDC, injecting 70% of the total diesel fuel mass at the first shot.\n As far as the SR is concerned, the best compromise between performance and\n emissions was found for a relatively low SR = 1.4. The optimization permitted to\n extract the full potential of the H2 enrichment in the DF\n H2/NG–diesel combustion also at low loads: in comparison to the\n DF NG case, combustion efficiency, and gross indicated thermal efficiency have\n been improved by 45.7% and 61.0%, respectively; CO- and UHC-specific emissions\n have been reduced by about 85.0%. Comparing CDC to the optimized DF 30 vol%\n H2/NG–diesel case, soot emissions are completely canceled,\n CO2-specific emissions have been reduced by approximately 42.0%,\n NOx-specific emissions by 33.8%. However, further work has to be\n done in order to reach comparable values of HC and CO, which are still higher\n than in a standard diesel combustion.","PeriodicalId":47948,"journal":{"name":"SAE International Journal of Engines","volume":" 38","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE International Journal of Engines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/03-17-04-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The numerical study presented in this article is based on an automotive diesel engine (2.8 L, 4-cylinder, turbocharged), considering a NG–H2 blend with 30 vol% of H2, ignited by multiple diesel fuel injections. The 3D-CFD investigation aims at improving BTE, CO, and UHC emissions at low load, by means of an optimization of the diesel fuel injection strategy and of the in-cylinder turbulence (swirl ratio, SR). The operating condition is 3000 rpm – BMEP = 2 bar, corresponding to about 25% of the maximum load of a gen-set engine, able to deliver up to 83 kW at 3000 rpm (rated speed). The reference diesel fuel injection strategy, adopted in all the previous numerical and experimental studies, is a three-shot mode. The numerical optimization carried out in this study consisted in finding the optimal number of injections per cycle, as well as the best timing of each injection and the fuel mass split among the injections. The analysis revealed that combustion can be improved by increasing the local concentration of the more reactive fuel (diesel): in detail, the best strategy is a two-shot mode, with SOI1 = −35°CA AFTDC and SOI2 = −20°CA AFTDC, injecting 70% of the total diesel fuel mass at the first shot. As far as the SR is concerned, the best compromise between performance and emissions was found for a relatively low SR = 1.4. The optimization permitted to extract the full potential of the H2 enrichment in the DF H2/NG–diesel combustion also at low loads: in comparison to the DF NG case, combustion efficiency, and gross indicated thermal efficiency have been improved by 45.7% and 61.0%, respectively; CO- and UHC-specific emissions have been reduced by about 85.0%. Comparing CDC to the optimized DF 30 vol% H2/NG–diesel case, soot emissions are completely canceled, CO2-specific emissions have been reduced by approximately 42.0%, NOx-specific emissions by 33.8%. However, further work has to be done in order to reach comparable values of HC and CO, which are still higher than in a standard diesel combustion.
低负荷运行的双燃料发动机中天然气和氢气预混合超低排放混合物的燃烧优化
本文的数值研究是基于一台2.8 L 4缸涡轮增压的汽车柴油发动机,考虑使用含有30 vol% H2的NG-H2混合燃料,通过多次柴油喷射点燃。3D-CFD研究旨在通过优化柴油喷射策略和缸内湍流度(旋流比,SR)来改善低负荷时的BTE、CO和UHC排放。运行条件为3000rpm - BMEP = 2bar,相当于发电机组发动机最大负载的25%左右,在3000rpm(额定转速)下可输出高达83kw的功率。在以往的数值和实验研究中,采用的参考柴油喷射策略是三枪模式。本研究中进行的数值优化包括寻找每个循环的最佳喷射次数,以及每次喷射的最佳时机和各喷射之间的燃料质量分配。分析表明,通过增加反应性较强的燃料(柴油)的局部浓度可以改善燃烧,其中最佳策略是两次喷射模式,SOI1 =−35°CA AFTDC, SOI2 =−20°CA AFTDC,第一次喷射柴油总质量的70%。就SR而言,性能和排放之间的最佳折衷是相对较低的SR = 1.4。优化后的DF H2/NG -柴油在低负荷下也能充分发挥H2富集的潜力:与DF NG相比,燃烧效率和总示热效率分别提高了45.7%和61.0%;CO-和uhc特定排放量减少了约85.0%。与优化后的DF 30 vol% H2/ NG-diesel相比,CDC完全消除了烟尘排放,co2比排放量减少了约42.0%,nox比排放量减少了33.8%。然而,为了达到可比的HC和CO值,还需要做进一步的工作,这仍然高于标准柴油燃烧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SAE International Journal of Engines
SAE International Journal of Engines TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信